JennyJennyJenny

SAHM, homeschooler, historian

[Department of State @StateDept]

Ideological conditioning and two-tiered policing are glaring symptoms of civilizational decline. They must be rejected across the West.

The United States sends our condolences to the family of Henry Nowak and the people of the United Kingdom at this troubling time.

[JD Vance @JDVance]

Henry Nowak died the same way a civilization dies: abandoned, handcuffed by authorities who neither trusted nor cared for him, and accused of hate crimes he did not commit. His murder is as tragic as it is enraging. He should still be alive today, and he would be if the last few generations of European elites had stood their ground against the politics of self-hatred and the mass invasion of migrants, many of whom despise the West and the people who love it.

Henry was far from the first to so needlessly lose his life, and I fear he won’t be the last. Each time a life like his is lost, the proper response—the only response—is righteous anger. One of the most important things the Trump administration has proven to the world is that stopping the flow of mass migration and defending national sovereignty is a matter of political will and leadership. Anything else is an excuse.

It is because we love the West that we want to preserve it. We love our civilization. We love our country. We love our children. And nobody—nobody—should ever die the way that Henry Nowak died. May God comfort those who loved him, and may God rest his soul.

[Terry Ford 🇺🇸🇮🇱 JESUS SAVES ✝️ @tlfordxx]

@HomanNews @SashGirlVegas

[JennyJennyJenny @NotTheBestPlan1]

I can only assume the French authorities are frantically searching for a way to bring the condemmed Pakistanis to the safety of France.

[Daily Mail @DailyMail]

Pakistanis who gang-raped French tourist in front of her three children after her car ran out of fuel will be executed.

[THIERRY D "ardéchois et français" @ThierryTout]

La française Florence Aseult mérite d'être mise en avant pour son don artistique de l'enluminure.
Voici une page de manuscrit intitulée "La Passion du Christ", qu'elle peint à la main sur du parchemin de chèvre selon la tradition médiévale.
Magnifique !🤩
(🎥aseultenluminure/IG)

[JennyJennyJenny @NotTheBestPlan1]

@martinharmer @LeeAndersonMP_ No. His son's death points to a much larger problem with policing in the UK and allowing the authorities to hide behind the pretense that acknowledging, let alone addressing, the problem is disrespectful to the family is a disingenuous convenience.

[JennyJennyJenny @NotTheBestPlan1]

@Keir_Starmer You pretend to be honoring Nowak's family by refusing to discuss the fact that your officers handcuffed a dying boy who kept repeating he had been stabbed and the last thing he heard as he died was a police caution. Why? Because a brown man said he was a racist and that's enough.

[Karen Vaites @karenvaites]

“We are admitting a cohort that cannot read at a college level and are pretending otherwise.”

Another college professor adds to the chorus of concern about student capacity.

In @chronicle:

“Six weeks into the term, I assigned my rhetoric and writing students a 20-page article. It was the same length I had assigned for five years and the same length I had read without complaint as an undergraduate a decade ago. Not one student finished it.

When I asked why, a student answered honestly: It was too long, and she kept losing track of what the paper was about. This was not a remedial class: These were students who had cleared the admissions process and written essays good enough to get them here. Yet a routine academic reading assignment had defeated them.

Every generation of professors has complained that their students cannot read. The lament is usually overblown, but data have caught up to anecdote, and what I am seeing in my classroom is no longer a hunch. There is a measurable, generational collapse in sustained reading and writing, and the academy is responding to it with improvisation and exhaustion rather than the structural overhaul it requires.

In February 2024, Adam Kotsko, who teaches in the Shimer Great Books School at North Central College, wrote in Slate that students who once handled 30 pages of reading per class meeting now seem “intimidated by anything over 10 pages and seem to walk away from readings of as little as 20 pages with no real understanding.” Crucially, he added that this is “not a matter of laziness on the part of the students” but of underlying skills they were never given a chance to build.

The Chronicle of Higher Education’s 2024 investigation found the same pattern across institutions as different as the Stevens Institute of Technology and Wellesley College, where the average SAT exceeds 1400. Nicholaus Gutierrez, an assistant professor at Wellesley, told The Chronicle that the baseline for what students consider a reasonable amount of work has dropped so noticeably that he has cut his readings accordingly; a 750-word essay now strikes many students as long. At Stevens, the science and technology studies associate professor Theresa MacPhail described following the mantra of “meet your students where they are” for so long that she has begun to feel “like a cruise director organizing games of shuffleboard.”

Worse, the national data tell the same story in colder language. On the 2011 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) writing assessment, which is the most recent comprehensive writing benchmark, only 24 percent of 12th graders reached the Proficient level, and just 3 percent reached Advanced; another 21 percent scored below Basic. The reading side of the ledger is worse, and getting worse fast: The 2024 NAEP results released in September 2025 show 12th-grade reading scores at the lowest level recorded since the assessment began in 1992. Thirty-two percent of 12th graders now score below NAEP Basic in reading, meaning that, in the assessment’s own language, they likely “cannot draw general conclusions based on concepts presented explicitly in a text.” And yet more than half of these same seniors reported being accepted to a four-year college. That last sentence is the whole problem in one line: We are admitting a cohort that cannot read at a college level and are pretending otherwise.”

[Dave Portnoy @stoolpresidente]

Not caring about him wheeling six chicks at once when he was married is your choice

Not caring that he pretends to be a populist when he went to one of the richest prep schools in America is your choice

Not caring he went to war saying he always wanted to kill people is your choice

Not caring he went to work for Blackwater after serving and now calls the army very dumb and stupid is your choice

Not caring that he made fun of Purple Heart recipients is your choice

Not caring that he jerks off in porta potties is your choice

Not caring about all the shit he’s deleted on Reddit and he never thought would see the light of day and shows what a giant jackass is he is your choice

Not caring that he is a Nazi is your choice but if you support him and promote him don’t ever lecture anybody about the moral high ground again because you are a piece of shit

[Kat Rosenfield @katrosenfield]

The funny thing is that if I wrote Platner as a fictional character, my editor would be like "look, your villain can have either a Nazi tattoo *or* a porta-potty masturbation habit, but not both"

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

Je me suis longtemps passionné pour la psychologie, et une période m'obsède plus que toutes les autres.

L'après-guerre.

Le moment où des chercheurs se sont posé la question la plus dérangeante du siècle: comment l'Allemagne nazie avait-elle transformé des pères de famille ordinaires en bourreaux de camp?

La réponse, ils ne l'ont pas trouvée chez des monstres. Ils l'ont trouvée chez des hommes parfaitement banals.

Hannah Arendt a appelé ça la banalité du mal. L'historien Christopher Browning, en étudiant le bataillon de réserve 101 (des policiers d'âge mûr, des pères, des commerçants), a montré que ce ne sont pas des fanatiques qui ont fusillé des civils, mais des hommes normaux incapables de désobéir au cadre dominant.

Puis vint Milgram. À Yale, environ deux tiers de gens ordinaires ont infligé ce qu'ils croyaient être des décharges mortelles, simplement parce qu'une autorité en blouse blanche le leur ordonnait. L'expérience de la prison de Stanford a montré la même chose sous un autre angle: donnez à quelqu'un un rôle et un cadre, et il s'y conformera jusqu'à l'inhumain.

La leçon n'est pas allemande. Elle est humaine.

Le mécanisme s'active dès qu'un cadre moral dominant fait craindre la sanction sociale plus que ne compte le témoignage de ses propres yeux. L'individu cesse de voir ce qu'il voit. Il voit ce que le cadre l'autorise à voir.

Maintenant, regardez Southampton.

Henry Nowak, 18 ans, poignardé, allongé au sol, répète aux policiers « j'ai été poignardé », « je ne peux plus respirer ».

Réponse de l'officier: « I don't think you have, mate. »

Pendant ce temps, son meurtrier retourne la situation d'une phrase: il aurait été victime d'une agression raciste. Quatre mots ont suffi pour déplacer le soupçon de l'agresseur vers la victime.

Et l'officier a obéi. Pas à un ordre. À un cadre.

Un cadre qui lui a appris, pendant des années, qu'une plainte pour racisme est l'accusation la plus dangereuse de sa carrière. Plus dangereuse, dans son réflexe conditionné, qu'un corps qui se vide de son sang devant lui.

Exactement le mécanisme de Milgram, de Browning. Un homme normal qui cesse de croire ses propres yeux parce qu'un cadre moral lui a appris ce qu'il devait craindre.

C'est précisément ça qui me terrifie.

Souvenez-vous: le monde entier s'est agenouillé pour quatre mots, « I can't breathe ». Des entreprises, des gouvernements, des stades entiers.

Henry a prononcé les mêmes mots, en train de mourir. Il n'y aura ni genou à terre, ni hashtag, ni minute de silence.

Parce que sa mort ne sert pas le cadre. Elle le contredit.

Et un système qui apprend à une société entière à faire passer l'accusation de racisme avant les faits, avant le corps, avant la vie, n'est pas une posture morale inoffensive.

C'est une machine à fabriquer des hommes qui, face à un enfant en train de mourir, choisissent les menottes.

[Konstantin Kisin @KonstantinKisin]

Britain had a moment of silence for George Floyd. Our politicians kneeled en masse to show their outrage at his killing. "I can't breathe" became a slogan.

George Floyd died on the other side of the world. He wasn't British.

Henry Nowak *was* British and his treatment by the police was shocking and negligent in the extreme. Yet there is no minute of silence. There is no coordinated public campaign. There is no kneeling at sporting events.

And we all know why.

During the summer of BLM, some people said "All Lives Matter". This was treated as the highest form of racism and anyone who said this was immediately cancelled. Why? Because the people in charge don't actually think all lives matter in the same way.

They have created a racial hierarchy of victimhood where a career criminal who died through mistreatment by police in a foreign country with 0 evidence of racism like George Floyd is automatically sanctified because of the colour of his skin.

And Henry Nowak, a British man, one of ours, is automatically dismissed and ignored because of the colour of his.

This is the ugly fruit of so-called "anti-racism", an obsession with race that has created a two-tier society which treats people differently because of the colour of their skin.

This needs to stop.

[Basil the Great @BasilTheGreat]

This you protesting the vigil of Henry Nowak just two days ago?

[Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 @TRobinsonNewEra]

This is his fourth post about the Champions League final.

Not once has he mentioned Henry Nowak.

Say his name!

[Stokeman @anglopjdst]

@Channel4News “There is no two-tier policing” says the National Black Police Association. The National White Police Association couldn’t be reached for comment on account of it not existing.

[Remix News & Views @RMXnews]

🇫🇷🔴"He’s scared, he’s scared... Why are you trembling like a trembling d**k? You’re scared? You son of a wh*re?"

"I’ll f**k your mother, you wh*re.... Go die, old man, go die."

Syrian "asylum seekers" are filming themselves harassing random French people near the Eiffel Tower, including this elderly vulnerable man.

One of the thugs manages a social media account with 167,000 followers, which means they are likely making ad money on these videos.

In other clips, they intimidate joggers, young women, and other vulnerable people in multiple European countries, with a number of different Syrians participating in these vicious viral videos.

[Loïc @Fremond_]

We did it. We've gone full circle. The left is now unironically saying "all lives matter". Only 6 years on from George Floyd.

10/10.

[Niall Ferguson @nfergus]

"You are not likely to see Henry Nowak’s words stenciled on a mural. No corporation will change its logo. The same establishment that made a few words immortal when spoken by a black man in Minneapolis has met the same words, spoken by a white boy dying on a British street, with what can only be described as a determined, institutional silence. That silence is not neutral. It is a statement. It tells you exactly whose suffering the system has decided counts, and whose does not."

[Seth Frantzman @sfrantzman]

What is the protocol and training for law enforcement in the UK if they arrive at a scene and one man who is standing and healthy says “this man said something racist and hit me” and the other man is curled up on the ground, incapacitated and says “I can’t breathe, I’ve been stabbed.”

Two men. One is on the ground unable to move, clearly the weaker and less threatening party to the incident.

Why would police immediately handcuff the man on the ground. No interview or discussion with him. No examination. No assistance or aid rendered. No investigation, just automatically handcuff one man, the obviously weaker and incapacitated one; and leave the other man standing without handcuffs?

What procedure leads to this. The man on the ground didn’t threaten anyone, he was barely able to speak. He said he’d been stabbed. But police automatically believed the stronger party, the one standing over him.

Why?

What training and doctrine tells them to arrive at a scene and automatically believe one man, among two, who claimed to have been in an altercation? And why would they handcuff a person who can barely move and already be reading him his rights without ANY investigation or interviewing both parties.

The dying man on the ground wasn’t armed or dangerous or doing anything. Why would he immediately be placed in handcuffs. What’s the procedure that leads to that.

Anyone in the UK or visiting the UK should want to know. If one is a victim of assault or a stabbing how does one not get handcuffed for being the victim?

What could the victim have done or said so that police wouldn’t immediately handcuff him and accuse him and basically judge him guilty without interviewing both parties to the altercation they believed had taken place?

Is there anything that the victim could have done to get police to render assistance? He said he had been stabbed and couldn’t breathe. Two officers (at least two) dismissed this and automatically judged him guilty and were inclined not to believe him.

What training tells an officer that they shouldn’t believe a wounded person who is curled up on the ground saying he has been stabbed…and instead believe the stronger man standing over him?

What is the protocol and training that leads to this?

It should be investigated and the entire training changed so police are trained to render aid and assist and not automatically believe the perpetrator of a crime and dismiss the victim

This isn’t “he said-he said” or “both sides”…they never interviewed the dying person, Henry Nowak; they just put him in handcuffs. Why?

Everyone should be shocked by this case and demand more answers

We need to know why the officers did this. Anyone walking the streets of the UK should want to know.

[Magda Lewandowska @MLewandowska]

Czytam sobie o sikhach i ich, wprowadzonym w 1699r, religijnym obowiązku noszenia kirpanów (ceremonialnych mieczy), który to religijny obowiązek jest szanowany/uznawany na całym Zachodzie, w tym w Polsce.

Uważam, że katolicy powinni mieć religijny obowiązek noszenia dwuręcznych mieczy, na podstawie wezwania papieża Urbana II na soborze w Clermont w 1095.