I think this guy here needs to stay off politics as he has partial to zero knowledge on what geo-politics is all about.
Talking from a place of zero hatred. Stay off it akhi!
I do not know how saying Osama did not have the capacity to actually carry out the attacks becomes defending him or hypocrisy.
Also, a terrorist claiming an attack is not proof he did it. Terrorists are known to falsely claim attacks for various reasons, amongst which is psychological warfare. A terrorist organisation claiming responsibility for something that makes it look like the group is more capable than it is, is nothing more than a tactic used to advance its political or ideological narrative.
This isn't even a new thing, terrorists have done this before, also, declaring it permissible or a duty to kill Americans according to him is not proof he is responsible. Whether he actually did it or not is subject to independent scrutiny and investigation. Independent evidence is what will stand as fact here, not his "Fatwa" in Arabic . We can disown his ideology as not part of Islam and also make the claim he didn't do it. It's the best way to strip his likes of all power. Especially when there are expert analyses that point to the possibility of 9/11 not being bin Laden's handiwork .
There's ample evidence that make bin Laden's claim over the attack questionable. So many experts on terrorism, intelligence and Engineering have questioned the claim.
In the video below, Netanyahu admits to predicting the attack on the world trade center back in 1995โdon't you find this at least questionable? And in the link below. Many questions worth looking into are logically laid out and discussed. There's no actual evidence that he did it asides his claim, and his so called Fatwa is not evidence he did it. If this were the case then almost all of the radical terrorist groups have a valid claim to it, since most of them also believe it's their God given right to kill Americans.
Besides, Bin Laden explicitly denying his involvement in the first few weeks and later making a claim to it puts a huge question mark on the claim that he's responsible. It makes no sense to deny it when you've publicly declared war against a state. It's all advantage for you if you do.
It's very typical of terrorists to claim attacks they didn't carry out. Shekau even claimed an explosion that turned out to be caused by a separate cause in an attempt to spread more fear once upon a time. He had also made statements that he would go to Saudi and get Sudais. Had something funny happened he would definitely want to claim it for psychological warfare reasons.
https://t.co/Zwp6QWYEhq
If I were to see Osama now, I would ask him one question: who sent you on the atrocities you embarked upon when you were alive?
And I will say this again to people. Just because you hate Israel, does that mean you have to lie against them? I hope you all prepare your defense in the sight of the Almighty.
Remember Allah said:
ููุง ูุฌุฑู ููู ุดูุขู ููู ุนูู ุฃูุง ุชุนุฏููุง ุงุนุฏููุง ูู ุฃูุฑุจ ููุชููู
(And do not let the hatred of a people prevent you from being just. Be just; that is nearer to righteousness).
I am attaching the screenshot of the fatwa he made in 1998 to this post. Look at it. Read it if you can read and understand Arabic text. He explicitly commanded the killing of Americans and declared it a Fard Ayn, an individual religious obligation on every Muslim. lol ๐
We should ask these hypocrites defending him today: what was his purpose with that fatwa? What did he stand to gain by writing and publishing that mandate if he had no plans to act on it?
It was a man made fatwa. A clear hijack of Islam for his devilish motives.
In Islam, the rule says:
ุงูุฅูุฑุงุฑ ุณูุฏ ุงูุฃุฏูุฉ
Confession is the master of evidence.
Some of you say he denied it. If someone denied something initially, and later confessed in four other places that he did it both secretly and openly in videos he sent through his couriers? So we should discard them?
We should discard confessions that perfectly match his own fatwa? A confession that aligns with the hundreds of letters he sent to his lieutenants? And then we hold on to a brief denial that does not hold water?
In fact, after the 9/11, his handwritten letters showed how he planned to hijack trains. As a construction expert that he was, he was teaching his lieutenants how to wreck havoc on rail tracks, remove of bolts at strategic points to drift trains in many places in the west.
You want me to side with a beast who because of the nonsense he did, America unleashed mayhem on innocent children, men and women in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Pakistan.
All of you should prepare your defense in the sight of the Almighty where no conspiracy theories can save you from the falsehood you align yourself with.
Islam is built on truth. You cannot use falsehood to defend the truth. Osama committed too many atrocities when he was alive. His case lies in the hands of the Almighty who will judge according to his deeds.
As for me, I will never trade my intellect for cheap propaganda or compromise my religion to fit an internet narrative. Osamaโs letters and speeches are my greatest evidence. I donโt need yours.
@Msquaree_ ๐๐ Sun yi qoqarin tarjama da qara wa amarya falala ne. Duk da dai 2nd half din ba dai dai suka tarjama ba. Amma dai sun burge ni. Sunyi representing Firdausi da kyau gaskiya.๐๐
And lastly, this was the point I disliked Damonโs character:
Tyler bit Damon, he was dying, Stefan started looking for a cure for him, he found a cure (Niklausโs blood).
Niklaus said he will not heal Damon if Stefan does not follow him, Stefan left everyone (including the girl he loves) just to save Damon, Damon got healed, instead of him to respect his brother and his girlfriend, he started moving to her.
What kind of brother is that??
I hope with all these points, I have been able to convince you that Stefan Salvatore is a better person than Damon Salvatore, thank you!!!
Back to football twitter.
Oh I know a few people who believe TVD is better.๐๐
Yes, The originals is more mature given the fact that it's a redemption arc for Klaus and the Michealsons, giving him a second chance at being a better people, with Hope being the anchor that ties and bonds the family.
TVD started off as high-school romance so it would naturally be less mature, but I believe it has better story arcs and character arcs too. I mean, the Salvatore brothers had a better relationship than the Michealson brothers. The character arcs of Caroline, Damon, Stefan, Jeremy, Bonnie, Alaric and Matt were masterpieces.
The story arcs too.
The prison world, Augustine Vampires, Travellers, Heretics, Klaus and the Originals arc, the sun and moon curse and the whole werewolves backstories etc
What blows my mind the most is how good they were at acting. Nina Dobrev played Elena and Katherine, they are the exact same person, yet no one even thinks of them as being the same person, the execution was so top-notch I forget they're doppelgangers. Same with Paul Wesley, he nails Stefan, no humanity ripper Stefan and Silas. Jeremy's acting was top notch too. I could go on and on.
The originals got so much love only because of TVD. It's just like Young Sheldon, you enjoy it because of Big bang Theory. One can't help but wonder what the life of Sheldon as a kid was. For BBT and it's spin-off, I think young Sheldon is the better series. But between TVD and the Originals, I pick TVD. TVD is clear. ๐๐