@TechLibertyCLE I remain hopeful that this is contemporary and reversible.
Socialized education+social media has allowed the most remedial in every field to manufacture false consensus.
@RobGoodall6@DrJMarine It's amazing that even after the Covid vaccine debacle people still believe that injected vaccines prevent airborne spread.
It's a commitment to stupidity that I'll never understand.
@SimonDTweets@cinzett@jsm2334@KUPERWASSERLAB The head of vaccine safety at the FDA admitted in private that AEs after Covid vaccines were common yet too scattershot for the CDCs most advanced monitoring systems to catch.
This is what happens when you inject something into people's bodies with the biodistribution of LNPs.
@jsm2334@SimonDTweets@KUPERWASSERLAB The journal editors could have easily made the authors briefly explain the limitations of their study, without denying publication of what was perfectly fine data.
It's as Woodcock admitted to Fauci, there is a profound systemic bias against acknowledging vaccine harm.
@jsm2334@SimonDTweets@KUPERWASSERLAB And this is different than all of the control matched studies lacking negative controls that claim a statistical vaccine benefit in the abstract but briefly mention a likely HVE towards the end of the study?
@jsm2334@SimonDTweets@KUPERWASSERLAB Basic deductive reasoning renders Covid or missed screenings as highly inplausible reasons for cancer deaths to surge in Japan in 2022 but not 2020 or 2021.
@jsm2334@SimonDTweets@KUPERWASSERLAB Papers shouldn't be retracted because the data wasn't granularized enough to prove or disprove a particular idea.
And they generally aren't so long as the authors stick to the script in their verbal analysis.
@SimonDTweets@jsm2334@KUPERWASSERLAB There was a well done study by Japanese academics that found excess age standardized cancer deaths in 2022 but not 2020 or 2021.
It was denied publication because its authors refused to dismiss vaccines as a possibility.