@RBReich I don't agree with what certain people say on Twitter, but it has arguably become a public forum... The NFL is not the government either, so this is an illogical comparison.
@RivCoDoc Not everyone with an advanced science and medical degree agrees with shutting down completely.
There is a middle ground that news outlets and politicians refuse to acknowledge, but most logical individuals agree with.
@CaSupremeCourt please recognize the bar causes multiple issues. There is no need for this. If the exam was proven to evaluate competency the circumstances would be slightly different.
However, with the lack of such evidence no one can logically believe the bar is necessary.
Diploma privilege for 2020 grads is a civil rights issue. There is a generation of BIPOC law grads who, with obstacles from absurd in-person and highly problematic remote exams, will be excluded from profession. Access right is a civil right. @diplomaprivileg @BarExamTracker
@DBRodriguez5@fight4DPinTx@diplomaprivileg @BarExamTracker There are multiple issues with the bar, and to me, this is one of them.
Why do courts fight for an exam that causes such large problems when there is no evidence of its effectiveness?
Courts need to be able to adjust to new problems, and this year, most of them failed to do so
@CaSupremeCourt you said there are many schools that wouldn't make the cut for DP. The cut it's up to you. You can allow those who are registered for the exam the option of DP. Don't create a catastrophe we all know it's going to occur with an online bar
https://t.co/Jv1pkaAyWm
A recent impact statement:
"[A]fter seeing the true colors of the members and leaders of the legal profession in response to us pointing out the genuine struggles we face in this new world and the concerns we bare, that bar card isn’t worth the paper it’s printed on."
@XicanaRebelde@CaSupremeCourt please recognize that the CA bar will be a catastrophe if MI had problems. MI is a smaller state, there weren't other states taking an online bar, and it was substantially shorter than the CA bar. Please don't wait until a disaster occurs to address the problem
@DiplomaPriv4All It's sad, but the courts showed that they literally don't care about test takers at all. If the contrary were true they would have taken our concerns into consideration.
It appears that many courts would rather fail everyone than to do something new.
@CaSupremeCourt please recognize that there are already mechanisms in place to protect the public. The public will not be harmed.
This year has been hell and you have an opportunity to help alleviate some of the pain. Please do the right thing and put an end to this madness.
Glad to see; more will likely join. I expect Annette Clark @seattleulawdean will, as @seattleulaw unanimous faculty letter led to DP in WA, following student-led efforts.
An Open Letter on the 2020 Bar Exam from Law Deans by @ProfessorMutch https://t.co/Iqvd6rs0ZF
In a new piece for JURIST @LeanLawStrategy discusses the shortcomings of the #BarExam and calls on #DiplomaPrivilege advocates to continue their passion once they gain licensure and channel it into reforming our profession. Read his excellent article here: https://t.co/r8WWzkxBdb
@DBRodriguez5 What a joke. I used their software before and it went terribly. It's well known among law school students that examsoft is not a reliable program.
I thank examsoft for helping to keep bluebook companies around.