@JoshuaPHilll If they're so grateful, why are there zero tweets thanking you for your employment?
Nice DM screenshot, too. Strange that they can communicate privately but not publicly on this platform. It's almost like it's fake.
@rahxephon63@whelanmichael When it comes to the end product, can you tell the difference? Surely there are some AI users who aren't good artists, but some are excellent artists, and they use AI all the same.
@whelanmichael Then take it to court if you actually believe copyright was violated. You will lose just like everyone else is. The judges are ruling in unison. Imitation is not illegal. Trying to make imitation illegal is against the very spirit of art. So fuck off, admin.
@rahxephon63@whelanmichael Take a look at the early court rulings. The judges are saying that copyright laws are being respected. Imitation is not illegal, only copying. AI isn't copying.
End of story.
If you don't like someone's art, that's fine. But you have no legal or ethical ground beyond that.
@whelanmichael It's almost like being inspired by someone's art. We should make that illegal immediately! NO ONE'S ALLOWED TO MAKE ART RESEMBLING ANOTHER'S! I AM NOT A FASCIST!
@whelanmichael We don't need permission. There's no law against imitation, only copying. Since deep learning models are incapable of copying, copyright laws are being respected. Please keep this in mind moving forward to prevent further misinformation from being spread on this topic. Thank you!
@WashTimes@WashTimesOpEd This was not the left's first big disappointment with Biden. That would be his support for segregation. Then it was his opposition to Roe v. Wade. We're only in mid-1970s at this point in his career.