Full stack web3 developer on IPFS and the Ethereum Virtual Machine.
Agorist, CryptoAnarchist & PoGo master. Here to shit post and learn shit. Meme thief.
As promised, this is a thread I'm titling:
"Mask mandates are Anti-Science nonsense".
In this thread I will be sharing 100+ years worth of scientific research into the efficacy of masks in regard to viral transmission.
@mavyak Kinda, they actually have a jury process for censorship so if a post is flagged they choose random community members to judge and decide what should be done.
Censorship resistance is in reference to the fact that you can store content to their blockchain solution for content.
Figured I'd pop in here on the bird app to see how the purge is going, lmao.
I wanted to throw out the invitation again for those of you looking for a new home, check out minds. Its censorship resistant, partially blockchain based and on it's own servers
https://t.co/KZ6Thc5iV9
I'm officially off the bird app. Follow me on minds if ur on there @ stan36(spaced as to not tag the person with that handle on here)
If your not I suggest jumping ship from the thought police platform since they have decided themselves the arbiters of truth.
Peace.
@johnrod91462647 @baudrillard2020 @marklevinshow The lead author of which study? Many of those studies are RCT's, which have been championed as the gold standard for these types of studies.
Sorry, but you dont get to dismiss all of them with a broad stroke and a vague appeal to some authority.
@johnrod91462647 @baudrillard2020 @marklevinshow In what way is siting actual studies spanning the course of several decades "coming at it with a bias"?
Even if it where, that does nothing to diminish the overwhelming amount of evidence that conclusively shows masks to be ineffective in regard to viral transmission.
@johnrod91462647 @baudrillard2020 @marklevinshow Wow, not even gonna try for the bonus points huh?
Did you even bother reading that? It's just a bunch of *mights* and *maybes*. No studies really sited nor evidence put forth. Hell, it even admits there to be no evidence to support the use of masks.
Thanks for proving my point
@SpiritWild42 But do feel free to provide your "debunking" because acknowledging that they inflated the deaths and then saying "well they fixed it by removing some" isnt the same as "debunking the story" as false.
W the y do these morons still insist that a virus with a greater than 99% survival rate is putting anyone in jeopardy besides the elderly and those with preexisting conditions?
@SpiritWild42 I absolutely did not acknowledge anything of the sort. If I remember right the conversation ended with me pointing out the fact that the numbers they removed where only a small portion of those that should have been removed, as the article I linked you supports.
@SpiritWild42 To this point, this is a great article detailing exactly how these numbers are inflated(without counting the nursing home incident) which places the real number of deaths under 100k.
https://t.co/lqJx2KSFVf
@SpiritWild42 Are you denying that they've been reclassifying deaths to covid?
Are you denying hospitals have been financially incentivised to classify deaths as covid by the federal government?
You have to be insane to look at all that, all of which is proven fact, and say they arnt inflated
@SpiritWild42 Are you insane? Are you denying that they purposefully put infected patients into nursing homes?
Are you denying that they are counting every death with covid as a death from covid?
Are you denying that they've been adding suicides and motorcycle deaths to the count?
@SpiritWild42 That's total nonsense. There is absolutely NO reason to support a vaccine for a virus with a greater than 99% survival rate. Especially with the history of injuries vaccines cause. Only a gullible idiot or a lunatic would think a covid vaccine to be a good thing given the climate
@SpiritWild42 I agree 205k is bigger than 30k, but I disagree that 205k is anywhere near the actual covid death count as its artificially inflated in several different ways.
So your saying you dont give a flying fuck about the 30k people who die in car crashes a year? Good to know.
@SpiritWild42 In 2010, there were an estimated 5,419,000 crashes, 30,296 deadly, killing 32,999, and injuring 2,239,000.[2] About 2,000 children under 16 die every year in traffic collisions.
Compare this to the horribly inflated 205k number and car accidents effect far more people