OpioraryapROAR

Neo-Gastonist

[OpioraryapROAR @OpioraryapROARR]

The trinity is perfectly coherent and logical. A portion being mysterious doesn't negate the truth of the whole. That would be a composition fallacy.

For example, a non-exhaustive analogy could be H2O, where even though it can be a liquid, solid, and gas at the same time, it's still H2O.🤦‍♂️

[OpioraryapROAR @OpioraryapROARR]

@God_Questioner Yeah, that's like someone saying they only believe there's 1 answer to 2+2 and you say, "but i reject all the same answers as you, I just reject one more."😂😂😂🤡

[OpioraryapROAR @OpioraryapROARR]

@DeeWaynee94 Aren't you an empiracist?😂😂😂

[OpioraryapROAR @OpioraryapROARR]

@SpeedWatkins Scripture is held as knowledge within the only possibly correct worldview? What does your high-school class have? Sense-data?😂😂😂

[OpioraryapROAR @OpioraryapROARR]

@IrisCreamCoffee @MartinusLogicus @ant_rants Why shouldn't we make it other people's problems or try to convert others? Because of your preferences?

[OpioraryapROAR @OpioraryapROARR]

@TheExBeliever Incoherebt. God is the necessary precondition for transcendentals.

[OpioraryapROAR @OpioraryapROARR]

@darwintojesus All they have is arbitrary "muh preference."

[OpioraryapROAR @OpioraryapROARR]

Dude, all of that is what's in question.

Perception of what and by what?

Reason according to what standard?

Memory of what and by what?

Logically consistent according to what standard?

Explained according to what standard?

You've just given me a bunch of stuff you think exists from sense-data. But those very things are preconditions for sense-data.

[OpioraryapROAR @OpioraryapROARR]

@AtheistPhoenix You have no objective meaning to justify "critical," nor any way to demonstrate "thinking."

Your worldview is literally just that random and flux chemical processes determine you to perform certain actions randomly.😂😂😂

[OpioraryapROAR @OpioraryapROARR]

@zeitgeisterman @TheExBeliever No, that's not this tu quoque. The Tu quoque here is "i don't need to justify my epistemology because you can't justify yours.."

I literally asked you what your epistemic foundation was and you said "the same sense-data you utilize."

[OpioraryapROAR @OpioraryapROARR]

@bloodboiler9001 @Kamp4u2 @DeeWaynee94 Literally just an appeal to incredulity...😂😂😂

[OpioraryapROAR @OpioraryapROARR]

@zeitgeisterman @TheExBeliever Great, so now we're getting into a "tu-quoque," which is a logical fallacy...

Whether or not my worldview is correct has no relation to if yours is correct. So if you want to concede that your worldview lacks epistemology, we can get into mine.

[OpioraryapROAR @OpioraryapROARR]

@ErichKays @DeeWaynee94 And? Yes, "atheistic" is an adjective that describes a particular worldview.

[OpioraryapROAR @OpioraryapROARR]

Bro, you and I don't have the same worldview. My epistemic foundation isn't "sense-data." I have a revelatory epistemic model that can justify how sense-data is generally reliable and uniform.

If your epistemology is "all knowledge is gained through sense-data," then now that axiom needs justification. Because, and correct me if I'm wrong, that proposition is a knowledge claim not found in sense-data.

[OpioraryapROAR @OpioraryapROARR]

Can an atheistic worldview contain "God/s?"

No, it can't, meaning it's a massive qualifier that now foundationally changes how you justify all of immaterial reality, metaphysics, ethics and epistemology.😂🤦‍♂️

It's like answering the question "how do you feel" by saying "I don't have feelings." Well, now there's a bunch of other questions that need to be answered...

[OpioraryapROAR @OpioraryapROARR]

Dude, you're literally mentally stunted, and I'm sorry for you. There is no contradiction between those posts. An "Atheistic worldview" is an adjective describing a noun. Nowhere does that infer that "atheistic" itself is a worldview...😂😂😂

My hell, you use light mode too? Wow, just failing to fire in every cylinder, huh?

[OpioraryapROAR @OpioraryapROARR]

@kepilar77 Once again, no reading comprehension? It's almost like an adjective isn't a noun.😂😂😂😂

[OpioraryapROAR @OpioraryapROARR]

@samketontherise @DeeWaynee94 You missed multiple instances of capitalization, utilized a period in place of a comma and missed a period. Then you cried...
Throwing stones from a glass house isn't beneath you, but it sure is pathetic.

[OpioraryapROAR @OpioraryapROARR]

@G_Mid18 @kepilar77 No, I was correct. Because "atheism" as a qualifier does attempt to solve the justification of a worldview by specifically qualifying "without god/s."

[OpioraryapROAR @OpioraryapROARR]

What's the methodology you utilized to found that knowledge claim? Did you utilize sense-data to read certain scholars? Were you present as an eye witness at the time? Are you just inferring based on vibes?

The flood is held as knowledge within the only possibly correct worldview...