The biggest risk of AGI isn't that it'll be hostile - it's that it'll be perfectly aligned with human values, and we'll finally have to face just how contradictory and broken those values really are.
I love capitalism, I wouldn’t have it any other way. However this is not about that. If we are going for ASI, why do the labs waste resources and not just pool to get to ASI faster? Why are all the models a variation of mixture of experts trained on similar data at similar gpu cluster sizes?
@AreteKleos@IterIntellectus What are you talking about? Who the fuck is a climate alarmist? I just enumerated one of the problems people talk as being global problems.
@signorelico@FredoCorleone16@IterIntellectus Ok, last post then I'm done responding to you dummies. This is not a regular product competition. They say (and I quite agree) that they are building THE FUCKING MACHINE GOD. What competition do you keep babbling about?
@FredoCorleone16@IterIntellectus Yes, I am a retard, but that is beside the point. My point is exactly that we are lacking innovation BECAUSE THEIR MODELS ARE ALL PRETTY MUCH THE SAME, my fellow retard.
@IterIntellectus pouring all their individual resources to all get similar results? It is so incredibly lame and so in contradiction with the AGI/ASI principle. Please, someone make it make sense.
I don't get. This whole AI industry is sooo lame. If we truly get ASI, we have the potential to solve humanity's most salient problems (climate change, all diseases, government, potentially post relativistic/quantum mechanics, etc.). Why the fuck do 7 labs all do the same thing ....
@elonmusk What does it have extra compared to the 1.5T V9 model except 33% more params? Is SpaceXAI going for more inovative architectures or just doubling down on scaling the current LLM paradigm?
@elonmusk@aaronburnett Will the same be needed for the Rubin GPUs? I'm assuming yes, but Grok 5 will be up by then which will be able to write the C/C++ stack itself much faster than 3 months.