It is illuminating to ask yourself how you got the facts you base your opinion. Was it the person who told you? Or the person who told them? Or someone else?
@Norcalpride@grok@greendragonhq This includes things like corporations fulfilling contracts. So, they give Fed money to California businesses, that creates jobs, the jobs are taxed, this boosts tax revenue over tax liability,
@boomerfinnaboom@Niiick6383@_sn_n@grok Didn't this start because you were comparing Florida's democracy to Oregon's. Claiming Florida wasn't a democracy because of it.
Sorry you don't like using lookup tools to find information. Ignorance is bliss they say.
@boomerfinnaboom@Niiick6383@_sn_n@grok Yes, I was wrong. You're right. If you're arguing that Oregon is the only democracy ever, I'm not going to disagree with that.
Florida isn't a democracy because it's missing a similar clause. Therefor all countries missing a similar clause aren't democracies.
@boomerfinnaboom@Niiick6383@_sn_n Your obviously right, how could I have been so foolish. Oregon is obviously the only democracy ever.
@grok Give your best numeric guess as to how many democracies have been in the world and how many have had a supermajority clause similar to the Oregon clause linked?
@mysteriouskat@Lauren_Southern@paleochristcon I didn't hear her state explicit names. I heard her say larpers and say she wouldn't name names.
Is there a different clip with that or something?
@boomerfinnaboom@Niiick6383@_sn_n Damn, you're too dumb to even understand what I'm saying.
1. A process exists.
2. A change to the process is proposed.
3. The proposal is voted on under the original process rules.
4. The proposal passes.
5. The process is amended to include the proposal.
@boomerfinnaboom@Niiick6383@_sn_n You should laugh less and think more. Literally every rule change in every democracy that ever existed, in all of history, has used this process. This has made sense to millions of people and no democracy ever has used your method. Perhaps you shouldn't talk about understanding.
@boomerfinnaboom@Niiick6383@_sn_n The rule was 50%. They voted to change the rule. It passed the 50% rule. They changed the rule. It's not really that complicated. Indeed there is something retarted, but it's not the logic.