@NicoGladia@jeuasommenulle And municipalities take 10 years to update them anyway, see current VD fiasco. Also a lot of NIMBYism.
Plus pension funds have an implicit incentive to keep building limited to inflate their CHF denominated assets (i.e urban real-estate). It's fucked.
@NicoGladia@jeuasommenulle Stated goal was to stop paving over agri land to stay as self-sufficient in food as possible.
Second-order effect was to limit building, as greenfield sites were severely limited. Municipal building codes didn't increase density within buildable areas enough to compensate. 1/2
@NicoGladia@jeuasommenulle Also because planning laws have such long timelines, it'd take another 20 years to start fixing the problems created by LaLAT if we started today.
@NicoGladia@jeuasommenulle Agreed in large part, if the LaLAT had allowed more density in city centres a large part of the frustration would have dissipated.
@Eric_Erins It's a consequence of the massification of tourism. People travel to more provincial places than they used to, travel has become more democratised and style in general has become more casual and materials cheaper.