Os cuento:
El AVE de Renfe ha chocado por detrás contra un Iryo que estaba parado en la vía. ¿Y por qué estaba parado?
Esa mañana falló el LZB, el sistema que vigila automáticamente la distancia entre trenes y los frena si hay peligro. Sin él, se pasa a un modo de emergencia. Los trenes avanzan con señales laterales y con órdenes que da por radio el centro de control.
Por el fallo, unos 8 trenes quedaron retenidos en la zona. Entre ellos, el Iryo y, detrás, el AVE. Allí no hay estación ni parada comercial. Fue una parada por el tráfico, no programada.
Cuando se ordenó reanudar la marcha, el Iryo NO pudo arrancar y se quedó parado en la vía. ¿Por qué no arrancó? Nadie lo ha explicado, y en la SER cuentan que no consiguen localizar al maquinista, así que puede estar entre los fallecidos.
Según fuentes del Gobierno citadas por El País, desde el centro de control de Atocha se habría dado por error la orden de avanzar al AVE, con el Iryo todavía delante. Ojo, es una versión anónima, no una conclusión oficial. Ya les conocemos.
En ese modo de emergencia, la norma es que si no hay certeza de que la vía está libre, el tren debe ir a la vista,
a 40 km/h como máximo y listo para frenar ante un obstáculo. A esa velocidad, un choque tan grave sería muy difícil, además vemos como la vía a atravesado el tren.
En 2021 Adif adjudicó a Thales la renovación de la señalización de esta línea, incluida la llegada del ERTMS, el sistema que debe sustituir al LZB: 93,8 M€ y un plazo de 52 meses. Eso marcaba el final para principios de 2026. En octubre de 2026 el ERTMS sigue sin funcionar.
Según elEconomista, la migración del LZB al ERTMS estaba en fase final de pruebas este mes. Además, el mantenimiento de la señalización, incluido el LZB, lo tiene la UTE GTS–SEMI (87,3 M€). ¿Había trabajos en el sistema el día del fallo?
Va a haber cien análisis hoy de la tragedia en Toledo, pero muy poca gente hablará de que nuestro sistema de trenes (que era envidiable) se ha ido a la mierda desde la liberalización del sector.
En el periodo 1992-2021 donde la explotación ferroviaria era exclusiva de RENFE se produjeron 0 accidentes en Alta Velocidad, 1 contando el Alvia Madrid-Ferrol que utilizaba un tramo de Alta Velocidad.
Desde su liberalización del transporte (2021-2026) llevamos 56 muertos.
Para que ocurra un accidente ferroviario como el de Adamuz o el de hoy tienen que alinearse varios puntos de fallo a la vez
en una red bien mantenida, la probabilidad individual de cada fallo es tan baja que la probabilidad conjunta es prácticamente nula
el problema viene cuando dejas que el sistema se degrade en todos sus niveles: poco a poco la probabilidad de cada fallo individual empieza a subir, hasta que la probabilidad conjunta deja de ser despreciable y estás comprando papeletas todos los días hasta que al final te toca
que no nos vengan con la excusa de la "mala suerte" o de "error humano": un sistema crítico se diseña de forma robusta precisamente asumiendo que las piezas se rompen y que los humanos se equivocan, e introduce redundancias para absorber esos errores sin que acaben en tragedia
a cualquiera que haya cogido un tren en España en los últimos años ni lo de Adamuz ni lo de hoy le sorprende lo más mínimo
tenemos a un exministro de Transportes en la cárcel, a la ex-presidenta de ADIF investigada
casualidades, las justas
Aquí hay responsables.
La rubia que está detrás de Abascal es Marcela Reigía, y pertenece al lobby sionista ACOM, que sabéis que me ha denunciado. Votar a Vox es votar a Israel, es votar a Netanyahu. Por esto, Vox es un partido vendepatrias y antiespañol. Si eres de Vox y me sigues y no te gusta lo que digo, deja de seguirme. Si decides quedarte conmigo, vayamos juntos a saber la verdad, aunque duela.
Ojalá directivos de colegios y padres de familia lean este artículo. Los efectos de largo plazo, tanto a nivel individual como agregado, del deterioro de la calidad de la educación, pueden ser devastadores. La exigencia, el trabajo duro, la disciplina, son muy importantes.
La bandera de España junto a la Ikurriña, no hay más preguntas, esto está organizado desde fuera y para un público muy concreto que no tiene nada que ver con ideologías sino con pandilleros y "jóvenes" lumpenizados.
Lo que pasó anoche en Barcelona huele a una operación encubierta/ataque hibrido
Esto no viene de ninguna organización de izquierdas ni, en general, de ninguna organización conocida. Ha sido una movilización convocada a través de TikTok y WhatsApp que llamaba a replicar lo ocurrido en Francia
Ahora viene lo interesante:
El nombre de los «convocantes» es Blocus, un grupo del que no había constancia que existiera en españa hasta el 18 de octubre (hace 6 días)
Entre el 18 y el 19 de octubre se activaron unas 20 cuentas en TikTok, prácticamente al mismo tiempo, llamando a hacer lo mismo que en Francia
Algunas de estas cuentas llegaron a publicar hasta 59 vídeos en apenas 48 horas
Los grupos de WhatsApp identificados no llegaban a los 1.000 participantes
¿Alguien de verdad me quiere convencer de que un grupo espontáneo aparece en TikTok hace seis días y consigue movilizar a miles de chavales para salir de forma organizada por Barcelona a quemar cosas y saquear locales concretos?
Y, además, justo en plena época electoral. Huele esto muy mal
Previous Prime Minister said he would let in 200,000 immigrants in the span of 5 years or such.
He let in 2million immigrants in 2-3 years.
The people he let in are criminals, petty criminals, thieves, rapists, gang bangers, drug dealers and people who take advantage of our housing, food pantries and other free systems. A very low percentage of them are good and an even lower percentage of them actually provide something; literally anything that isn’t negative.
So our housing issue turned into a crisis and is now critical and probably about to crash.
Boomer parents are not helping their kids as they age out of the house; being more narcissistic, bullying, demanding and entitled than ever before. All while insulting us based on “lack of education” “lack of financial independence and control” “lack of respect for our elders” “being too lazy” and “no one wants to work anymore”
The immigrant crisis has also caused a rise of specifically owned restaurants to pop up; being local smaller restaurants being taken over by Indian restaurants.
Jobs are very much the same where once there is an Indian manager, the only people they hire is their own kind.
No more white employees, no black, Hispanic, Muslim, Jewish, Asian, etc.
Which also affects kids, teenagers and young adults from getting their first time jobs, even minimum wage jobs, getting the job experience they need for future employment opportunities and overall lack of job experience and security. Which also means they earn basically no money and have no way to move out of their parent’s basement.
So at the risk of your mental health and wellbeing, you are forced to live with them longer.
There is also an insane turn over rate here for healthcare. We need doctors, healthcare experts and providers, nurses, and professionals so badly. People are waiting years to get seen, emergencies are waiting hours to the point of permanent injuries happening due to long wait times or even people dying while waiting.
And don’t get us wrong, healthcare people are being paid good. But they are way way way way!! overworked and overwhelmed and burn out fast, to the point they quit. So we have more jobless people and less staff in our healthcare sector.
Oh, and our rent is extremely high. Our groceries only cost more and more. It’s cheaper to buy both food and gas in the USA right now; also housing AND in the USA we might have a $300k medical bill but at least we will leave the hospital walking and not in a coffin.
Oh, and cherry on top. Our old prime minister that did this all to us? Who fucked us so badly? Who fucked 40million Canadians so badly our 5x removed grandchildren will feel our pain?
He went to the USA to party and live it up with his new girlfriend; Katy Perry.
Problemas REALES de los profesores:
-Los equipos directivos que necesitan lameculos.
-Los padres jodiendo la marrana constantemente.
-Alumnos disruptivos dando el coñazo (suelen ser hijos de esos padres)
-Erráticas leyes y absurdos programas.
-Compañeros que se escaquean….
A ninth century manuscript - confirmed authentic - includes a confession from Jewish conspirators explaining how ten Rabbinic scholars converted to Islam to protect Jews from Muhammad, write the Qur’an for him, and base its law off of Jewish precepts.
Oh, and it’s not just their random confession without evidence. Those Jewish scholars placed “Easter eggs” inside the Qur’an to verify Jews wrote it, and then disclosed what they were in that confession.
Again, it’s a valid manuscript, historically authenticated, and it circulated over several centuries in different languages, taking credit for Islam.
A century before, a Christian church leader made the same accusation of ten Jews who at first converted because they thought Muhammad was the perfect warlord Messiah they were looking for. But after watching him eat a camel, they decided they were wrong, but stayed “converted” to help shape the Qur’an.
They were particularly proud of crafting Shariah off of Halakha, and weaving in hostility toward Christians.
There’s motive. There’s verifiable evidence in the Qur’an. There’s an allegation from a Christian witness there to see it in person. And a century later, a confession from the Jews themselves.
That’s case closed.
Either the Jews wrote the Qur’an and shaped Islam, or the Jews were lying, and bragging about doing it. That would be a pretty weird flex. But that wouldn’t explain how their clues exist in the Islamic canon itself.
Islamic history is Jewish history.
Read more at Insight to Incite. Link in bio. Audio available.
El 80% de las intervenciones educativas no mejoran los resultados educativos. Cuando se hacen análisis rigurosos con pruebas controladas y aleatorias se comprueban que muchas medidas educativas en realidad no funcionan https://t.co/QAlNtc00ZM https://t.co/pMWES3tIzy
You've probably seen the video. A young Frenchwoman in Paris, in tears, begging looters to stop. "Why are you doing this? That's not what we stand for."
Some accounts are mocking her. "She voted for it."
I won't. Because what you see on her face is not stupidity. It's a disease that has infected the entire West, and it has a name: suicidal empathy.
The term comes from Gad Saad, an evolutionary behavioral scientist at Concordia University in Montreal. A man who fled the Lebanese civil war as a child, and who knows what it looks like when a society falls apart. His new book, Suicidal Empathy: Dying to Be Kind, is the follow-up to The Parasitic Mind. Here is the thesis, and why it concerns every one of us.
Empathy is one of the best things about us. It evolved for a reason: to care for our children, our kin, our tribe. It was calibrated for a world where the people you felt for were the people around you, and where empathy always came paired with its counterweight: the instinct to protect your own and to recognize a threat.
Suicidal empathy is what happens when that mechanism misfires. When it fires at the wrong targets, in the wrong amounts, with no brake. When we feel more for the criminal than for his victim. More for the stranger who breaks the rules than for the citizen who follows them. More for how compassionate we look than for what our compassion actually produces.
Where does it come from? Four layers.
First, biology. Empathy is a spotlight, as the psychologist Paul Bloom put it. It lights up the one face in front of you and leaves everything else in the dark. The crying migrant on the boat is visible. The thousands of future victims of a broken system are statistics. A spotlight is a terrible tool for running a country.
Second, our own civilization. The West is the civilization that put the victim at the center of its morality. Christianity taught us to care for the stranger, the poor, the weak. It was one of the greatest moral revolutions in history. But cut off from its other half, justice, responsibility, the duty to protect your own, it turns into something else.
Third, ideology. In The Parasitic Mind, Saad described idea pathogens, ideas that hijack our reasoning. Suicidal empathy is the emotional counterpart: an ideology that hijacks our compassion. It sorts the world into oppressors and victims, then demands unlimited empathy for whoever ranks as the victim, whatever they do.
Fourth, status. In the age of social media, empathy has become a display. Posting "refugees welcome" costs nothing and earns applause. The bill goes to someone else: the working class, the suburbs, the women walking home at night.
The results are everywhere. Criminals treated as victims of society. Sexual assaults by migrants met with lenient sentences. Self-defense branded as aggression. Borders treated as cruelty. Saad's conclusion is simple: a society dies when it would rather display infinite tolerance than use its survival instinct.
Now the part I'll add myself, and that few people dare to say.
On average, women score higher than men on measures of empathy. It's one of the most consistent findings in psychology, across cultures, and it makes perfect evolutionary sense: for most of human history, the survival of children depended on it. It's a strength.
But it means an ideology that weaponizes empathy will hit women harder. And the data shows it: in country after country, young women have moved sharply to the left of young men, especially on immigration.
This is where men have a responsibility.
Not to mock. Not to lecture. Not to say "she deserved it." Empathy has always needed a counterweight, and that counterweight was the protective instinct: the one that draws lines, says no, and stands between the threat and the people it loves.
Men abandoned that role. They were told it was toxic, and many believed it. So they stayed silent at the dinner table, at work, with their partners, sisters, daughters and friends.
That has to end. Men have to have this conversation, honestly and with respect: compassion that cannot say no is not compassion. It's surrender. And the first to pay for it are women.
Many women already understand this better than anyone. Some of the bravest voices in this fight are women, precisely because they are the first to feel the danger in the street.
A civilization rests on a balance: compassion and strength, openness and borders, mercy and justice. When one side swallows the other, the foundations crack. What we are watching in Europe is what happens when empathy has no counterweight left.
Look at that young woman again. She isn't the enemy. She's what this ideology made of a generation that was told kindness would be enough.
Our job is to make sure she's the last generation that has to learn it this way.