Aiden O'Neill 🇺🇸

Ba/Ba/Booey

[Aiden O'Neill 🇺🇸 @Not_AidenONeill]

Why is everyone acting like Dani is being crazy out of nowhere? #GameofThrones

[tay 🖤 @tayylorrmaee]

at what point does our government get off their ass and help? return the fucking courtesy after Canada helped with the california wildfires??

[Aiden O'Neill 🇺🇸 @Not_AidenONeill]

@DiscussingFilm Didn’t watch the leak, I hope all who did support the film on its actual release!

[Aiden O'Neill 🇺🇸 @Not_AidenONeill]

@PlayStation No disc, no purchase

[blue @bluewmist]

i'm in love with this quote:

"if you're persistent, you'll get it. if you're consistent, you'll keep it. and if you're grateful, you'll attract more of it."

[Aiden O'Neill 🇺🇸 @Not_AidenONeill]

@undisputed104 No NHL either so World Cup holding me over

[Aditya Mishra @adityamtweets]

Assume the movie had flopped and the director lost his entire $750,000 investment. How many crew members would have voluntarily returned their fees to help offset his loss?

This is the fundamental asymmetry in risk and reward. When someone puts up their own capital and shoulders the real financial risk especially in a high-failure industry like entertainment they alone bear the downside.

Yet the moment the project succeeds, suddenly everyone who was paid upfront wants a bigger piece of the pie. The same people who would not have shared in the loss now feel entitled to share disproportionately in the upside.

If you accept payment for your work regardless of outcome, you’ve already been compensated for your risk (or lack thereof). Why should the person who risked everything not be allowed to reap the rewards when their gamble pays off?

[Sleeper @SleeperHQ]

The Knicks the second they are down double digits

[NEW YORK KNICKS @nyknicks]

for the boroughs and Knicks fans around the world 🏆

[Greg the Sorcerer @gregthesorcerer]

By age 25, your circle should consist of:
-a Spellcaster
-a Healer
-a Tank
-and a Rogue

your network is your net worth

[𝔇𝔞𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔩 𝚟𝚜 𝔅𝔞𝔟𝔶𝔩𝔬𝔫 @DanielvsBabylon]

Please don’t take the black pill of men/women relations that this site if feeding all of you. It’s all fake, gay, and staged. Life is beautiful. Good girls are out there, good guys are out there. Go be the best version of yourself and you’ll see. Never doom.

[定 @de3dsoul]

I grew up playing games like this, so don't ask me to act normal

[Top 1% Men @dtop1percentmen]

Less talking, more doing

[AnechoicMedia @AnechoicMedia_]

In CCW class they tell you you have a heightened duty to avoid potential fights while armed, as a matter of legal and practical self-preservation. You don't want to raise the stakes to death in a fight, and you don't want to have to argue to a jury later about whether you provoked a fight while armed to bait someone into a self-defense situation.

The anti-ICE protestors have inverted the duties of being an armed citizen (or a citizen in control of a lethal instrument, like a car in a traffic stop). They are deliberately creating situations of maximum ambiguity with a low level threat of lethal danger to bait law enforcement into making them heroic victims or martyrs.

Being an "observer" of law enforcement, while also armed and getting into shoving distance with them, is just a bad idea, even if you think the law empowers you to play the "I'm not touching you" game with acts of defiance or minor assaults. It's also hazardous to the public trust to create a situation in which every protestor is regarded as a potential threat, and every cop seen to be on the edge of shooting someone.

I can't tell from the video whether this guy drew his gun at any point in the struggle. Regardless, getting into a struggle with a cop while armed has a serious chance of ending in your death. Even if the resulting shoot is ruled unjustified or in error, you're still dead, which is only good for people who profit from chaos and mistrust (protestors who cause is bad).

The shooting will not have been *unjust* or criminal, just a tragedy. It's also not proof of government oppression, because every government has to enforce laws, and you can't use the chaos of choosing to interfere with law enforcement as proof that having laws is unjust.

[The Moderate Case @TheModerateCase]

The same “tolerant” left that said “I’m not supporting it, but I won’t lose sleep over it” when people were openly celebrating violence against Charlie Kirk now demands “SAY HIS NAME” and “SAY HER NAME” over Renee Good and Alex Pretti in Minnesota.

So which is it?

Either human life matters even when you disagree with someone, or outrage is just a political tool you pull out when it benefits your side.

You don’t get to be emotionally detached when violence targets someone you dislike, then morally performative when it fits your narrative.

[Zack Voell @zackvoell]

“Yes I feel fully recharged after a restful holiday”

[Phil Kocher @PhilKocher]

#NYR need to rebuild ... the ceiling of MSG to be retractable.

[Gabe Perreault Fan @nyronly]

Mika Zibanejad in outdoor games for whatever reason

#NYR

[Ryan Mead @OhRyanMead]

Me 2 mins ago:

hockey is so stupid and I hate this team

Me now:

[2000s @PopCulture2000s]

POV: it’s the last day at school before winter break in the early 2000s