Paloma McLardy

Truth sets you free, lies enslave you. Punk Rock Pioneer London76- Slits & Raincoats drummer. I love my family, regenerative agriculture & local solutions.

[Paloma McLardy @PMcLardy]

@CapitalVissionX 16

[Paloma McLardy @PMcLardy]

@SecKennedy All the work we did for this????
What a disgrace! I spend 2 years of my life campaigning for you. I’m sorry I did this. Your critics are not fear mongers. You have flip

[Valerie Anne Smith @ValerieAnne1970]

IVERMECTIN: FULL DOSAGE SCHEDULE FOR CANCER & PREVENTION

1000s of people use Dr. William Makis MD’s IVERMECTIN dosing chart. Here’s a clear, categorized breakdown based on body weight (mg/kg per day).

LOW DOSE: ≤ 0.5 mg/kg/day
**Best for:**
- Cancers in remission
- Strong family history or genetic predisposition
- Prophylaxis (preventive)
**Side effects:** No long-term side effects reported.
**Example:** Dr. Tess Lawrie reported a Stage 3 ovarian cancer case treated with chemo + 12 mg ivermectin daily. Tumor marker CA125 dropped from 288 to 22 after 2 months and the tumor vanished.

MEDIUM DOSE: 1.0 mg/kg/day
**Best for:** Starting dose for **most cancers** (lung, pancreatic, renal cell, gastric, etc.).
**Side effects:** No long-term side effects reported.
**Example:** Dr. Shankara Chetty’s 70-year-old prostate cancer patient (PSA 89) took 45 mg/day (plus lactoferrin). After two months PSA fell to 10.9.

HIGH DOSE: 2.0 mg/kg/day
**Best for:** Very aggressive cancers (leukemia, pancreatic, brain cancers).
**Side effects:** No long-term side effects reported.
**Example:** Dr. Allan Landrito’s Stage 4 gallbladder cancer patient took 2 mg/kg daily for 14 months — cancer disappeared.

VERY HIGH DOSE: ≥ 2.5 mg/kg/day
**Best for:** Extensive metastatic disease, extremely poor prognosis, or certain brain cancers.
**Side effects:** Possible short-term & transient visual effects (usually resolve in a few days).
**Example:** Dr. Shankara Chetty treated a patient with 2.5 mg/kg/day — no side effects reported.

**Quick conversion example (for a 60 kg / 132 lb person):**
- Low: ≤30 mg/day
- Medium: 60 mg/day (≈5×12 mg tablets or 1 teaspoon liquid)
- High: 120 mg/day
- Very High: ≥150 mg/day

Many anecdotal reports exist of long-term daily use (months to over a year) with no serious toxicity, but individual responses vary.

Always work with a knowledgeable clinician, especially if you have pre-existing conditions (e.g., vision issues or glaucoma). This is for educational purposes only.

Share to spread awareness — information is power. 💊

[Paloma McLardy @PMcLardy]

@SecKennedy PLEASE RESIGN!! tRUMP lied to you, and through you all of us that were campaigning for you!

[Joe Kent @joekent16jan19]

Trump believes he is threatening Iran with destruction, but it is America that now stands in danger.

If he attempts to eradicate Iranian civilization, the United States will no longer be viewed as a stabilizing force in the world, but as an agent of chaos—effectively ending our status as the world’s greatest superpower.

This would upend our economy and shatter the global order. The process is already underway, yet we still have time to avert catastrophe if Trump finds the courage to pursue serious negotiations rather than reckless rage and destruction.

[Paloma McLardy @PMcLardy]

@AmericaRedVoice Yes!!!

[Paloma McLardy @PMcLardy]

@RightScopee 👍

[Paloma McLardy @PMcLardy]

@SecKennedy @USDA @SecRollins This is the opposite of what we worked for, add inmmunity to Glyphosate. I feel betrayed.

[The Vigilant Fox 🦊 @VigilantFox]

Something shocking just happened and barely anyone is talking about it.

Tucked within the 2026 Farm Bill is an alarming provision. Farmers who adopt AI and precision agriculture technologies will be reimbursed for it—90% of the total cost. And the standards governing this tech won’t be set by the USDA, but by the tech industry itself.

An article from Fortune titled ‘The 2026 farm bill quietly hands big tech control over American farmland. Here’s the fine print’ reads:

Tucked inside the 2026 Farm Bill is a provision that would reimburse farmers 90% of the cost of adopting AI and precision agriculture technologies—15 percentage points above the normal EQIP cap.The private sector standards governing those technologies would be set not by the USDA, but by the tech industry itself.This could be a Trojan horse of sorts for something called “precision agriculture” and artificial intelligence (AI), which big tech firms will be able take advantage of farmers and further wrest control over the food system from them.

The article goes on to describe precision agriculture, saying:

Not only is precision agriculture defined, but it is complemented by a list of what are deemed appropriate technologies, including GPS, yield monitors, data management software, and the particularly strange sounding, “Internet of Things and telematics technologies.”That last bizarre phrase, which most would probably consider a typo, is actually a concept that abounds in tech company circles. One definition from an industry leader notes that the “Internet of Things,” or IoT, is the “network of physical objects — “things” — that are embedded with sensors, software, and other technologies for the purpose of connecting and exchanging data with other devices and systems.”

You read that right. They’re connecting your food to AI.

Paired with this definition is the government opening the way for corporations to have, well, a “field day” with precision agriculture, including for AI. Tucked away in the Rural Development Title, is the “promoting precision agriculture” subsection. AI, we are told particularly, is to be guided by “private sector-led interconnectivity standards, guidelines, and best practices.”

In short, this is a Big Tech takeover of our food supply.

But what does that really mean?

According to the proponents of Agenda 2030, of which Big Tech are, they want us to consume zero meat and zero real dairy, everything must be bioengineered, and our food must contain vaccines.

While we’ve seen legislative efforts to stop that from occurring, but when private companies with billions of dollars to spare on lawsuits seize control of the food supply and you have no options left, guess what happens?

mRNA lettuce. And bioengineered everything.

They even admit the aim is to have the food connected to AI. Thus, consuming it would presumably connect you and your loved ones to AI, too.

Not only is this a privacy and complete control nightmare technocrats of old could have only dreamed of, this opens up a range of issues for a whole host of diseases humans will undoubtedly start to suffer from, because this will not be real food.

Joining us now to discuss one of the solutions to metabolic health and the increased threat on it is Ryan Richardson. 🧵

[Paloma McLardy @PMcLardy]

@thatdankent Wow

[Paloma McLardy @PMcLardy]

@TulsiGabbard His will is very clear!!! love your enemy …. blessed are the peacemakers. The cabinet is not trying to listen to Jesus the prince of peace. They’re listening to crazy people like Lindsay Graham stop pretending. It is hurting the gospel.

[Paloma McLardy @PMcLardy]

@DNIGabbard @TulsiGabbard You know better than just gloss over! He put you there as a trophy, he doesn’t care what you think. He is a liar. He was elected because he said he was going bring peace to the world and look at what a wreck he doing all over. He violated all his promises to his voters.

[Reseth @ResethO]

Thomas Massie is one of the best people we have in our government.

[Paloma McLardy @PMcLardy]

@RobertKennedyJc Yes!

[Paloma McLardy @PMcLardy]

@PunkRockStory Thank you!

[Paloma McLardy @PMcLardy]

@RedLineReportt Yes!!!

[Paloma McLardy @PMcLardy]

@timony001 👍🏼💯

[Mel @Villgecrazylady]

Bill Ackman just confirmed he hosted his meeting with Charlie on August 4th and 5th.

Here’s Charlie talking to Megyn Kelly the very next day on August 6th.

Now how do you think that meeting went down?

[Humanspective @Humanspective]

@elonmusk The Left is the party of "Mass Formation Psychosis"?
https://t.co/mjM9a3KRpi

[Paloma McLardy @PMcLardy]

@ElephantSignal 👍🏼

[James O'Keefe @JamesOKeefeIII]

Congressman Thomas Massie stood with Jeffrey Epstein survivors at a historic press conference on Capitol Hill, demanding the full release of the Epstein Files. Those demands were echoed by allies from both parties.

According to Massie, Speaker Mike Johnson is pushing a placebo resolution, billionaires are spending millions to crush him, and congress members whisper support in private but stay silent in public.

I showed Massie a preview of our DOJ investigation that confirmed the pattern of obfuscation that he has been seeing happen around the full Epstein files release.

But Massie isn’t backing down. He says the truth will come out, and when it does, D.C. will have to choose between protecting the powerful or standing with the survivors.

Epstein Files Transparency Bill Press Conference (1:50)
Why Trump Calls the Bill a “Hostile Act” (4:07)
Rep. Massie Reacts to OMG’s DOJ Epstein Tapes (6:40)
Why the Epstein Client List Remains Hidden (9:06)
‘Private Support, Public Silence’ (11:10)
The Outlook for the Transparency Bill (14:28)
The Constitution’s Speech or Debate Clause (15:45)
The Price of Telling the Truth (16:37)
Is Trump in the Epstein Files? (20:36)
Should More Reps Go Public? (21:15)
“My Price Is My Life” (23:00)
Inside the SCIF (23:55)
Redactions and Concealed Truths (29:31)
The Evil Reality of Epstein’s Crimes (31:08)
When the Government Lets Criminals Walk Free (33:11)

@RepThomasMassie @MassieforKY

Listen & Subscribe to My Price Is My Life –
Website: https://t.co/1DhxbWvK9k
Spotify: https://t.co/LK9rnpjO6T
Apple Podcasts: https://t.co/BmXWimw0I6
YouTube: https://t.co/fVtd5ujW5O