@muheediva01 This is going to blow your mind but “contact for pricing” people understand this because it’s obvious and they’re open to the sell before dialing.
You were filtered as intended.
I don't believe we've been teaching women how to treat men well for more than a few generations now. It seems to me that this entire time, men were still largely being taught how to treat women well. And for the most part, boys learned their role, respected it and respected women. Women haven't been taught the same of their roles or how to respect men. I know I wasn't and I've had to learn this myself as an adult. It's no wonder some men have finally snapped.
@Sthormyy@Maxochism I wouldn’t enable. As a short king, I learned to roll with those punches, became hilarious. Never had a single issue dating. Tons of women don’t care if you’re short, they care if you have an insecure meltdown over it.
Men. When it comes to confronting women supporting Lindsay Clancy, say nothing. Just repost this incredible video that says everything we're saying... but it's an exceptional woman saying it.
As I explained in a my previous post, this is the critical moment for women.
I don't want to sound hyperbolic but this is a huge event.
If she's allowed to get away with this, it will unleash women's pathologies in a nightmarish way.
Women, not most but far too many, will murder their children and hide behind the illusion of "she wouldn't have done that unless she was TRULY suffering." That's the claim these women are making.
The only way to prevent this is for Lindsay Clancy to get an unambiguous condemnation, ideally the death penalty.
It's not bloodlust. It's that she can't be allowed to be a living martyr to the claim that murdering three children can be excused.
I don't blackpill but if this happens, men will not trust women at all and instead will fully commit to just using them as disposable sex objects. That will end our civilization.
It's dark.
@memeticsisyphus Female empowerment and careerism has always been marketed that way. à la carte (but with all the nasty stuff removed from the menu).
When all jobs which function as a means are removed from the selection pool, why would a woman ever view a job as a means?
@memeticsisyphus I personally was never the biggest fan of alcohol. It’s good when it’s good. After my 20s, I settled on being the “if I’m invited out I’m drinking, if I’m at home, I’m not”. Was able to maintain the social circle, no one felt judged.
Every woman in the West has been influenced by feminism. But not just the women. So has every single man. This does not mean everyone is a feminist, but the effects of feminism have influenced all of us.
The ideas of feminism, along with its parent, Marxism, and the general ideas of the anti-West left wing intellectuals, have become the de facto primary culture in our nations. We have been officially culturally captured.
Most men and women in the West currently hold one or more feminist ideas. It is a widespread poison that has infected almost everyone to some degree. They may not hold the more pernicious and poisonous feminist ideas. They may instead only hold the ones that lead later to the more dangerous ideas.
Feminism is a left-wing idea, the core of which has been heartily embraced and normalized by the right.
For the last ten days or so, the conversation on X has been about the worst of feminism and the desire to excuse the murder of children, rooted in feminist ideas, especially the idea that women’s welfare must come before every other consideration.
Now, some people will say that only represents a tiny minority of women. Well, let us look at the statistics. Twenty-five percent of American women have killed at least one of their children through abortion. Sixty-four percent of women support abortion.
It is not a small minority. It is a majority of women. And that number is likely to keep growing unless there is major social backlash against the horror of child sacrifice.
Of course, this is not to say that there are not good women out there. There are wonderful women who reject the worst excesses of feminism. But I have found that even most anti-feminist women still have at least one feminist belief.
And I do not think it is because of maliciousness. I think it is because women naturally conform to the social narrative. And the social narrative today is feminism.
It takes a tremendous amount of resistance to completely purge yourself of those ideas. Most women simply do not have the disagreeableness necessary to say no to the dominant societal trend.
Some people will say, “But Noah, you are feeding the gender war.”
That is absolutely not true. The gender war has existed throughout history. There has always been this kind of underlying conflict, mostly between single men and women. We have tried various methods of harmonizing it. None have worked so well as marriage, especially once you have children.
If you allow it to affect you, to mature you, and to grow up in your heart, you will come to realize that cooperation with your spouse, under the leadership of the husband, for the purpose of raising children into adults, is the only way to end the gender war. It aligns men and women better than any other system.
My work, my mission, with men and women is to call them to take agency and responsibility for themselves. To become capable of self-rule or to admit their limitations and submit to righteous rule. This will, of course, rankle both the feminists on the left and the right.
One of the primary feminist tropes is that women have no agency. They are merely the victims of circumstance, society, their own biology, and the patriarchy. This idea, where women are not actors but the acted upon, is even popular on the right.
Again, feminism has infected all political ideologies. It is the most destructive tool wrought by that branch of leftism from which it spawned.
I do believe that women’s agency is different from men’s, and I have written about that extensively in the past. But if we truly believe that women have no agency, then we would treat them like animals in order to prevent them from self-destruction. They would become property and nothing more.
But if women have agency, then we need to hold them accountable to the degree to which their individual agency enables that. And we need to kill the societal idea that women as a group can never be responsible for anything that happens in their lives, that they are always victims of circumstance, or that female biology is an excuse for evil.
More importantly, we need to hack at the root of the problem, which is the massive, highly successful propaganda effort that tells women that they are victims and have no agency.
As a civilization, the West has made tremendous progress in reducing male forms of violence. In fact, we have perhaps gone too far, neutering our men.
We now need to address the problem of female violence, especially against children and through the manipulation of the court system, the authorities, and institutions of the West.
This is a problem we will tackle because it will become such a massive problem that a failure to address it will lead to the complete destruction of the West. And we will not allow that to happen.
The question remains: how do we solve this problem?
I think the policy-level changes that need to be made are for a different discussion. But at the root of all of it, we must begin to hold women accountable for their actions, hold them to the highest standard, and yes, at first that standard may well be beyond what many women can live up to.
And when you do not meet a standard, there are consequences. Those consequences are designed either to restore reciprocity or to restore the individual’s capacity to live up to the standard.
That is really what we need: a civilization-wide reawakening to the need for standards and for the social pressure to hold women to those standards.
So who can do that?
The only ones who can hold women to a high standard are men who hold themselves to a high standard and are, in turn, held to a high standard by their fellow men.
And yes, that means the patriarchy will return.
option 3 also creates a future where no women exist.
They are a liability in the work force, safety is a key issue, and wildly emotional, for better and for worse. They come with a monthly problem that makes many not want to do anything for a week- some women being worse than others. women also have their own medical issues unique to women. for what purpose would anyone have for a woman in this world? weaker, emotional, too high potential for crazy, why risk even making one?
Depression and "mental issues" are a massive problem in women in first world nations. Instead of falling for propaganda that rejects their biological desires, I wish they'd go back to focusing on family.
It would be fine if they were just being stupid on their own- you know? I don't care about someone else's loneliness and misery.
But they vote. And women are very problematic in voting patterns. They are easily manipulated too and lesser men love to hide behind that.
For the good of the world, I hope women are removed from positions of power and lose the ability to vote. They have proven they are unable to govern themselves accordingly. They routinely vote for the rapist to go be brought in to a country and be made free so it may rape more women and children- but instead of removing the rapist, the woman will sit there and bitch about "men" in general, ignore demographic data and what they voted for, and then come up with products that damage the rapist while the rape is happening instead of...you know, removing the rapist from the server.
It is all tiring. So please, for the good of our future daughters, lets not create number 3, because otherwise they wont like the efficiency discussions that come.