@G_S_Bhogal It's not a theory, it's a normal swing of time between individualization (masculine) and collectivization (feminine) as we evolve more and more complex societies.
@romanhelmetguy America: "Stop trading with China."
Europe: "You built China into what it is. We're just late to your party."
America: "The party's over."
You built your own devil. Don't blame us when he turned against you.
42 pages into my second reading and this 750-page monster may be the best book I’ve ever read.
Three pages an hour, working with Chat, because every paragraph layers political and psychological analysis in ways that are crazy erudite and genuinely creative.
Thucydides wrote from the position of a multipolar world of city-states without a clear hegemon - a fundamentally different structure than today.
The logic of "take what you can while you can" was rational in that world.
If the USA doesn't want to lose its position as hegemon, it should keep this tactic only for demonstrative shots in its own backyard.
In the current world, it's cheaper for the USA in the long term to maintain hegemony through norms and institutions rather than through pure force. The USA didn't build the UN, Bretton Woods, and NATO after WWII out of altruism, but because order reduces the costs of maintaining a dominant position.
So Thucydides is right for a bilateral strong-weak relationship. But at the systemic level, it's incomplete - a hegemon has an interest in creating a structure where at least some rules apply, even if it reserves the right to break them when necessary.