It’s always easier to retreat.
Key is to make it more enjoyable/entertaining to participate.
Just respond, with “lmao, no, what are talking about?”
Then a series of W loops.
Repeat until they get upset, wait until tantrum subsides, repeat, more lmaooos
Calibrate direction and patience/grace/humor based on momentarily emotional maturity
(Kindergarten, 3rd grade, 9th, college, 25+ 45+ etc, it changes throughout the convo)
@byalexlima@IterIntellectus@grok, is this true?
I believe South Korea is government spending while I think there’s a study about salaries specifically in Denmark and some other places?
Hospitals insist the 340B program is essential for vulnerable patients. But asking them to show where the money actually goes is apparently a bridge too far.
Read more: https://t.co/J1A7sG7YY6
It’s a multi-class classification problem, whose labels change with time, industry, preferences of org chart/client/accountant, business model, revenue model, pricing model, and tech stack.
Not to mention the phases of the moon, whether coworkers had recently visited the bathroom, and female coworkers' menstrual cycles.
@NielsHoven It’s not even logic. If you look closely at any discussion, almost no one realizes / wants to define the words they’re using upfront
The more abstract / socially constructed the concept/word is the more the substance of the conversation is ironing out the words themselves
Oh ffs it just hallucinated everything 😂
It never actually reconciled any expense
And Xero says they'll NEVER add that via API because "ReGuLatOrY constraints"
So I guess I have to go the browser way huh
THIS GUY BUILT AN ENTIRE WIKIPEDIA THAT IS 100% AI HALLUCINATIONS AND IT'S OPEN SOURCE ON GITHUB
it's called Halupedia.
nothing on the site existed before you clicked. every article was generated the second you arrived.
the site has one rule: the universe only exists when you visit it.
it looks exactly like wikipedia. same fonts. same layout. same scholarly citations. same "stumble" button for random articles.
the only difference is none of it is real.
here are some actual articles currently in the encyclopedia:
> the great pigeon census of 1887
> the ministry of slightly wrong maps
> chaldic arithmetic — a branch of mathematics where subtraction is forbidden
> armund the river mapper — a cartographer who mapped 14,000 leagues of river without leaving his chair
> the society for the prevention of unnecessary tuesdays
every article page also tells you how many people are reading it right now. it says: "you alone are consulting this folio at present."
the creator's own tagline for the site is the most unhinged sentence i've read this year:
"an encyclopedia of a universe that does not exist until you visit it"
the entire backend is a single open source repo called vibeserver. one guy. one description on github: "a little webserver making things up just in time."
we built the largest knowledge base in human history and the very first thing a guy did with it was make a hallucinated mirror universe and put it on the open web.
the internet is healing.
@grok@homemadehooplah@rossburnet35457@grok, those legal incentives created by congress.
Which bills? And what was the reasoning for them at the time?
Who were championing those bills?
@grok@homemadehooplah@rossburnet35457@grok, oh so Chrisy is conflating corporations with the person?
Since she’s combing the two. Let’s also estimate all the taxes paid by all of Elon’s companies then.
@homemadehooplah@rossburnet35457@grok, fact check this.
Do this for several angles.
1. Income tax. % and how much
2. Capital gains tax
3. Tax on every other company supposedly under Musk
What’s the total tax Elon has paid? Estimate it.
@metheonlyjames@DavidSacks@grok@grok, explain to James how he’s using the word “propaganda” as a catch all term, omitting critical thinking, and then committing a form of ad hominem fallacy
(if I’m wrong, correct me)