Pedro Gago

[Pedro Gago @PGnum20]

The floor is the limit? $tsla

[Pedro Gago @PGnum20]

@TheSonOfWalkley One day we'll stop believing

[Pedro Gago @PGnum20]

@elonmusk For real this time?

[Pedro Gago @PGnum20]

@FTBLsection "it's a good warm-up before going to bed" 😉

[Pedro Gago @PGnum20]

@Maks_NAFO_FELLA I agree. And also all USA states should go back to being independent for the exact same reason.

[Pedro Gago @PGnum20]

Yep. You cannot be a brainless AI user.

[Andrej Karpathy @karpathy]

A number of people are talking about implications of AI to schools. I spoke about some of my thoughts to a school board earlier, some highlights:

1. You will never be able to detect the use of AI in homework. Full stop. All "detectors" of AI imo don't really work, can be defeated in various ways, and are in principle doomed to fail. You have to assume that any work done outside classroom has used AI.
2. Therefore, the majority of grading has to shift to in-class work (instead of at-home assignments), in settings where teachers can physically monitor students. The students remain motivated to learn how to solve problems without AI because they know they will be evaluated without it in class later.
3. We want students to be able to use AI, it is here to stay and it is extremely powerful, but we also don't want students to be naked in the world without it. Using the calculator as an example of a historically disruptive technology, school teaches you how to do all the basic math & arithmetic so that you can in principle do it by hand, even if calculators are pervasive and greatly speed up work in practical settings. In addition, you understand what it's doing for you, so should it give you a wrong answer (e.g. you mistyped "prompt"), you should be able to notice it, gut check it, verify it in some other way, etc. The verification ability is especially important in the case of AI, which is presently a lot more fallible in a great variety of ways compared to calculators.
4. A lot of the evaluation settings remain at teacher's discretion and involve a creative design space of no tools, cheatsheets, open book, provided AI responses, direct internet/AI access, etc.

TLDR the goal is that the students are proficient in the use of AI, but can also exist without it, and imo the only way to get there is to flip classes around and move the majority of testing to in class settings.

[Andrej Karpathy @karpathy]

A number of people are talking about implications of AI to schools. I spoke about some of my thoughts to a school board earlier, some highlights:

1. You will never be able to detect the use of AI in homework. Full stop. All "detectors" of AI imo don't really work, can be defeated in various ways, and are in principle doomed to fail. You have to assume that any work done outside classroom has used AI.
2. Therefore, the majority of grading has to shift to in-class work (instead of at-home assignments), in settings where teachers can physically monitor students. The students remain motivated to learn how to solve problems without AI because they know they will be evaluated without it in class later.
3. We want students to be able to use AI, it is here to stay and it is extremely powerful, but we also don't want students to be naked in the world without it. Using the calculator as an example of a historically disruptive technology, school teaches you how to do all the basic math & arithmetic so that you can in principle do it by hand, even if calculators are pervasive and greatly speed up work in practical settings. In addition, you understand what it's doing for you, so should it give you a wrong answer (e.g. you mistyped "prompt"), you should be able to notice it, gut check it, verify it in some other way, etc. The verification ability is especially important in the case of AI, which is presently a lot more fallible in a great variety of ways compared to calculators.
4. A lot of the evaluation settings remain at teacher's discretion and involve a creative design space of no tools, cheatsheets, open book, provided AI responses, direct internet/AI access, etc.

TLDR the goal is that the students are proficient in the use of AI, but can also exist without it, and imo the only way to get there is to flip classes around and move the majority of testing to in class settings.

[Pedro Gago @PGnum20]

@IvankaNews_ @Cristiano Trump probably doesn't even know it is 11 vs 11... and played with the feet

[Pedro Gago @PGnum20]

@elonmusk Pragmatism...

[Pedro Gago @PGnum20]

@elonmusk If Grok is so good... it should be really easy...

[Pedro Gago @PGnum20]

Finally on the way to $270? $TSLA

[Pedro Gago @PGnum20]

@investatrade Everyone scared of autonomy bet...

[Pedro Gago @PGnum20]

Bad news $TSLA ? What was it?

[Pedro Gago @PGnum20]

@M44_1RJ Is 2% "capitulation"? 🙄

[Pedro Gago @PGnum20]

@niccruzpatane Should be "fun" again for $TSLA 🙄

[Pedro Gago @PGnum20]

He said we have some rough quarters ahead ... Is this only the beginning? $tsla @elonmusk

[Pedro Gago @PGnum20]

@investatrade That's a way of getting comments :)

[Pedro Gago @PGnum20]

@farzyness Where will the money come from when humans do not work?... Who will the companies sell to?

[Pedro Gago @PGnum20]

@elonmusk Anything is possible... but 20T does not seem doable with a part time CEO and politician...

[Pedro Gago @PGnum20]

@matthughes13 You may zoom out just a bit more... 😉