π New users: $10 free**
π₯ Refer a friend: **$6
πΈ Top up $1 β get $10 free ($11)
πΈ Top up $10 β get $100 free ($110)
β‘ DeepSeek open model: $1 β 30M tokens
π₯ ~$3/month = token freedom
π Sign up: [https://t.co/LcwzZOfcM3]
The rumored Fable 5.5 needs a massive leap or a price cut.
Per 1M input/output tokens:
Opus 5.5: $4/$20
Fable 5.1: $10/$50
What upgrade would justify burning your weekly limit?
Stop letting ONE AI usage bar decide when you can code.
Opus 5.5 β architecture + deep bugs
Gemini 4 Argon β multi agent set up
Codex (GPT-6.1 Sol) β verification
Spread the workload. Keep a fallback when one hits its cap.
Whatβs your stack?
I'm 4+ days into my weekly cycle on Ultra and still have 81% of my weekly limit
Meanwhile on the $20 Pro tier, the Argon cap is brutal:
- A single ~190k-context task eats 20%β23% of the entire weekly limit
- Even a short prompt burns ~9%β10% of the 5-hr bar
- Devs are hitting 0% lockout in 4 to 7 tasks
On Ultra, the Argon limit feels generous.
On $20 Pro, it's basically a 5-prompt demo.
Gemini 4 Argon combined three open-source datasets to build an interactive 3D visualization of human anatomy.
Toggle different layers in motion, isolate muscles, or zoom inside a beating heart.
Opus 5.5 on Max all day can torch your weekly limit.
Try this in Claude Code:
Max/xhigh β map dependencies + plan
High/Medium β implement
Switch with /effort in the SAME chat.
Whatβs your combo?
What's leaked on Claude Fable 5.5 so far:
- Spotted in Azure East US 2 (claude-fable-5-5)
- 1M context / 128K max output
- $10/$50 tier (2.5x Opus 5.5's price)
- 2nd partner checkpoint active