NQ 🇨🇦 🇺🇸

Just pretend it’s all ok

[NQ 🇨🇦 🇺🇸 @NomadicQuantum]

Most, if not all sexologists on X, assert that pedophilia (defined as attraction to pre-pubescent children) is immutable and can be viewed as a sexual orientation. However, the evidence for this belief is weak. /1

[NQ 🇨🇦 🇺🇸 @NomadicQuantum]

@AmericasCousin Also “has similarities to” is not the same as “is similar to” by any stretch.

[NQ 🇨🇦 🇺🇸 @NomadicQuantum]

A fundamental uncertainty exists between pure metasexuality and pure orientation. I believe this applies to metasexuality in AGPs appearing as “organic” homosexuality. Phallometric tests cannot definitively rule this out in any particular case since the meta-sexually attracted AGP can self-insert into the sexual scene portrayed. This is not to say that organic homosexuality doesn’t exist.

[NQ 🇨🇦 🇺🇸 @NomadicQuantum]

@AmericasCousin @4th_WaveNow @profjmb @elegationvain @gynemimesis @RayAlexWilliams @GAMPbian Aaron also blocked me when I pointed out her/his Schrödinger's cat superposition of both claiming to do research and claiming to not do research, in addition to other remarks.

https://t.co/k9XB33Q6m3

[NQ 🇨🇦 🇺🇸 @NomadicQuantum]

@elegationvain Also, your version of research doesn’t preclude you from making personal attacks on serious scientists like Blanchard.

[NQ 🇨🇦 🇺🇸 @NomadicQuantum]

There’s a famous line of psychology research (Nisbett and Wilson) showing people confidently explain why they made a choice, and those explanations are often demonstrably wrong. They are invented after the fact. So humans don’t just lack memory of where our knowledge came from; we actively make up plausible-sounding origins.

[NQ 🇨🇦 🇺🇸 @NomadicQuantum]

@autogampegg @BlanchardPhD There’s lots of evidence from memory research that we all reconstruct our histories.

[NQ 🇨🇦 🇺🇸 @NomadicQuantum]

@sealloewe @gynemimesis @4th_WaveNow @profjmb @elegationvain @RayAlexWilliams @GAMPbian Blanchard chose the word autogynephilia based on Greek roots meaning “love of oneself as a woman”.

[NQ 🇨🇦 🇺🇸 @NomadicQuantum]

@gynemimesis @4th_WaveNow @profjmb @elegationvain @RayAlexWilliams @GAMPbian Leads to the conclusion that every sexual attraction can be due toAGP.

[NQ 🇨🇦 🇺🇸 @NomadicQuantum]

@gynemimesis @4th_WaveNow @profjmb @elegationvain @RayAlexWilliams @GAMPbian I’m waiting for the paper “Penis envy in gender dysphoric, natal females”.

[NQ 🇨🇦 🇺🇸 @NomadicQuantum]

@gynemimesis @4th_WaveNow @profjmb @elegationvain @RayAlexWilliams @GAMPbian Once one introduces meta attraction then no attraction in males who “love themselves as a woman” can be ruled out. Also, as your graph indicates, all attractions for trans women can be due to AGP, which is what you’ve been saying for a long time.

[NQ 🇨🇦 🇺🇸 @NomadicQuantum]

@4th_WaveNow @profjmb @elegationvain @gynemimesis @RayAlexWilliams @GAMPbian The mantra of autoheterosexuality is that it is no more or less than an inner directed, normal male heterosexuality. According to my reading, Blanchard never made such a claim in peer reviewed publications. /7

[NQ 🇨🇦 🇺🇸 @NomadicQuantum]

It only makes sense to say that two entities are similar to each other when their similarities vastly outweigh their differences. As far as I can read, no one has conclusively shown this to be true for AGP versus male heterosexuality. According to my understanding, that’s why Blanchard has never said in peer reviewed publications that AGP was similar to male heterosexuality. /6

[NQ 🇨🇦 🇺🇸 @NomadicQuantum]

@autogampegg @Dragonpanties @EmpiricalThumb @AlexxiAlexxi99 Since you’re accusing me of bad faith, I’m going to disengage from this conversation. And analogous involves making analogies.

[NQ 🇨🇦 🇺🇸 @NomadicQuantum]

@autogampegg @Dragonpanties @EmpiricalThumb @AlexxiAlexxi99 No it isn’t. Has similarities too is not the same thing as being similar.

[NQ 🇨🇦 🇺🇸 @NomadicQuantum]

I know that Bailey has made remarks like that, but I believe Blanchard himself went no further than “analogous” and has “similarities” to in his comparison between AGP and normative male heterosexuality. I don’t believe Bailey is correct on this on other issues as well. If you find a peer reviewed publication by Blanchard that went further than his 2005 review summary let me know.

[NQ 🇨🇦 🇺🇸 @NomadicQuantum]

@DerekPederson3 @intentionalisms @Etanarachel Aaron is in a quantum superposition of doing and not doing “research”, because the problem is too difficult otherwise.