@MarioNawfal Who are you exactly?!
Seems that you are an agent for both Elon Musk & the government you live under!
Mind your own business and leave Europe deal with its own issues!
@FT Erik Prince, the barbaric terrorist, mercenary mafia leader, enemy of humanity, and ally of governments that support sabotage and torture everywhere, does not deserve a better place to live than solitary confinement for the rest of his life.
WARNING: GRAPHIC CONTENT
Israeli authorities and security forces deliberately targeted Palestinian children, resulting in genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes in Gaza, and war crimes in the occupied West Bank, an independent UN inquiry says https://t.co/C2z0FoxakE
@MarioNawfal as expected from you;your guest is an Islam & Palestinian s hater, a wild Zionist who supported the genocide in Gaza.
He even says that there is no such thing as a Palestinian people!
https://t.co/GtwBtGN3H1
ساعر:
لن تنسحب إسرائيل من المناطق الأمنية في لبنان وسوريا وغزة. سيواصل الجيش الإسرائيلي الدفاع عن حدودنا ومواطنينا من داخل جبال الشيخ، والجبال اللبنانية، ومناطق بلادنا في السامرة، ومعظم أراضي غزة - ضد تهديدات القوى والمنظمات الجهادية، كدرس أساسي من أحداث 7 أكتوبر.
נשיא ארה"ב מוביל בימים אלה להסכם עם איראן מתוך ראיית האינטרסים האמריקאים, ובהם גם האינטרס המשותף עם ישראל - למנוע מאיראן נשק גרעיני - ואנו מצפים שיעמוד על העיקרון הזה ועקרונות נוספים בתחום הטילים ושלוחי הטרור.
ביחד הנחתנו על איראן מכות קשות שהסיגו את יכולותיה שנים רבות לאחור.
ישראל חייבת לוודא שגם בעתיד תהיה לנו את היכולת לפעול באופן עצמאי כדי למנוע מאיראן נשק גרעיני, ורה"מ בנימין נתניהו ואני הנחינו את צה"ל להיערך בהתאם.
ישראל לא תיסוג מאזורי הביטחון בלבנון, בסוריה ובעזה. צה"ל ימשיך להגן על גבולותינו ואזרחינו מתוך כתר החרמון, הרי הלבנון, חבלי ארצנו בשומרון ורוב שטחה של עזה - מול איומי כוחות וארגונים ג'יהאדיסטים, כלקח מרכזי מאירועי ה-7 באוקטובר.
צה"ל לא ייסוג ממחנות הטרור בצפון השומרון, המפונים מתושבים, ובמידת הצורך יורחב המהלך למחנות טרור נוספים.
תפיסת הביטחון שלנו חדה וברורה: פועלים מול איומים קרובים ורחוקים ושואפים להכרעות ולא לפשרות וויתורים.
הרבה מונח על כפות המאזניים בתקופה זו ואנחנו נחושים להמשיך ולהוביל מדיניות ביטחונית תקיפה שתמנע פגיעה בהישגינו הביטחוניים ולא תסכן את יכולתנו להיאבק מול ציר הרשע השיעי בהובלת איראן וציר הרשע הסוני בהובלת האחים המוסלמים.
ברצוני להביע הערכה רבה לפיקוד הצה"לי על ההישגים הגדולים ולחיילינו הגיבורים, בסדיר, בקבע ובמילואים, על מלחמת הגבורה למען ביטחון ישראל - ולתושבי הצפון על עמידת הגבורה שנותנת לצה"ל את הכוח להמשיך ולהגן על ביטחונם.
אני שולח חיבוק גדול למשפחות השכולות שאיבדו את היקר מכל ומאחל החלמה לכל הפצועים, בגוף ובנפש, שמסרו עצמם למען ההגנה על חיי היהודים וביטחון מדינת ישראל.
الذكاء الاصطناعي أحدث بالفعل تغيرا جذريًا في أسواق سندات الشركات،التي تعتبر عادة أقل جاذبية،بقيادة Amazon وAlphabet وMeta،والتي ضاعفت مستويات ديونها القائمة في الأشهر القليلة الماضية إلى حوالي 300 مليار $وهذا يعزز ما وصفته منظمة التعاون الاقتصادي بـ "تحويل ديون الشركات إلى أسهم".
@docshayji يا دكتور: لا تكترث بالجهلة والحمقى المسفسطين،كلام ترمب واضح في نيته سرقة نفط وغاز ايران كما فعل في فنزويلا،وهاهو يعيد التأكيد على ذلك في آخر منشوراته:
قد ترغب السفن في الإبحار عبر هرمز،ومستعدة لدفع مبالغ لإيران أو الحرس الثوري،إلا أن قوانين الدول تجعله مستحيلاً،ليس فقط لإمكانية انتهاك هذه المدفوعات للعقوبات وقوانين تمويل الإرهاب التي تفرضها الحكومات،بل أيضا لأنها لا تستطيع منع المواطنين من رفع دعاوى قضائية تتعلق بتمويل الإرهاب.
Many people believe that INSURANCE is the reason that vessels are not navigating the Strait of Hormuz. This is simply not true, and something that @mercoglianos has addressed repeatedly throughout this conflict.
But there is a far more challenging hurdle that will need to be overcome: sanctions and terror financing laws.
Vessels are able to secure insurance, AND that insurance can cover transit through the Strait of Hormuz. Now is it more expensive than it was pre-conflict? Of course, but we're still talking about rates generally between 1-4%. If that is every journey perpetually? No, that's clearly an issue. But for a single journey to get a hundred million dollar vessel, loaded with hundreds of millions of dollars of cargo, alongside the captain and crew out of a war zone? Easy choice.
... And that's what Greek shipping tycoon Evangelos Marinakis thought as well when he said he would be happy to pay up to $200,000 per vessel to transit the Strait of Hormuz.
Now why wouldn't this work?
ASSUMING that you paid Iran via the Persian Gulf Strait Authority (PGSA), also known as the Tehran Toll Booth, you would be able to navigate under the assumption that Iran would not launch drones or missiles at your vessel. Is that a guarantee? Of course not, but this eliminates the "morality risk" element that many other people say is the "real" reason why vessels are unable to transit the Strait of Hormuz.
Insurance is not an issue. Crew safety, assuming a toll was paid, would not inherently be an issue... So why aren't vessels crossing the Strait of Hormuz in large numbers?
Sanctions and Terror Financing laws.
As it currently stands, this is the single greatest barrier as to why we are not seeing transit through the Strait of Hormuz, and why we will NOT see transit through the Strait of Hormuz the second an MOU is agreed upon by the United States and Iran.
Speaking to @abcnews today, I spoke to this risk, and why it's not just a "US problem":
"It really is kind of the single greatest barrier, because there's sanctions across various different countries, the US, UK, Canada, Australia, EU, and also terrorist-financing laws that are significant. You'd have, potentially, the individual who owns the company or who is operating the vessel, they would be personally sanctioned."
See the issue here? Many people have suggested, "Well if it REALLY is that great of an emergency, vessels will just pay the toll and risk sanctions".
Okay... but WOULD they? Would they PERSONALLY be willing to be sanctioned by the United States, EU, UK, Canada, and Australia? Effectively be personally cut off from the ENTIRE Western world? I don't think so.
Okay, okay, okay, Brett. But... what if the sanctions were just... not enforced! The governments just "looked the other way".
Enter terror financing laws. With the exception of the United Kingdom, the IRGC is a designated Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) across the jurisdictions of the US, EU, Canada, and Australia. While carveouts CAN be made for sanctions, although it is unclear whether or not they would be, nor that all jurisdictions would do so simultaneously as would be necessary, terror financing laws are a far greater hurdle to roll back.
This is EXACTLY what we saw take place when the United States unsanctioned Iranian oil under General License U in the early days of the Iran War. Roughly 180M barrels became effectively "sanction-free"... But the primary buyer was still overwhelmingly China... and India.
Why? Because, while the sanctions were not applicable, purchasing said oil would be in violation of terror financing laws across the US, EU, Canada, and Australia. Providing "payment" or "material support" (meaning no, you can't just "barter") to the IRGC comes with the lovely penalty of PRISON.
"Okay, okay, okay, Brett... But what if the governments of the US, UK, EU, Canada, and Australia didn't enforce sanctions AND the governments of the US, EU, Canada, and Australia didn't enforce terror financing laws... simultaneously..."
Wonderful question! Viola! Problem solved!
... Nope.
Under the terror financing laws of the United States and Canada, private citizens can bring forth lawsuits against those who finance terror organizations. And that's the nail in the coffin.
So while vessels may WANT to navigate the Strait of Hormuz. While vessels may be WILLING to make payments to Iran or the IRGC, the laws not just of the US, but also the UK, EU, Canada, and Australia, make this an impossibility due to the ability for these payments to violate not just the sanctions and terror financing laws brought forth by the GOVERNMENT... but because the governments can't stop private CITIZENS from bringing forth terror-financing lawsuits.
https://t.co/oV9p1KXXTo