🚨🇧🇷 TAKE A LOOK AT BRAZIL’S HISTORICAL VOTER TURNOUT!
From 2002 to 2018, fewer Brazilians voted in the second round of every presidential election than in the first. The explanation is that some voters simply lost interest after their preferred candidate was eliminated.
But in 2022, when Bolsonaro lost to Lula in Biden-style fashion, that pattern reversed: 570,424 MORE people voted in the second round. Odd.
And in 2026? An additional 2,960,239 voters! Lula, the phenomenon, did the impossible! RESPECT! 🫡
Now, looking at this election once again. You only need to examine the difference in voter turnout between the first and second rounds and ask yourself: Did everything really happen legitimately?
Unfortunately, Brazil’s electronic voting system does not provide a voter-verifiable paper trail that would allow the ballots to be independently recounted by hand.
And that is precisely the problem. Alexandre de Moraes REMOVED the paper-based verification mechanism in 2018.
You read it right: IN 2018!!!
And everything that has happened since 2018?
Well, let the numbers speak for themselves.
El otro día salieron muchos tardígrados a decir que en las 2hs sólo se agregaron 30k votos. Lo que no te dicen es que esas horas no eran para que voten sino para falsificar la transmisión de datos. Lo hicieron tan mal que dejaron municipios completos con cero voto para Bolsonaro.
Feinman, Trebuq y el resto de los periodistas que se supone que no son kukas te informaron mal y para colmo te dijeron conspiranoico.
Ahora empiezan a disimular.
No consumas medios inútiles.
Color Revolution Coup Unfolds in Real Time:
My Markey video hit over 527k views.
Votebeat’s Editor in Chief, previously served as research director at (CREW), the group co-founded by Norman L. Eisen.
Make this one go viral as well. It is also downloadable so share with your community.
Last night, David Farley MP brought the following matters to the attention of the leadership of One Nation.
Over the past few weeks, the Prime Minister has met with David privately. The Prime Minister initiated these meetings. This week, David received a letter from the Prime Minister stating that he had allocated David a personal staff position outside of One Nation’s unresolved staffing request. David did not request this allocation of staff. No reason was provided by the Prime Minister for the provision of this staff.
Following these discussions, senior ministers raised grant funding under the Sustainable Communities Program for the Murray Darling Basin. David did not initiate the discussion regarding this program.
Taken together, these actions have left David and One Nation deeply concerned that the government is seeking to use taxpayer funds to exert undue political influence over politicians.
We have decided to expose these grubby dealings because the public deserves to know what the Albanese Labor government is doing behind closed doors.
For months, One Nation has been fighting for fair, transparent and objective allocation of staffing for parliamentarians. The Prime Minister has refused to respond to these calls.
Yet astonishingly, this week the Prime Minister provided a letter to David directly granting a Personal Adviser 3 position, paid up to $200,000, effective immediately. David has rejected this unsolicited allocation.
Last month, One Nation Senator Pauline Hanson stood alongside the Member for Fowler, Dai Le MP and Senator for Western Australia, Fatima Payman to demand consistent, transparent and independently determined staffing allocations.
They stood together despite their political differences because this matters to our democracy. The Prime Minister should not personally control the resources available to his political opponents.
While this power has always been open to abuse, it has, in our view, been weaponised to an unprecedented extent under this Labor Government and this Prime Minister. One Nation introduced our Safe Staffing Guarantee Bill to stop this abuse of power. Labor, the Coalition and the Greens all united to block the Bill.
This is the type of politics that Australians are sick of. The Prime Minister is trying to drag One Nation down to his level of grubby politics. One Nation will have no part of it.
The second issue that needs to be brought into the open is the way in which the Albanese Labor government appears to be using public grant money to achieve their political objectives and paper over policy failures.
The government has directly raised the prospect of grants available to the Murray Darling Basin under the Sustainable Communities Program as compensation for water buybacks.
David and One Nation will always fight for Farrer’s fair share of public resources, but we will never allow grant funding to buy cooperation or silence on the issue of water advocacy, implicit or otherwise. We know the number one thing Farrer and other basin communities need is water. One Nation does not accept that devastating water buybacks are a foregone conclusion. A future One Nation government will end water buybacks.
This government’s actions are the type of broken politics that undermines the confidence Australians have in our democracy. It’s what Professor Anne Twomey has described as ‘grey corruption’.
One Nation will always stand up for the interests of all Australians. We won’t be bought or divided by this Prime Minister.
ENDS
Here is the TGA obfuscating again, this time over 50 infant deaths reported with just one childhood vaccine - Infanrix Hexa.
The truth is that they never investigated these deaths, because that would risk stopping the flow of money to them from pharma.
@SenatorAntic@DrJulieSladden@MaryanneDemasi
CALL TO ACTION: After 8pm on Election Day, Michigan law guarantees ability to take a photo of the election tabulator tapes at nearby election day, early voting and absentee vote counting board locations.
Please visit your local poll locations and capture copies of these tapes and post them with hashtag #2026tapes noting county, municipality, precinct, and type of voting center (Election Day, Early Voting, Absentee Vote Counting Board).
If tapes have not been made available, please notify the election inspector that:
“I am an interested person present for the public precinct canvass. Under MCL 168.807, please make the completed precinct results available when the canvass is complete. The Bureau of Elections’ closing instructions call for posting one copy of the totals tape.”
If met with obstruction, contact local law enforcement and advise them of the violation of statute.
Please ensure that you capture full length of each tabulator tape. The beginning and end (should be signed by poll inspectors) are especially important.
Why important?
- Documents vote tally audit trail should results of election be in question
- Votes have been observed to have flipped between tabulator and certified county results
- By reviewing Zero and Results tapes, you can have increased confidence that the tabulator was not "pre-loaded" with votes
- Serial number information enables investigation into whether or not a logic and accuracy test was performed for the applicable machine
Thank you!
@RealLindellTV@kalamazoogop@MIGOP@RunWithRunestad
I HANDED CBS THE RECEIPTS... AND THEY STILL CAME BACK WITH ANOTHER TRUMP HIT PIECE?! 👀🔥
Oh, this one's PERSONAL...
I sat down with Lesley Stahl for 60 Minutes, explained the problems with federal restitution law, and even handed her team the DOCUMENTS!
But that part never aired.
Now CBS is back with another story about Trump pardons supposedly costing crime victims millions, and I've got some BIG questions about what they're leaving out!
Ever heard of the PELOSI WRAPAROUND SMEAR? Well, you're about to!
I'm naming names and breaking down this media mess in my latest WYNK on "Early Bird With Ed Martin," on @RealAmVoice!
WATCH! 👇
🚨#BREAKING: Outrage is erupting in North Carolina after an HOA just DOUBLED monthly fees to **$2,500/MONTH** for homeowners who were paying just $158/month just five years ago...
...and the homeowners say the HOA board tried to charge homeowners $7,500/MONTH JUST IN HOA FEES!!!!!!!
On Monday night, the board backed off $7,500...
...but voted to DOUBLE fees to $2,500 a month instead.
Yes, $30,000 a year just to LIVE IN YOUR HOME THAT YOU BOUGHT.
Nearly SIXTEEN TIMES what families were paying a few years ago.
Families who bought what they thought were their forever homes are now being told to pay $30,000 a year in HOA fees, or GO INTO FORECLOSURE!!!!!!
The neighborhood is Magnolia Cove in Sherrills Ford, Catawba County NC.
Jill Menson and her husband bought their house believing it would be their LAST home and five years ago, their HOA fee was $158 a month.
This summer it shot up to more than $1,200.
Plus a $10,000 ASSESSMENT on top of that.
On Monday night, the HOA board voted to raise fees AGAIN, from $1,250 to $2,500 a month.
That’s nearly SIXTEEN TIMES what they paid five years ago.
And the meeting?
It was held over ZOOM.
Menson says they’ll be forced out with nowhere to go, because no one will buy a house carrying fees like that.
So they went to the state for help.
The North Carolina Attorney General’s office told Channel 9 there are NO STATUTES limiting how much an HOA can charge.
None.
As long as the board follows its own documents, it can charge whatever it wants.
In Jill Menson’s words:
“Nobody is helping us.”
THIS IS ABSOLUTELY ABSURD AND SHOULD BE ILLEGAL!!!!!!!!!!
Here is Rob Reiner conspiring w. John Brennan and Jim Clapper to overthrow the democratically-elected President Trump as part of the Russiagate Conspiracy.
What was Reiner's connection to the CIA?
Who financed this op?
This journalist is part of the problem with the media - she came with a pre-conceived position that was reflected in her question but she really didn’t know much about the subject & it showed. A triumph of opinion over knowledge that collapsed in the face of the truth.
Depois de muito dialogar aqui no X sobre as mais variadas teorias de fraude, e encontrar inconsistência lógica em todas, por mais que eu já tenha identificado padrões suspeitos em 2014 e 2022 (que são os mesmos de 2026, mas curiosamente as pessoas só estão percebendo agora), fiz um levantamento dos votos de todas as eleições presidenciais do PT e de todos os seus adversários, no primeiro e no segundo turno.
Vejam que curioso:
Em 1989, a disputa foi franca no primeiro e no segundo turno. Lula conseguiu 31,1 milhões no segundo turno e Collor 35,1 milhões. Votação 100% no papel.
Em 1994, Lula com 17,1 milhões perde no primeiro turno para FHC com 34,4 milhões (um pouco menos que o Collor teve no segundo turno). Votação 100% no papel.
Em 1998, Lula cresce bem pouco e faz 21,5 milhões contra 35,9 milhões do FHC (um pouco acima que Collor em 1989). A votação foi mista, 60% urnas eletrônicas e 40% papel.
Em 2002, Lula já aparece no primeiro turno com 39,5 milhões de votos contra 19,7 milhões do Serra. Parece que o povo inverteu e passou a apoiar o Lula, não é? Mas aí vem o segundo turno e o Serra faz 33,4 milhões de votos mantém a média dos votos de todos os adversários do PT no segundo turno desde 1989, e o Lula aparece com impressionantes 52,8 milhões de votos. A eleição nesse ano pela primeira vez foi 100% com urnas eletrônicas.
Alguém consegue me explicar como o Lula conseguiu 91,98% dos votos somados dele e do FHC em apenas 4 anos, se o Serra manteve o padrão de votos do FHC em 1994 e 1998 e do Collor em 1989?
O máximo que o Lula conseguiu de votos foi 31,1 milhões em 1989 e a soma de Collor e Lula foi de 66,2 milhões de votos, como apareceram 20 milhões de eleitores a mais em 2002 se por 13 anos o padrão era 66,2 milhões em 1989, 51,5 milhões em 1994 e 57,4 milhões em 1998?
Agora vem a parte dois da curiosidade:
Depois de 2002, de repente, o PT virou uma máquina imbatível: Lula faz 46,7 milhões no primeiro turno de 2006, o Alckmin sobe um pouco a média dos adversários e faz 40 milhões, mas no segundo turno volta pra média e impressionantemente PERDE VOTOS e faz 37,5 milhões, enquanto Lula mantém o foguete surpreendente de 58,3 milhões.
Em 2010, Dilma se sai melhor que o Lula e já entra no primeiro turno com 47,7 milhões enquanto o Serra mantém o mesmo padrão histórico de 33,1 milhões de votos. No segundo turno ele sobe pra 43,7 milhões e a Dilma se sai melhor que o Lula em 2002 e faz 55,8 milhões.
Em 2014, ano da Copa do Mundo, a revolta contra o PT já vem desde 2013 e atingiu seu ápice no ano da eleição, e a Dilma se sai pior que em 2010, tanto no primeiro quanto no segundo turno, com 43,3 milhões e depois 54,5 milhões, seguindo a marca inalcançável de foi estabelecida desde 2002 desses 20 milhões de votos hegemônicos, enquanto o Aécio simplesmente mantém OS MESMOS 34,9 milhões de votos que acompanham o lado adversário desde 1989, mas com a força das manifestações ele conseguiu impressionantes 51 milhões de votos, mas que não vence o muro de 20 milhões do PT.
Veio o impeachment da Dilma em 2016, Temer altera algumas peças e há uma quebra do padrão. Haddad faz O MESMO PADRÃO de 31,3 milhões do Lula de 1989 na eleição de 2018, e Jair Bolsonaro consegue romper o muro fazendo 57,8 milhões no segundo turno contra 47 milhões do Haddad.
Curiosamente, mesmo tendo mais votos em 2022 e 2026 do que em 2018, os adversários não conseguem mais pular o muro do PT, porque ele expandiu para 60,3 milhões e agora 64,3 milhões.
Meus caros, eis a mágica que mantém o PT 20 anos no poder. Um muro mágico de 20 milhões de votos que não somem nem com os piores escândalos de corrupção, nem com petistas fundando outros partidos por descontentamento, nem com pessoas virando ex-esquerdistas.
Alguém consegue me explicar de onde vieram esses 20 milhões de votos eternos no PT?
CBS 60 Minutes sat with me for nearly 2 hours.
They put out more than 10 posts promoting that interview on their X
They used 1 minute and 17 seconds.
This is part one. The real answers to the questions they asked.
Joe Rogan thought it was fake news when he heard Brazil bulldozed the Amazon rainforest to host a climate summit.
ROGAN: “That sounds like horsesh*t.”
Then Jamie pulled up the BBC…
ROGAN: “Oh my god. It’s real!”
Brazil cut a four-lane highway through tens of thousands of acres of protected rainforest so COP30 attendees wouldn’t get stuck in traffic.
ROGAN: “You’re chopping down trees to protest chopping down trees.”
Joe’s deep sigh at the end says it all.
CRAZY SCENES IN GRAVELINES, NORTHERN FRANCE!
A large group of illegal migrants openly making their way through this small, beautiful French town towards the beach.
I suspect they are preparing for an attempted crossing to Britain tomorrow.
No authorities in sight. No oversight. No attempt to hide.
Just another extraordinary scene unfolding in broad daylight.
Gravelines, France | 28 October 2026
🔥🚨DEVELOPING: A 77-year-old woman says a man who "looked like a monster" shoved her aside and picked up her 24-year-old friend in broad daylight, and it's reportedly all on surveillance video.
. @uneedsoap has found @GovCox and the entire "Disagree Better" network including Braver Angels in the Democracy Files.
That this starts in September 2026 is interesting.