@Axle58845673 Well that’s why I referred you to ‘provisional’ in above tweet to foster deterrence of cognitive bias
My style is to prefer to ask the Question, and for others to contribute to knowledge or fact formation. People often can’t cope with that it seems $AVZ
How times have changed among $AVZ #AVZ shareholders.
Here we have Jens lauding @sanegeist but now doing the opposite, Why?
Because many $AVZ shareholders are in a deep state of confusion and are not feeling in control.
$AVZ @asicmedia@ASX@DLA_Piper@AvzMinerals@emil_jens@speccapital@lars@dergeist@DEBOSS7788#DRCongo @AzzlerMcAzzface
AVZ shareholders ought to thank Jens Emil Soderlund for noting (very publicly) that Nigel Ferguson's brilliant plan was to blow a ton of money on lawyers and hope the DRC wouldn't call his bluff? Genius
So, how much of shareholder funds did he blow?
It seems he spent over $20 Million in 2023 alone. Here is the break down:
Legal/consulting fees $5.4 million
Me Kabeya Mbuyi $2.5 million
Marius Mihigo (US$6m) $9.2 million
Legal fees (HY -Dec) $5.7 million
TOTAL $22.8 million
From my discussions with $AVZ shareholder Shane Eastwood,
-AVZ didn’t claim SE had acted illegally-but collocated SE, Fat Tails with its summary view
-AVZ did not give its readers legal advice nor complete advice
-AVZ did not cite Law
-AVZ is misleading
https://t.co/VBMRslMAvL
excellent collection of handles for Shane!
Everyone go back to April 2022, and see which handles called it CORRECTLY
99% were in denial
Ferguson’s secrets kept you captive, he is the one to target for an ousting $AVZ
Koala worked it out in 10 minutes⏬
https://t.co/6F14asFQS3
@LudbrookTy@_smogdaddy@AvzMinerals @NFerguson2014 @ASX@asicmedia@KiengeKki $AVZ hid it likely because it’s a small sum they can safely say they can ignore
But yes, as a retail investor you’d want to know your companies wrap points
What else do you have?
@Nickopedia69@Rangoon871@mondyinvest Just disgusting $LLL
It’s easy to wager Chinese and Malians conspired to ease out the Australians
Same recipe for $AVZ ?
@lotiongang1@LudbrookTy @NFerguson2014 @AvzMinerals@KiengeKki Always good to be a doubting Thomas, but also doubt $AVZ who would seek to deny any wrongdoing at all costs for as long as it takes
@DominicFurfaro@_smogdaddy Beisha makes the Point Nigel has been vague on the North, that @we were tricked”
If accurate Nigel is in trouble and you guys are hiding it?
And Formal Question time at AGM denied as Beisha recalls is a red flag
https://t.co/JRDqbaLGXn
Here is a furphy by a likely company shill-
No one can say @AvzMinerals supplied because @Outcast_North is not AVZ, right?
The furphy is, $AVZ announced revocation of decree in JAN/FEB 2022
There was nothing announced about a decree revocation on ASX
https://t.co/LICYKyYsTh
@LudbrookTy@cominiereSA@JFMF@JFMK 11. Jan, Feb-2022: As AVZ never agreed to the north and south separation, the work in progress never got completed and registered formally.
MoP, @JFMK were both angry at AVZ.
AVZ announced that the Decree to issue ML/PE has been revoked with details.
10/n.
@Outcast_North@LudbrookTy@cominiereSA@JFMF@JFMK@icsid it's not enough.
Particulars need to be much more detailed
Why are you being a company shill? Do you realise you look like you are exploited as a proxy so $AVZ can dodge shareholders reliance on itself? This is a ASX Co legal tactic you may not understand
Carlos is SMART !!
Did you know there was a Mining decree awarded in 2021 to $AVZ
LMAO -- Why isn't AVZ spelling this out themselves?
That's right, this below has zero credibility from a legal perspective because it's not supplied $AVZ TO YOU
@LudbrookTy Hey @LudbrookTy
You already likely know the specific events that transpired between Feb-2021 and Mar-2022 from Peter H., other sources and they are:
1. Mar-2021: after 4 formal reports were filed by $AVZ, the Decree to issue ML was given by MoM.
1/n.
This is a crystal clear example of all that is wrong with $AVZ's compliance with continuous disclosure rules.
Anything materially impacting project progress needs to be disclosed to market, it's not simply a matter of legal merit argument- these are powerful people
@LudbrookTy@cominiereSA@JFMF 5. Jul, Aug-2021: For first time AVZ suspected foul-play & demanded proper reason for excluding the North attaching the Mining Code & JVA legal Clauses as reference to this demand.
@JFMK willingly ignored AVZ demand to buy more time for the hastily construed #Zijin deal.
4/n
@Outcast_North@LudbrookTy@cominiereSA@JFMF@JFMK@icsid it's not enough.
Particulars need to be much more detailed
Why are you being a company shill? Do you realise you look like you are exploited as a proxy so $AVZ can dodge shareholders reliance on itself? This is a ASX Co legal tactic you may not understand
Carlos is SMART !!