CipherShrimp

🏗️ Build or Die❌

If you don't have a goal in life, you will work for someone who does.
Trust nobody. Trust nothing.
Verify everything.
Quantum FUD gets boiled

[CipherShrimp @Ordinal_Bitcoin]

@UTXO_Punk @0xShar3 we are all at risk fuck you bro stop laughing

[Blockstream_intern @blockstream_int]

“Make sure your fellow Bitcoiners are OK.”

Translation: “I spent years selling and promoting the Coldcard + Liana setup. Now that Coldcard has blown up, I only talk about Liana and politely ask everyone not to criticize NVK too much.”

You have to respect the business pivot.

[laz1m0v @laz1m0v]

It seems the whole Bitcoin Web3 space shares the exact same birth defects.

@xverse, your production core just failed 12 consecutive integration tests in our lab. The same disastrous entropy practices, the same blind trust models.

I don't burn empires, I build them. I'm not dropping the technical payloads publicly because the ecosystem needs fixing, not crashing. Read your DM. It's time to play together in the sandbox. Chaos is healing. (¬‿¬)
@YukanL @xverse @Xverse_Support

[CipherShrimp @Ordinal_Bitcoin]

@LilithDatura Seed's at risk too 😁

[UTXO Punk @UTXO_Punk]

Bitcoin Core 31 now supports transaction clusters of up to 64 transactions.

So I tested the limit directly on Bitcoin mainnet.

Funding UTXO
↓
TX01
↓
TX02
↓
…
↓
TX64

Full audit results:

64/64 TXIDs independently recomputed and verified.
64/64 valid ECDSA signatures.
Every transaction spends vout 0 of the previous transaction.
No broken links.
No incorrect parents.
No internal double-spends.

ancestorcount: 64
getmempoolcluster txcount: 64

All 64 transactions were simultaneously present inside a single local mempool cluster.
The full cluster measured exactly:

27,994 WU
4,070 sats in total fees
0.58155 sat/vB aggregate feerate

The chain was then progressively confirmed across four blocks:

10:09:33 PM — TX01
≈ 5m 33s after the observation

10:25:10 PM — TX02–TX08
≈ 21m 10s

10:39:34 PM — TX09
≈ 35m 34s

11:00:46 PM — TX10–TX64
≈ 56m 46s

The final 55 transactions were mined consecutively, in parent-before-child order.

Time from the first confirmation to the final confirmation: 51m 13s.

A concrete demonstration of the difference between:

• the on-chain transaction graph
• a node’s local mempool cluster
• transaction propagation across different infrastructures
• transaction selection by miners

There is still a massive amount of unexplored experimental surface on Bitcoin L1.

[CipherShrimp @Ordinal_Bitcoin]

@0xShar3 @LeonidasNFT 🤣 hilarous

[💻0xShar3✨ @0xShar3]

Watching @LeonidasNFT suddenly talk about covenants, entropy, and technical education, then position himself as Bitcoin’s savior, is pretty spectacular.

For years, you denounced the sectarianism of Knots while reproducing the exact same behavior inside the metaprotocol market:

Runes as the one true protocol. BRC-20 as the enemy to destroy. Communities forced to pick a side.

Sectarianism does not bother you. It only bothers you when you are not the one controlling the church.

Runes had a historic opening. BRC-20 had already proven the demand while leaving an enormous vacuum behind. You could have built a much more ambitious vision: UTXO-native assets, trust-minimized markets, applications anchored to Bitcoin, PSBTs, DLCs, Taproot Assets, and eventually covenants.

Even @rodarmor acknowledged that Runes could become a serious competitor to Taproot Assets and RGB. But you only amplified the first half of the pitch:

“Built for degens and memecoins.”

Instead of raising the narrative, you imported the memecoin-supercycle playbook copy paste of @MustStopMurad and solana reasoning :

A ticker, a cult, an army, and a permanent war against every neighboring protocol.

Plenty of noise. Plenty of tribal marketing. Plenty of promises.

Very little vision beyond the next cycle.

And now, with no original idea left, you are copying the playbook of your sworn enemy, @LukeDashjr :

An alternative client, a moral crusade, and calls to purge people from Bitcoin’s “social layer” three years late, with the politics reversed.

You are not fighting the disorder. You are simply asking to become its administrator.

I am agnostic when it comes to Bitcoin metaprotocols. I like Runes, and I like BRC-20 and I’ll support the metaprotocols real innovation that come next too.

Because innovation does not stop wherever you decide it should.

The infrastructure has evolved. The technology has moved forward.

And all of you left behind a massive void.

That is exactly the point.

Bitcoin does not need another priesthood especially not a memecoin priesthood that suddenly discovers covenants when it is time to reposition its market.

Build. Educate. Compete.

But spare us the savior cosplay.

[💻0xShar3✨ @0xShar3]

@LeonidasNFT "DOG mode" is just the latest rebrand of your attention-farming business model.

[💻0xShar3✨ @0xShar3]

Bitcoin works. Now secure everything around it.

[laz1m0v @laz1m0v]

Everyone is suddenly an L1 security expert today. Cute. In March, while you were LARPing about theoretical vaults, we deployed them. The Covenant IS the Consensus. We tried to warn you.

[laz1m0v @laz1m0v]

August 2026: The timeline discovers vaults.
March 2026: PRECOP ships trustless L1 covenants on Mainnet.
Narrative follows execution. You’re just late
Builders > Talkers.

[CipherShrimp @Ordinal_Bitcoin]

@0xShar3 @AnalysisFeral Shaaame

[CipherShrimp @Ordinal_Bitcoin]

@laz1m0v

[CipherShrimp @Ordinal_Bitcoin]

@0xShar3

[CipherShrimp @Ordinal_Bitcoin]

The air gap worked.
The entropy didn’t.

[CipherShrimp @Ordinal_Bitcoin]

and ??

[Leonidas 🧡 $DOG @LeonidasNFT]

Michael Saylor just followed @rodarmor the founder of the Ordinals and Runes Protocols

Wen $DOG @saylor?

[CipherShrimp @Ordinal_Bitcoin]

@0xShar3 Selective double standards

[💻0xShar3✨ @0xShar3]

Hi @adam3us happy cypherpunk summer ☀️

But the picture is almost funny.

While the CEO celebrates cypherpunk summer,
his own Simplicity Ecosystem Engineer @Arvolear :

"11 years. 100% uptime. Happy birthday!"

Same company.
Same time
Two rooms.
Two ambiances.
Two timelines

The infrastructure keeps moving.
The narrative… less so.

[CipherShrimp @Ordinal_Bitcoin]

@laz1m0v @lorenzonical oops

[CipherShrimp @Ordinal_Bitcoin]

oops

[laz1m0v @laz1m0v]

I just mapped out the 7 vulnerabilities of the Ordinals apocalypse. 🐇

I can certify the base entropy isn't backdoored, but the local trust model (Vault, plaintext RAM, Blind Signing) is a disaster. This is exactly what happens when Web3 engineers use a Web2 mindset to rush a product for the Ordinals hype. You aren't cryptographers.

But I’m here to build, not destroy. Building an empire on patched libraries guarantees users will get silently siphoned, and we need to prevent that. @unisat_wallet, I'm keeping the technical payload private so we can collaborate. Let's join forces, fix this house of cards, and secure the ecosystem properly.