@LockedOnMavs I can't go wrong with any of them. Wagler is a scorer, MBJ is a shooting guard, and Burries is like a Dlive at combo guard; strong, versatile, and talented.
All of them are incredibly talented at their positions.
@CurseMuse Kidd reached two Finals against teams he had no chance against in his first and third seasons. Before that, in Milwaukee, he coached a young, inexperienced team that couldn't compete. Aside from some questionable practices, I'd be hard-pressed to find anyone better.
@BillyReinhardt Ahh, but now teams ranked 4-10 will have to win more games... I don't think that's a bad thing. Wizards, Kings, etc., are bad teams used to being bad, and they shouldn't be desperate for any reason.
@SamQuinnCBS They're already getting help. They have better odds of getting a top 5 pick than 16 teams, and a guaranteed top 12 selection in the least likely outcome. If they can't improve organically, it's a more serious organizional franchise problem.
@KeithSmithNBA@spotrac If Klay leaves, they can keep Khris, or a backup like Payton Pritchard: fast, physical, with a shot. Bagley doesn't fits the team. Poulakidas should back. Powell for the min. Williams doesn't fit with Kyrie, keeping Nembhar, and adding rookies. One young great shooter in the FA
Están los actores "de método", técnica interpretativa con la que se sumergen totalmente en el personaje.
Luego está Alison Lohman en #DragMeToHell, abriendo la boca para recibir gusanos y larvas reales.
Supéralo Daniel Day-Lewis.
@J_the_ManSelden@DGhustla305@DanWolken A bad team, say 14th or 15th in its conference, that can't even climb to 12th place after two years of having a quality draft pick (between five and tenth), is terribly managed. Talking about being "midle of the order" for moving up two or three places is pretty stupid.
@J_the_ManSelden@DGhustla305@DanWolken Ultimately, those teams that were really bad just need to climb to seeds 11 or 12 to qualify for the best picks and take a bigger leap. It makes development more organic and competitive.
@J_the_ManSelden@DGhustla305@DanWolken If you ensure that the teams with the four or six worst records get picks between 5th and 10th, that's enough for them to become competitive quickly if managed well. The top five picks will go to weaker teams that at least tried to compete. Let's say up to seed 11 or 12.
@J_the_ManSelden@DGhustla305@DanWolken Bad teams shouldn't go from last place to leading the league in a couple of years, like Pistons or SAS. But if you're at the bottom and you're given the opportunity to add quality picks, be able to compete for the seeds that give you access to top picks in a short amount of time.
@BrettSiegelNBA Another option could be to block the first five picks with the 7th through 11th seeds in each conference, creating a mini-lottery for those ten teams with fairly even odds, and then draw the remaining picks, up to the 14th or 18th, etc.
@BrettSiegelNBA It reverses the odds and penalizes the last one or two seeds in each conference. So the lottery would be from 8 to 14, with the 8th place having the highest probability of getting the top pick, for example. The last seed get the picks immediately after the lottery.