Nacho - bringing a new meaning to super cat.
Did you know Kat Pool (in beta) is ranked 23 out of all Kaspa mining pools.
https://t.co/tmZqfj3BFQ
Kaspa miners come and get Nacho returned alongside of Kaspa (taken from the pool fee and given back to each miner)
🚨 UPDATE: DAGKNIGHT JUST MOVED FORWARD AGAIN.
Yesterday: Testnet 13 was being prepared.
Now: the infrastructure has been MERGED into the DAGKnight development branch. ⚡
That distinction matters.
Proposal → Code → Merge → Testing → Public Testnet → Mainnet
We're watching DAGKnight being built in real time.
$KAS #Kaspa #DAGKnight
We are expecting good attendance by leaders and experts from all over the world on desert based clean energy systems, markets and related trusted information, a.o. distributed BlockDAG technology @ZETAlliance@KaspaKii@IRENA@IEA
Dii Desert Energy is working together with a.o. @ZETAlliance and @KaspaKii giving shape to clean energy systems, clean energy markets and the required trusted information layers ensuring integrity from ‘source to sink’! @pvson@SolarUAE@SebW5228@parker2017
@pumpolinsky@travladd Likely wrapped around some NDA's.
I'd lean towards a market maker building up liquidity ahead of the pack, they can then make a killing with industrial adoption kicking in by being the source for supplying industrial users kaspa otc
@ibuypow@Ramses_ICP It is absolutely groundbreaking and the developers are scratching the surface. In 5-10+ years it will blow our minds compared to the current capabilities of it
Institutional advocacy is not conducted on X.
It is conducted directly with principals, CTOs, risk committees, legal counsel and compliance officers.
Kaspa’s native programmable layer is only a few weeks old. Security auditors are still studying covenants and the blockDAG architecture. That learning curve alone takes time.
Beyond the technology itself sit far heavier requirements that social-media commentary routinely ignores:
• Institutional custody frameworks demand proven controls, independent audits, insurance wrappers, and operational maturity before any serious capital is placed on a new layer.
• Procurement and public/private tendering processes follow multi-stage RFPs, due-diligence cycles, vendor risk assessments and board-level approvals that routinely run 12–24 months.
• Each industry carries its own mandatory standards - financial messaging (ISO 20022), energy settlement, supply-chain provenance, sanctions screening, data-residency rules and sector-specific regulatory sandboxes. Meeting those standards is not optional and cannot be accelerated by tweets.
Sandbox testing, formal verification, regulatory engagement and independent security review all operate on institutional timelines, not crypto-Twitter timelines. Asking major institutions to move valuable assets onto a newly programmable layer without that groundwork is not “ambition” - it is ignorance of how these organisations actually work.
Those of us doing the substantive work understand the sequence and the constraints. Those who do not should stop confusing volume of posts with progress. Patience is part of getting it right.
Quantum computers will eventually be able to break the cryptography that protects blockchains today. The fix is new "post-quantum" signatures, but they are big and slow to work with.
We just showed they can be checked on Kaspa in seconds. Here is how.
In plain terms: we take the three new quantum-safe signature standards (NIST) and prove them correct inside a zero-knowledge virtual machine, so the network can trust the result without redoing all the work.
The numbers below are the time it takes to produce that proof.
All three NIST schemes, proved on an RTX 4090 (means of 5 runs):
Falcon-512: 1.91s
ML-DSA-44: 5.35s
SLH-DSA-128s: 16.3s
SLH-DSA is the hard one (hash-based). It was taking 30+ minutes. RISC Zero's SHA-256 precompile is what brings it down to 16s.
The important part: we did not run these on our own hardware. @0xfourier (GhostProver / NTH MOMENT) benchmarked it independently and the proof artifacts are published. Don't trust the graphic, check the artifacts.
https://t.co/sEmgWuDI9H
https://t.co/BPrOK5psRs
Thanks to @0xfourier and to the crypto interns who worked on this. PQ + ZK, built in the open. #Kaspa $KAS
@BM_DystopiaNow@Telegraph What the USA being godforsaken? In the UK we have free speech but we also have freedom from harm which includes disgusting speech that is solely for hate.
In America you are free to be hateful to each other then usually get shot that isn't being free
Very cool, entertaining and with high production values: if I were @Nigel_Farage, I’d consider dipping into that £5 million to try to get out a video that can compare to it.
@chillenall87270@Bombiecrypto The tps from energy transactions, then add in global financial transactions (micro payments etc). The tps count will be beyond anything else seen in crypto but sustainable every day of the year
@techyandfoodie@DesheShai Not a problem at all, happy to have helped out.
It's mostly all theory until things become reality, but we have a lot of security because of what makes kaspa different from everything else in the crypto space
@Kaspacryptoking Institutional adoption behind, when warpcore goes live we have 2 roads, slow or fast. If fast then the price will absolutely explode because of the locked liquidity for stable energy trades
@techyandfoodie@DesheShai But another aspect is the dag, so if a malicious actor did buy the hardware to do the attack (around $85 million) the dag would still accept legitimate blocks too, it isn't ground down in the same way a lineal chain would be