@AquaticManiac07 I heard that it's already released last night and there have been photographs today to prove that there are no great white in the tank anymore
@johann122004 A decent doc, probably one of the most accurate paleo documentaries of current decade; but if you’re looking for something novel, this probably isn’t the right show, as many of the info have already been covered by other doc (& the way it presents info is not really entertaining)
@SomniosusW It's been alive for at least 3 days, but probably won't survive a week. Keeping a juvenile great white shark in there (an underground fish tank for the cafe in Gampo, Gyeongju, South Korea) is very harmful for the shark; it already has a bruised nose after bumping the tank.
@TheRealTrampy Personal opinion: I found your Thomas in the first 7 episodes to be in character, 10~14 maybe a bit too rude for my liking, and 16~18 was hilarious (I think your addition of Toby made it much more watchable than 10~14 as well)
@astrapionte Not exactly; they said they'll reveal the official release date once they're confident enough about it, so I assume that it's in the final touches to be specific
@TMouseKingNeal He apologized, but very reluctantly, as he initially refused to change the wording until he was forced to do so. This fact makes me think a lot more whenever I rewatch that story.
@raftingzalmoxes For Prototaxites, I hope the show won't refer to it as a fungus but the study was pretty recent so my hopes aren't that high (even if that occurs though it would be a minor issue)
@Paleonyx_Art@SmashAssemble@PaleoWatcher To be specific, the fleshy comb crest is only known in a specimen from Wapiti Formation previously referred to E. regalis, but that specimen has since been suggested to be a separate taxon (tentatively E. sp. as of now); the Wapiti "Edmontosaurus" is depicted in WWD 2025 ep 5.
@SomniosusW A good korean paleo artist but does block people for no reason; like for instance, I never ever interacted with them yet last time I checked I got blocked
This is perhaps my last posts regarding the size estimations of Nanaimoteuthis haggarti, pretty much because there is nothing more to attempt to change their results until somebody come to make a more concrete argument of the results, for now I stick with a conservative size