@FBI please take note on this disinformation and freespeech supression tactics from @bakerstuts , @atadams_at who's account show continious spread of fake images to supress freespeech.
Subject: Report on Disinformation Campaign Involving Fake "Jonas Cloud" Images
To: FBI
Overview: A campaign spreads forged images purporting to show anomalous "Jonas clouds," created via photobashing in Photoshop, with added noise/dithering, linearized, and injected into hollowed Canon CR2 donor files. Lacks real CMOS sensor noise (e.g., shot/read/thermal variance).
Key Individuals:
- atadams_at (Tony Adams): Advocated auto_bright_thr=0 in processing to disable auto-brightening, masking histogram anomalies; pushed custom white balance to correct gamma, obscuring forgeries.
- BakersTuts: Involved in tutorials or promotion of anti-forensic methods, aiding image manipulation tactics.
Anti-Forensic Tactics:
- Hollowing donor CR2s: Removes original sensor data, inserting fabricated content without electrical charges in CMOS bins.
- auto_bright_thr=0: Prevents automatic level adjustments that could reveal clipped histograms.
- Noise addition/dithering: Simulates but fails to replicate true Gaussian tails in shadows (e.g., zeros below ~1024 ADU vs. real ~3-5 ADU variance at ISO 200).
- Gamma/WB corrections: Adjusts for 2.2 to 1 gamma to blend fakes.
Forensic Proof:
- Histogram analysis: Real Canon EOS CR2s (14-bit) show right-skewed distributions with low-end noise tails; fakes exhibit sharp cutoffs and no variance below thresholds, indicating synthetic origins (no photon-to-electron conversion).
- Absence of live sensor artifacts: No inherent read/thermal noise, confirming "dead sensor" manipulation.
- Only 19 such images identified, likely limited to evade scrutiny.
This campaign uses technical obfuscation to promote misinformation. Recommend investigating sources for intent/motivation.
(478 characters)
@LittleFish9305@0bscuratea@AshtonForbes So this guy dug his own grave , called their own Cr2 container fake and went on an offensive with his copy paste job, and blocked me for asking for details.
Jonas images have photoshop noise and the rows cancel out like a highly compressed jpeg, inserted into a cr2 container.
@0bscuratea@LittleFish9305@AshtonForbes I asked for how you measured, not the formulae. What did you measure and show me the details, script
My script does not change the contsiner fool, you dont know what you're talking about.
@0bscuratea@LittleFish9305@AshtonForbes There was no "my cr2" , it shows tou dont understand what you been copy pasting, mostly likely to from my own articles.
The entire container is 1839.cr2
@0bscuratea@LittleFish9305@AshtonForbes Natural sensor noise in jonas images? You just claimed the sensor border was fake in his CR2 container.
14 bit photon noise? Whats that and ok show me how you measured photon noise
@0bscuratea@LittleFish9305@AshtonForbes a Jpeg is 8bit you idiot, it only has 256 colors LOL RAW is Gamma 1.1, it isnt fucked, it requires post processing.
The sensor border and the CR2 is from the Jonas fake image 1839 lol, you're digigng your own grave. I already know his images are fake.
@LittleFish9305@AshtonForbes In VFX procedural 3D modeling like the one Jonas did also requires large scale scene generation , and sniping areas for continuity. The problem these fools did not account for prespective shifts and geometric changes. Also why they were able to stitch all clouds seamlessly
@0bscuratea@LittleFish9305@AshtonForbes What do you mean new CR2? What messy trail? TIFF fucked? Lol you seem totally shaken and unable to speak.
Post the exiftool dump and the offsets you think are broken,
@0bscuratea@LittleFish9305@AshtonForbes Are you new to images and aspect ratio? It will be squished unless i trim it to the right ratio.
I helped you understand whats possible, tho i bet you already knew. Can easily replace the thumbnail but too bad your scam team has already folded. Visit cr2editor for a full cr2.
@arwenevenstarr_@HometownBuffett I have the RAW .CR2 files. You can not fake a RAW file. Only light hitting a cameras sensor can write that data. There would be major issues that tools like libraw, if it could even open a processed format converted to RAW would show. No underlying photon data, would be obvious.
@MickWest BREAKING:
*UAP ‘DEBUNKER’ MICK WEST CAUGHT CHEATING*
West falsified data from the Syria UAP video to make the object’s instantaneous acceleration *APPEAR* to be an artifact of camera movement.
His 3D sim deviates from the true data *the instant* the UAP accelerates.
SHAMEFUL.
I’m from the middle of nowhere where tons of people have 30-06. Most of my friends. Everyone deer hunts with 30-06 unless their hunting with dogs and a 12 gauge. So I was/am a big 30-06 skeptic.
But I understand (to your points) frangible and varmint rounds make it more possible
And since I can’t come up with a reasonable explanation of what DID happen (if I’m making the case the official story is 100% false) - I’m simply going to wait for the trial and see what comes out- Iike a sane person.
+90% of the people saying 30-06 prob don’t shoot guns. They just watched some demos of 30-06 FMJs. And want to shitpost/engagement farm.
It was the only reasonable point to address early on imo. But grifters and charlatans used ONE legitimate issue - to run with 7 months of crazy theories about Egyptian planes, Ft Huachuca, French foreign legion, ancient Sumerian tech and time travel. Etc etc.
@john_boze@MichelMooreNWFL Not going to dismiss your observstion John, theres merit there.
Effects are often added not to mislead but to augment.
It can be deliberate, someone following a playbook to discredit. Never know.