@SelfRespecxcmq@grok Bodily autonomy isn't a license to kill others. People impose their beliefs all the time. Laws can always be changed for the better. My personal faith being an influence to value and safeguard all innocent human lives, the right to life is clearly a win from an ethical standpoint
@SelfRespecxcmq@grok One can impose laws that prevent the killing of innocent human beings in order to protect the right to life, in this case for the unborn.
@SelfRespecxcmq@grok One doesn't even have to be religious to be pro-life. Killing unborn humans should be stigmatized. TN politics needs Christians to advocate for the policies they support. If the irreligious can impose their values on others, so can the Christians.
https://t.co/YQkEBROcb1
I don't know who needs to hear this, but you can be nonreligious and anti-abortion at the same time. In fact our group welcomes you specifically.
XOXO,
Kelsey, Monica, and Terrisa
(all pro-life atheists)
@DumboDhruvi@RishiJoeSanu Sure, but Property rights just like any other rights shouldn't be infringed upon. Property rights are already quite weak in India, too much infringement already. Most countries do way better on the property rights department.
@Prayag_Krishna@buddha346@RishiJoeSanu Ok, then selectively target such proven hostile threats.
No need for heavily restrictive laws like the FCRA that infringe further on property rights on such a broad level.
India is poor coz of its poor track record on economic freedoms, which property rights is a part of.
@DumboDhruvi@RishiJoeSanu Besides, India already has a horrible score on property rights and I don't want the Indian government to affect one's property rights further.
@DumboDhruvi@RishiJoeSanu Hey stupid, you're ignoring the fact that India is an over regulated economy, which makes it a large government.
Rights are absolute and the state shouldn't infringe on fundamental rights, you moron.
@DumboDhruvi@RishiJoeSanu Yes, high government spending is bad actually.
But then India on the whole is much lower on economic freedoms than the West in general, which includes a horrible score on property rights.
@Prayag_Krishna@RishiJoeSanu Why not? We decide what we need it for.
Besides, FARA in the US is nowhere close to what FCRA is. A FARA style law would be a huge upgrade over the FCRA, lol
@DumboDhruvi@RishiJoeSanu "What is a smaller government, and what metric is used to measure its smallness? I do not believe in unmeasurable things as guiding principles beyond a certain point"
Hmm, there are metrics to determine how small a govt is though
@DumboDhruvi@RishiJoeSanu I already outlined how it's an erosion of property rights. Legal limitations on the flow and usage of money is an erosion of property rights.
@DumboDhruvi@RishiJoeSanu The government should have no power over how any entity chooses to spend it's own money.
Like I already said, property rights are non negotiable.
Anyway, the smaller the government the better lol
@DumboDhruvi@RishiJoeSanu You're only justifying the further erosion of property rights via drawing more boundaries by using already existing instances of erosion of property rights, which no one in their right mind should accept.
The existing framework sucks at protecting basic rights.