@SebastianG_De Erster Fehler: „alle“ Bürgergeldempfänger. Es gibt Menschen, die können das schlicht nicht, z. B. weil sie alleinerziehend sind und es keine gescheite Kinderbetreuung gibt. Deine „Wer sich weigert“-Attitüde ist zum Kotzen.
@TimKoffiziell Haha, bist du nicht der Typ, der zum dritten Mal erfolglos versucht, irgendeinen Youtuber zu verklagen? Komm Alter, geh endlich scheißen oder lerne, in der Sache zu argumentieren.
Many seem to be misunderstanding some of the fundamental principles with which Bitcoin open-source development has been working with for over 15 years. Let me clarify, respectfully:
- Core is a group of professionals that cares about Bitcoin as a monetary system more than any other group that exists.
- Changing OP_RETURN limits has nothing to do with JPGs but was prompted by second-layer solutions that make Bitcoin more useful as money, not "arbitrary data storage". That's a made-up argument, and inscriptions will always be more "useful" for JPGs (I hate JPGs personally).
- The devs don't work for you. You don't pay them, you don't control them, you don't elect them, you don't hire them, nor can you fire them. This is how open-source has always worked. If you want to change something, you need to persuade other devs in the professional arena, in a professional setting. Not by causing drama on socials or brigading GitHub.
- The devs don't need the permission or consensus of "the plebs" - whatever that means. They need consensus amongst themselves only.
- Even if it were so, there is no way to measure the "consensus of plebs" or even define who they are. Opinions in Bitcoin are expressed by running software, not by voting. It's technically and philosophically impossible to measure "the consensus of plebs". We don't vote.
- Even if you could measure it, the "consensus of plebs" clearly shows that the vast majority of users support Core. Knots is a niche opinion and most people wouldn't want to run it. 17% (which can't be proven, i.e. could be fake) is not "consensus".
- The most important part: BITCOIN GIVES YOU AGENCY. YOU ARE ALREADY FREE. It's beautiful and people seem to misunderstand what this whole thing is about. You can't force anyone to upgrade their software, anyone can choose to run whatever they want. You control your destiny, it's not the team of Core or Luke or anybody else. You are responsible for what you do.
I respect you. These are points I'd make to anyone else having this debate. I'm not worried about Bitcoin's success, and it's not meant to sound alarmist. Peace.
@zeitonline Wow @zeitonline ... selten so einen verfehlten Mist von euch gelesen. Alle dürfen es krachen lassen, nur Habek nicht? Er hat mit allen Aussagen recht, aber ihr nennt es "schimpfen".