@BidariSreenivas@Aabhas24 Hindus have to take inspiration from these two great places. Somnath an example of rebuilding again and agan inspite of several destruction. Ram Mandir a longest battle of 492 years to reclaim the prabhu Ram's birth place. Both are unique civilisational battles.
Special Definitions in India:-
1. Atheist: One who selectively hates Hinduism.
2. Secular: One who loves all religions except Hinduism.
3. Freedom of Speech: Hate speech against Hinduism.
4. Freedom of Artistic Expression: Showing Hinduism in a bad light in films & art.
5. Feminist: One who selectively attacks Hindu patriarchy.
6. Animal Activist: One who sees animal cruelty due to Hindu traditions only.
7. Environmentalist: One who can't breathe during Hindu festivals.
@rajat_kachari@Basudi123@HPhobiaWatch I still fail to understand why they choose to go to Kashmir as tourist. Knowing very well how the Jihadis operate that too after coming from Bangladesh.
@SmestarZ@VictorVonS_ Looks like Leftist and Karachiwood is hitting two birds with one stone. First hype the budget and use that money to fund anti India and Hinduphobic projects, on the other side by creating a crap movie with so much money and then play victimhood and blame Ramayan for the loss😁
Those who celebrated Col Purohit rotting in jail for 8 years without bail despite zero evidence, are today outraging against courts denying bail to Umar despite a 3000 page chargesheet against him for planning riots being damning.
My views on @ndtv, on the ecosystem's hypocrisy:
@JimJimCoCo@Saurabh_MLAgk In the name of inclusivity we are excluding one's own identity. That's why one can celebrate Christmas in a Christian missionary school and not Dewali.
Beheaded?
Your fault, your loose tongue.
Blown apart?
Your fault, your weak security.
Terrorist caught?
Your fault, your radicalizing rhetorics.
It’s everybody’s fault except…
The imam who directs jihad,
The doctor who stockpiles explosives,
The engineer who puts together the bombs,
The “bright scholar” who wears the best,
The lady who recruits jihadis, or
The ideology that demands all of this.
Right now, if Pak were to invade India, I can bet they’ll blame our “anti-Pak rhetoric” for inciting an otherwise peaceful neighbor.
Don’t waste empathy on these scumbags.
Yes Khatoon @_sabanaqvi , the onus is on Muslims to condemn Islamic terror, especially Muslims who call themselves ‘liberal and moderate’, IF such a species exists in Bharat!
Your tweet is a giant logical shortcut that hides scale, pattern and ideology and equates three political assassinations in the last 78 years of independent Bharat with mass-casualty jihadist Islamic terrorism explicitly targeting innocent civilians.
Let me give you some data, Between 2000–2023, India suffered roughly 4,000+ terror attacks. More than 95% were directly linked to Islamic outfits. Islamist terror is part of a global ideological ecosystem. India is hit by the same hate-filled cultish ideology that has attacked US, UK, Israel, Australia, Spain and many other countries in the world.
When a terror ecosystem is global, and based on one book that preaches hatred towards ‘others’, the same book that people like you still hold sacred, the demand for condemnation becomes collective, not communal!
Also, Indian Muslims are quick to condemn alleged atrocities in Gaza or on Rohingyas in Burma, what stops them from condemning terror acts in Bharat?
The fact that you would indulge in this ridiculous whataboutery rather than clearly condemn the #DelhiBlast, says a LOT about the hypocrisy of so-called ‘liberal Muslim elite’ like yourself!
Calling every fear “Islamophobia” is one of the most absurd modern propaganda tricks.
People don’t become scared of Muslims out of random bigotry. They become scared because terrorist groups explicitly invoke Islam when they murder innocent people. When attackers shout religious slogans during blasts, it is normal human psychology to associate that fear with the ideology the attackers claim to represent.
Yet instead of acknowledging this reality, many “moderate voices” take the laziest escape route: shame the frightened public, label them “Islamophobic,” and pretend the problem is people’s fear, not the terrorism that created it. How is that rational? It’s not. It’s gaslighting.
If terrorism is being committed in the name of Islam, then the first and loudest condemnation should come from within the community: “These terrorists are defaming our faith,” “They are criminals hiding behind religion,” “They do not represent us.”
But often the opposite happens. Many stay silent or offer generic lines like “terror has no religion.” And then, astonishingly, the anger is redirected not at the terrorists but at the people who feel unsafe.
In any other field: if a doctor commits malpractice, other doctors condemn him. If a soldier commits a war crime, the army distances itself. If a priest abuses children, the Church is expected to confront it.
But when terrorists kill citing Islamic justification, many act as if acknowledging the link is an insult, and instead blame those reacting to the violence. That’s not how trust is built or fear addressed.
And it’s definitely not how a community protects its reputation. Blaming victims of fear instead of the creators of fear is a masterclass in moral inversion.
Stop pretending 'Education will fix everything'. As J Sai Deepak says, CRACK DOWN on the hammers like UP is doing👏🏼
~ "Engage those who stand with Bharat, but never forget, DEMOGRAPHY shapes destiny.
Kashmir, Bengal, Assam, Kerala.. the signs are LOUD."
Trailblazer Sheetal Devi from J&K makes history as the first Indian para athlete to join the able-bodied national archery team.
The 18-year-old world champion will represent India at the Asia Cup Stage 3 in Jeddah (Dec 10–15), inspiring millions with her grit and talent.
#SheetalDevi #IndianArchery #ParaAthlete
The British Empire did so much.
They created ‘Chaklas’ for regular sexual abuse of Indian women and minor girls.
Each British regiment, generally would consist of about 1000 soldiers, was assigned 12 to 15 Indian women who resided in specific houses/tents called chaklas. These women were exclusively for British soldiers, registered and issued licenses to practice prostitution. The chaklas were managed by a superintendent known as the “mahaldarni,” who was also responsible for procuring more women when required.
Women who attempted to escape were punished severely. The system was created in such a manner that it trapped and exploited women to the maximum, with the military fixing low prices for soldiers’ visits to ensure easy accessibility.
Women were forcibly recruited, where policemen and military officials abducted young girls, often aged 14–16, from villages. These girls were selected for their appearance, presented to commanding officers for approval, and then licensed for prostitution. ‘Fresh, innocent girls’ were brought to replace diseased older women, and the latter were expelled from cantonments without regards for their survival outside the chaklas.
Refer : ‘The Queen's Daughters in India,’ (1898) by Elizabeth W. Andrew and Katharine C. Bushnell
Nothing wrong with having the Union Jack in a corner of our flag. We must take note of virtues of the British - MK Gandhi
The virtuous British killed 35 million Indians, manufactured 12 famines, drove our life expectancy to a mere 32 years, looted $ 45 trillion, broke us in two.