@HydroNovaaa@Master_Cr4ne Subjective opinion either way. Does not change the rest of my point anyways.
But I do commend you, this is the first time you followed the context from your previous comment on your next one.
Very nice!
@bulbalt@HydroNovaaa@Master_Cr4ne It was bad sales wise, because they did an awful job of marketing the release and because they put too much emphasis of the marketing on the gamepad.
@Joshua60991948@HydroNovaaa@Master_Cr4ne You have a console with next to no exclusives and the games coming and currently there are not great.
DK Bananza had decent reception
Pokopia had good reception
MK World had mixed (leaning more to bad)
Metroid 4 (not even exclusive and bad)
Legends ZA (not exclusive and bad)
@suoypmain@Master_Cr4ne I wonder why people think when I say they were like that 10 years ago, that I only mean exactly 10 years ago and not also all the years before as well.
I do glaze the DS and 3DS, but the N64 etc. also had a better „for fun“ and „for players“ philosophy than Nintendo now.
@HydroNovaaa@Master_Cr4ne The fact that they all were so good that they were ported, even though it‘s from the most recent console before, shows how good that era of games actually was.
And again, you‘re changing your argument. You haven‘t been consistent in your line of argumentation once.
Also: Smash 4
@HydroNovaaa@Master_Cr4ne Nobody argued about the price of games either.
Nor does your point here have something to do with your previous point.
Nor was my point about specifically just the Wii U era, but the entire Era before when Reggie and Iwata were still around at Nintendo and the GAMES from then.
@HydroNovaaa@Master_Cr4ne How does this have anything to do with Nintendo games?
We are talking about the time when the GAMES were made with a „fun first“ philosophy. Not about when YT and Nintendo decided to f over creators.
You‘re getting into a completely different argument than what the topic was.
@ChikinTX@Master_Cr4ne I feel like you don‘t know what a „larp“ is first of all.
Secondly, the WiiU era was better than the switch era overall (And 1000 times better than the current switch 2 era), but I am regretting to all the years before the switch as a better time, when the former ceo was alive.
@OG_Thuglisious@PostLeftWatch You know, this reminds me of that black teacher that was crying about the 17 year old kids in his class not being able to read.
You only had to read further than just 20 words.
If you want to rage bait, at least get a checkmark and make some money.
@piquedarm@ChumBucketDrama *Check following*
*Follows Hasan Piker, the guy saying there are „baby settlers“ and that those are „valid military targets“*
Well now, not only are you a hypocrite, but you also seem to like people who abuse their dog and celebrate the death of others.
Who would have guessed?
@Jakub_Oplistil@JacoisS@GamingAndPandas Well, yes it is the lesser of two evils. But I think you try to put some causality here as if it has to equal out.
I‘ll try it this way.
Kill: very bad
Survive: very good
Now in your world this goes to 0
But where it goes is: very good/bad. Both remains true, it does not go away
@Jakub_Oplistil@JacoisS@GamingAndPandas Yeah and in this part I just disagreed because of how per law, as long as it‘s alive, it would be a crime not to help (in my country) and as soon as you said this was on a theoretical basis and not within the confines of laws set by the government, this conversation was over.
@Jakub_Oplistil@JacoisS@GamingAndPandas But it is. What right do you have to decide wether that action is justifiable purely because of the circumstance?
A bad action remains a bad action, even if I would do the exact same in that situation to the best for myself. For me that‘s good. Morally it ain‘t.
@Bucky_cm Hmmm…
I think (considering the sheer map size already) more caves may be the way to go. Caves can, without interfering with the current massive too much, add to the area for exploring and building and you can have a variety of biomes within them anyway.
@Jakub_Oplistil@JacoisS@GamingAndPandas If it were my own child I‘d handle it in my best interest (so whatever I can do for my kid) and be immoral if I have to.
I do think the argument goes far away from the original point here though. I simply mean that aborting a fetus is like not helping a dying, savable, person.