@beesley_cathy No. Because attendees were threatened with doxing and worse by the TRA's. This was a smear campaign by trans activists who didn't want the truth about the law to be heard.
@ClaireCoutinho If it only applies to criticism of Islam then it is biased and unfair guidance from the start. It implies that Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism, Sikhism are all fair game.
@Juvelad@michaelpforan He's only interpreting and explaining the actual law as it is now. That's as balanced as it gets. If you don’t agree with the law, lobby for change. You're just shooting the messenger.
@SamanthaNiblet4@Tinkabel198 That's an extraordinarily idiotic metaphor. How does someone this stupid become an MP.
If you want to intellectually argue the trans debate on this platform, you've brought a pea shooter to a tank battle.
@swklibdems@VMMChamberlain Labour has not refused to listen to anybody and has not given in to online fear-mongering and vitriol. It has simply accepted the EHRC's guidance on how service providers should obey the laws of the land and laid it before parliament.
If you disagree, change the law.
@labourlewis "Birthing people". Idiotic! They're ALL WOMEN!
Anyone giving birth and claiming to be anything other than a woman is a deranged moron. Don't pander to them. It reveals that you are just as moronic.
@ellaerislives@NChaleunphone@zaelefty Your argument attempts to co-opt people with DSD's into your fight to get into spaces reserved for the opposite sex. It's utterly obscene. How dare you.
@stellacreasy You can object to the guidance as much as you like. It doesn't change the law. If you want to change the law, good luck. 86% of 51% of the electorate will see you out of a job.
@jk_rowling@Gigi0100203@alexmassie It's nothing to worry your pretty little heads about . Besides, it'll leave you more time for making chutney and so forth.