Even the “isolation” comparison is weak.
During lockdowns most people could go outside, exercise, communicate freely, and live with family.
Astronauts are confined to a spacecraft, exposed to microgravity and radiation, and physically separated from humanity.
The environments aren’t remotely equivalent.
NASA’s confinement research is interesting, but using astronauts as a proxy for people living through lockdowns is a false equivalence.
NASA studying isolation doesn’t make astronauts a valid proxy for lockdowns.
Similarity in one variable (confinement) doesn’t erase the dozens of other factors unique to spaceflight.
That’s an analogy, not evidence.
The only shame is you and him ignoring all those unique variables.
@DonSuths88@_johnbye Yet he wasn’t.
This is just you lot going round 2 to ghoul on his misfortune again.
🔗 https://t.co/E1zwTxURNB
🔗 https://t.co/y5VXlAr4ce