Why does the modern "intellectual" not understand that before the United States, no superpower has EVER been as gracious and careful to protect human life as the US? All of those nations were killing their own infants anyway (not saying its good that they died at all), but they were sacrificing their children with the thought that their crops would produce a higher yield. The smug self-righteous authority has worn thin.
Tucker has been having guests on to hail the evils of capitalism. Tucker himself has been touting that the capitalist experiment is not working. Tucker criticizes Jews whilst praising islamist countries and Russia because they are "cleaner" guess what, thats like crapping your pants, and then putting on pants that have puke on them. The substitute he is suggesting is more government control and management of outcomes; yeah, that's bad. Candace is in bed with Act Blue, who has one out for TPUSA for daring to not include Candace and in Act Blue's case, commit the sin of going on their turf, college campuses. Nick Fuentes is a different story, he cannot help himself, he always has to troll, and then when he brings his actual thoughts and ideas onto Steven's show, he doesn't actually have any solutions, just wishful thinking. Ben is no saint, his religion turns off a lot of people (for good reason), but these people have duped so many into buying their snake oil, has grown far too high.
Have you actually listened to his show? He has massive disagreements with people like Steven Crowder (different dynamic with the whole term sheet thing but still), Matt Walsh (whom he employs), Dan Bongino, and the President himself, but you don't see him calling any of them antisemetic racists... how about instead of just saying things, you do your due diligence.
@paleochristcon I respect your work, Andrew, and your ability to debate, but to be fair, debate does not really change people's minds. Everyone has the ability to understand truth, it's just most people are too cowardly to believe it.
@teebaba23@BRICSinfo I would argue that Saudi Arabia being able to develop actual clean nuclear energy, without total reliance on Iran, is, yes, much better than what Iran does. This being, developing nuclear material way past the threshold of what is needed to have nuclear energy, for your nation.
Very complicated to explain over X, but in simple terms, you have to first know what moral frame work that an atheist or skeptic is working off of. If it is a western, what is "nice, polite and good-natured" moral frame work, you then need to ask the question as to why that person believes that. There is no simple argument, because unlike christianity, islam, hinduism, judaism or other religions, you need to understand where the person in front of you is coming from. Does this make any sense (I know I didn't answer the question).
@JoshuaBarzon How about we stop engagement baiting. I know by typing this I am giving you exactly what you want. If you really cared for Christians, then you wouldn't use a clickbait facade, warmed over with some Evangelical catch phrases.
@CageTheoryMMA@Home_of_Fight While I do agree with you generally, Kamaru was complaining to the ref multiple times (probably at least four) at a couple, at best, dubious fouls.