@PrajwalTomar_ The gap between having an idea and turning it into a working product is shrinking incredibly fast. A single screen recording becoming a polished, interactive website in 30 minutes is absolutely wild. We’re just getting started. 🔥
@pankajkumar_dev This is exactly the kind of real-world feedback we need. The idea of using a stronger model for architecture and planning, then switching to a cheaper one for implementation, makes a lot of sense. Speed seems to be the biggest trade-off here.
I’ve officially hit 100% of my 5-hour session limit, and my weekly usage is already at 35%.
The funniest part? It’s only 6 PM. My limits reset just 13 hours ago. 💀
At this rate, I’ll burn through my entire weekly allowance before the weekend is even over.
I’m not coding anymore. I’m speedrunning my subscription limits.
My weekly Claude Code limit just reset, and I’ve already burned through 17% in a single 5-hour session.
At this rate, I’ll run out of my entire weekly allowance in less than 30 hours.
I don’t think I’m using AI anymore. I think AI is using me. 💀
@Claudeupdates11 Antigravity has its own usage quotas, separate from your Claude subscription. Claude and GPT models share a separate usage pool within Antigravity, while Gemini has its own independent limits.
My predictions for tomorrow:
•Astra 6.1 wins at least one benchmark on stage
•The timeline calls it mid within 2 hours
•Everyone compares it to Sonnet 5.5, not Opus
Screenshot this 📸
@bindureddy Interesting, early posts on the landing page and 3D tests looked the opposite. Maybe it depends a lot on the task? Curious what the LiveBench breakdown shows
🚨 Nvidia just announced a record $150B share buyback, the largest ever, beating Apple's $110B from 2024.
The twist: the stock is trading near its lowest valuation in over a decade.
Nvidia clearly thinks it's undervalued 👀