O1D Match

[O1D Match @O1dMatch2026]

We're hiring remote builders 🛠️

Squarespace · conversion tracking · n8n · Next.js/Supabase · iOS · Claude Code

Strong in 2-3 is enough. Apply with a 10-min AI skills chat:
https://t.co/aKoJdCZoOr

Score 30%+ on our O-1 check = free O1D Match profile.

[O1D Match @O1dMatch2026]

An employer interest letter is not a work permit.

It can document planned work. It does not itself authorize that work.

Interest starts the conversation. The approved petition and the person's status control authorization.

[O1D Match @O1dMatch2026]

3 O-1 criteria don't equal automatic approval.

They open the review. USCIS still asks whether the full record shows sustained acclaim and top-of-field standing.

Count the criteria. Then test the whole story.

[O1D Match @O1dMatch2026]

Your job title is not O-1 evidence.

"VP" can sound impressive and still leave the real question unanswered: what changed because of your work?

The title names the role. The record must prove responsibility and impact.

[O1D Match @O1dMatch2026]

O-1 visa for founders: a company you own can be the petitioner.

The guidance moved toward you. Read that again if you're building something.

[O1D Match @O1dMatch2026]

O-1 criterion: awards.

It doesn't have to be a Nobel. A well-known hackathon or a real industry prize, in a real field, can count.

[O1D Match @O1dMatch2026]

O-1 criterion: judging the work of others.

Conference review, hackathon judging, even senior-level review panels can count with the right framing.

[O1D Match @O1dMatch2026]

Most tech people finish counting and realise they're at 2 or 3 O-1 criteria, not 0.

A conference talk, a senior role, a patent, a well-used open-source project. They all count.

[O1D Match @O1dMatch2026]

O-1 visa for software engineers and data scientists.

Most rule themselves out assuming it's for Nobel winners. Almost half of these visas went to people in science and technology.

[O1D Match @O1dMatch2026]

"Scholarly articles" makes every engineer skip this criterion.

No papers? A widely read technical deep dive can count.

[O1D Match @O1dMatch2026]

For the O-1 press criterion you don't need to be in the news.

You need your work covered by someone with a real audience.

[O1D Match @O1dMatch2026]

"Membership in associations requiring outstanding achievement" sounds academic.

An invite-only fellowship counts. So can maintainer status on a serious open-source project.

[O1D Match @O1dMatch2026]

Almost every engineer counts their own O-1 criteria wrong.

They miss 2 they already qualify for, and claim 1 they don't.

[O1D Match @O1dMatch2026]

There are 8 criteria for the O-1.

You don't need all 8. You need 3.

[O1D Match @O1dMatch2026]

You don't have to squeeze your career into a professor's box.

No papers because you're in industry? A major industry talk can count instead.

[O1D Match @O1dMatch2026]

The comparable evidence rule is in the government's own handbook.

It's the reason engineers who "don't fit the list" often still qualify.

[O1D Match @O1dMatch2026]

The problem was never your record.

It's that you were reading a rulebook you didn't know had changed.

[O1D Match @O1dMatch2026]

The sponsorship risk never sits with your company.

No annual cap. No random selection. No filing season to plan your hiring around.

[O1D Match @O1dMatch2026]

A studio casts an actor. The studio does not become the actor's agent.

The O-1 works the same way. Your company is not the petitioner.

[O1D Match @O1dMatch2026]

You don't need to have run the company.

You need to have mattered to one that mattered.