PROPFIRM HUB 🤝

Exposing shady firms | Promoting trusted ones.
|Giveaways|Reviews|Insights
📩DM FOR PAYOUT CASES

[PROPFIRM HUB 🤝 @PROPFIRMS_HUB]

@pnaintrades Bro I have received many payout cases of funded rooms.

[PROPFIRM HUB 🤝 @PROPFIRMS_HUB]

Biggest scammer in prop firm industry

[Fundex Sagar @FUNDEX_SAGAR]

The funded room Big Scam😞😱 Literally Itna bada Sc...m!! 🥲 @thefundedroom @ProfessorAnkit_ @Bhuneshwar763 @OmkarPawar8055 @Rajayadavruz

[PROPFIRM HUB 🤝 @PROPFIRMS_HUB]

Mistakes and misunderstandings happen, but shutting out someone who genuinely championed your platform isn't the way.
Even an enemy is granted a chance to defend themselves; a loyal supporter deserves at least a listening ear.
@Khldfx @avikkfp @Sai_Prasan @yasshh7 @anandfx_og please give him a fair chance to present his feedback and clear the air.

[Rudra Jaisara @rudra_jaisara]

Got banned from my favourite Prop Firm Today😭

@Khldfx if you can give 1 chance, i just wanted to give feedback as a Trader.

Never felt this bad, even on my biggest loss trading day.😔

Wanted to frame my 100k Diamond Certificate.

I apologise for that.

There's a Proverb in Hindi - दंड देने वाले से बड़ा क्षमा करने वाला होता है।

@avikkfp @Sai_Prasan @yasshh7 @anandfx_og if you guys can help me convince him.

[PROPFIRM HUB 🤝 @PROPFIRMS_HUB]

.@KhaledFX @FundingPips Bringing visibility to a concerning situation with a genuine trader who needs management review.
• Trader passed evaluation & received an initial payout
• All accounts abruptly terminated over alleged "fake documents"
• Offered live video KYC / face-to-camera verification immediately
• 20+ support tickets closed with canned "final decision" responses
If a trader is ready to verify live on camera with original IDs, they deserve a fair hearing rather than an automated brush-off. Please look into this case.

[Ali Shair @Alishairx]

Day 4, and I'm still waiting for someone at @fundingpips to take this matter seriously.
A trader's account, hard work, and time deserve respect. If there is a violation, show the evidence. If a decision has been made, explain it clearly.

@Khldfx @avikkfp

[PROPFIRM HUB 🤝 @PROPFIRMS_HUB]

🚨 Is @MyForexFunds making trading unnecessarily complicated with its rule structure?

Honestly, some of the worst rule systems I’ve seen in the prop firm industry. Traders need clarity, not complicated strike-based restrictions that make risk management harder than it needs to be.

Let’s settle this:

1️⃣ Strike-based rules like MyForexFunds.

2️⃣ Clear Daily Drawdown + Maximum Drawdown limits like FTMO.

Which model would you trust with your money?

👇 Let’s hear from traders.

[PROPFIRM HUB 🤝 @PROPFIRMS_HUB]

Let's not jump to bankruptcy claims without solid evidence.

@Tradeify is a major player in the prop firm industry. Pending payouts or processing delays deserve scrutiny, but they do not automatically mean a company is heading towards bankruptcy.

If there are genuine payout issues, let's document them properly instead of spreading assumptions.

Traders, let's hear directly from you:

- Whose payout has been rejected?
- Whose payout is still pending?
- How much is involved, and how long have you been waiting?

Drop your X ID, payout amount and current status in the comments. Let's separate verified cases from speculation.

Accountability matters. So does responsible reporting. Traders deserve facts, not unnecessary panic.

[PROPFIRM HUB 🤝 @PROPFIRMS_HUB]

🎁 $15,000 Challenge Accounts Giveaway 🎁

How to enter:
✅ Follow @funderblu , @PROPFIRMS_HUB here
✅ Like & Repost this post
✅ Mention 3 friends
✅ Join our Discord: https://t.co/PxMCZodWfU

⚡ Winners will be announced in 4 days

[PROPFIRM HUB 🤝 @PROPFIRMS_HUB]

🚨 BLUE GUARDIAN FACES QUESTIONS OVER SYSTEMIC PAYOUT ACCESS DELAYS
Operational concerns are mounting at @BlueGuardiancom as traders report persistent technical barriers preventing withdrawal submissions.
The Situation:
Trader @BrandonMangan3 reports being blocked from submitting an earned $10,000 payout request for over two weeks. According to the trader, the withdrawal portal has remained inaccessible, while support responses cite ongoing technical investigations without providing concrete resolution timelines.
Similar reports have surfaced across community channels, pointing to a wider infrastructure issue rather than an isolated glitch.
Key expectations for @BlueGuardiancom:
1. What specific backend or gateway issue is restricting dashboard payout functionality?
2. What is the confirmed timeline for full restoration and processing of pending requests?
3. What proactive measures are being taken to keep affected traders informed?
When traders pass evaluations and satisfy compliance criteria, payout infrastructure must remain functional and reliable. Prolonged delays paired with vague updates erode trader trust.
cc: @BlueGuardiancom @BrandonMangan3
Have you experienced similar portal issues or payout submission delays with Blue Guardian recently? Let us know below.
#BlueGuardian #PropFirm #TradingCommunity #PayoutDispute #ForexTrading #Transparency

[PROPFIRM HUB 🤝 @PROPFIRMS_HUB]

Congratulations for your first ever payout
May God bless you 🤞

[Dipak Bhole @DipsBhole]

@Alpha_Futures_ Thanks for the first payout. My wire transfer method was not successful. I got in touch with Moses and Matthew and other moderators on Discord. All of them helped. Grateful for the assistance.

Hopefully many more payouts to come 🤞

Regards

[PROPFIRM HUB 🤝 @PROPFIRMS_HUB]

🚀 THE WAIT IS FINALLY OVER! PIPSTONE INSTANT PRO IS HERE!

A completely new instant funding experience, built with 10+ exciting features to give traders more freedom and fewer restrictions. 👀

Here’s what makes Instant Pro stand out:

🔥 Unlimited Daily Rewards
🔥 No Cap on Daily Withdrawals
⚡ Instant Funding
✅ No Consistency Rules
⏳ No Account Expiry
📊 MT5 & cTrader Support

And here’s the game-changer: Rewards approved within 60 seconds – guaranteed!

More flexibility, fewer restrictions, and faster access to your rewards.

Pipstone Capital is raising the bar for instant funding! 🏆

Explore Instant Pro now and experience the difference.

@Pipstonecapital

#PipstoneCapital #InstantPro #PropTrading

[Pipstone Capital @Pipstonecapital]

🚀 THE WAIT IS OVER. INSTANT PRO ACCOUNTS ARE HERE!

Packed with 10+ new features, Instant Pro is designed to give traders more flexibility and fewer restrictions, making it one of the most lenient instant account models in the industry.

And the best part? 👀

🔥 UNLIMITED DAILY REWARDS.
🔥 NO CAP ON DAILY WITHDRAWALS.

Your trading journey just got a whole lot better.

Experience the next level of trading with Pipstone Capital.

#PipstoneCapital #InstantPro #PropTrading #TradingRewards

[PROPFIRM HUB 🤝 @PROPFIRMS_HUB]

🚨 FUNDING PIPS UNDER SCRUTINY: PATTERN OF DEVICE ID & COPY-TRADING BREACHES
A documented case out of India raises critical questions regarding account enforcement timing and dispute resolution practices at @FundingPips.
The Case:
A trader completed a $50K 1-Step evaluation, reached Master funded status, and gained +2.5% on day one. The following morning, his open trade was liquidated, all accounts were terminated citing a "CID/Device ID" and copy-trading breach, and $1,235.75 in earned profit alongside challenge fees was withheld.
Core Operational Inconsistencies:
1. Pre-Breach History: The trader purchased and traded 15+ evaluation accounts on the exact same device without a single system warning. Why are Device ID flags only triggered once an account transitions to live profitability?
2. Dispute Suppression: Following the termination, the trader was banned from community channels, and copyright/takedown attempts were reportedly filed against public posts documenting the dispute.
3. Global Trend: This mirrors similar reported cases across Pakistan, Morocco, and Nigeria—traders passing evaluations, entering profit, and facing sudden Device ID/CID terminations without transparent technical logs provided.
Evaluation fees cannot be accepted seamlessly while compliance enforcement is applied selectively only after payouts are on the line.
Traders require verifiable, forensic proof for every breach—not retroactive enforcement after fees have cleared.
cc: @FundingPips
Have you faced sudden CID or Device ID breaches on funded stages? Share your case and documentation below.
#FundingPips #PropFirm #TradingCommunity #PayoutDispute #Transparency #ForexTrading

[Shahzaib Khan @ranashazaibkhan]

🚨 SCAMPIPS CASE #0004 🚨

🇮🇳 India. And this one has a new chapter: they tried to delete him off the internet.

👤 Trader: H*****, India
💰 1-Step, $50K. PASSED. Master account live.
📈 Up 2.5% on the funded account.
📅 Oct 6, 2026. Early morning, the day after the profit.
🔒 CID breach + "copy trading". Running trade force closed. All accounts permanently closed.
💸 $1,235.75 withheld. Fee not refunded. Payout share never paid.

He passed. He got funded. He put the account 2.5% in profit on day one. The next morning, before the London open, FundingPips closed his open trade, closed his Master, closed every account he had, and sent the email.

🚨 THEY SOLD HIM MORE THAN 15 ACCOUNTS FIRST. 🚨

Read that properly. Fifteen plus challenges. Fifteen plus fees. Same device, same person, same "CID" the whole time. Not one flag. Not one warning. Not one "we noticed something." The system that can detect a Device ID match in hours let him buy fifteen times without blinking.

Then he reached Master. Then he turned green. Then, overnight, the CID became a crime.

The fees were fine. The payout was the problem.

🚨 THEN THEY BLOCKED HIM. 🚨

He complained in the FundingPips Discord. They blocked him. He could not send messages. He made a reel about it on Instagram. They reported the reel to get it taken down. Multiple review attempts. It stayed up.

Think about what that is. A firm that will not reply to a trader's email, will not refund his fee, will not pay his share, but will find the time to file takedown requests against his Instagram.

They had time for the reel. Not for the refund.

📋Four cases. Four different countries.

🇵🇰 Pakistan: funded, "Device ID", closed 12 days before payout.
🇲🇦 Morocco: $100K pass, "copy trading" using FundingPips' own copier.
🇳🇬 Nigeria: $100K pass, "Device ID", terminated same day, $533 kept.
🏅 Case 3: 7 payouts, "reverse trading", 4 trades of 0.1 lots.
🇮🇳 India: $50K Master, 2.5% up, "CID", 15+ accounts sold first, $1,235 kept, Discord blocked, reel reported.

Every one of them passed. Every one of them was closed after passing. Every one got the same sentence about evidence attached. Nobody has seen a comparison.

@FundingPips, you took fifteen fees from this man before you "discovered" his device. Which was it? Fifteen mistakes, or one decision?

📁 https://t.co/F1nWvR5ecK
You can block a Discord account. You cannot block a public record.

RT. India, check your inbox.

[PROPFIRM HUB 🤝 @PROPFIRMS_HUB]

🚨 UPCOMERS UNDER SCRUTINY: $12,955 PAYOUT DISPUTE
Another high-stakes payout denial has emerged, raising crucial questions around rule interpretation and enforcement transparency.
The Situation:
Trader @_featherstones claims @upcomers_com has withheld $12,955.42 in net profits across 184 trades (Account #716362, Oct 5 – Nov 5, 2026). The firm cited prohibited/group trading strategies, while the trader strongly denies the allegations—stating execution was purely independent partial take-profits and scaling out.
5 Key Questions for @upcomers_com:
1. What exact strategy or latency model triggered the prohibited flag?
2. Which specific order IDs and execution timestamps form the basis of this claim?
3. Does standard scaling out or partial TP violate current published terms?
4. Which specific contract clause warrants withholding the entire payout balance?
5. Is there a formal, transparent appeals process with documented trade logs provided to the trader?
Withholding nearly $13,000 requires verifiable, data-backed evidence. Clear rules mean nothing without consistent, objective application.
Traders deserve transparency. Firms deserve evidence-based assessment.
cc: @upcomers_com @_featherstones
What is your take on this dispute? Share your thoughts below.
#Upcomers #PropFirm #TradingCommunity #PayoutDispute #transparency

[codie featherstone @_featherstones]

SCAM stay away from @upcomers_com prop had $12995 took from my account and withdrawal denied! broke no rules, just did a prohibited strategy!
i close out partial profit as im a single trader so scale out of a trade ! stay away please
#upcomers #PropFirm

[PROPFIRM HUB 🤝 @PROPFIRMS_HUB]

🚨 FUNDINGPIPS CEO KHALED AYESH WARNS PAKISTANI TRADERS COUNTRY-WIDE BAN POSSIBLE!

Khaled raises concerns over alleged fake documents, shared accounts and group trading, warning that such activities could put genuine traders at risk of country-wide restrictions.

Should legitimate traders face consequences for the actions of others?

#FundingPips #KhaledAyesh #PakistanTraders #PropFirmNews

[PROPFIRM HUB 🤝 @PROPFIRMS_HUB]

🚨 FUNDEDSQUAD: $2,178 PAYOUT REJECTED OVER COPY-TRADING ALLEGATION
Another significant payout dispute has emerged involving @fundedsquad, raising critical questions about account enforcement and review protocols.
The Case:
Trader @AjayVasoliya requested a $2,178.75 payout (70% split on $3,112.50 profit) on account #259914. The withdrawal was rejected, followed by an account breach notification 10–12 days later citing coordinated/copy trading.
While @fundedsquad provided a risk report flagging overlapping XAUUSD trade timestamps across three accounts, @AjayVasoliya has made the report public, firmly disputing the methodology and arguing the execution data does not prove coordination.
Key questions requiring clarity from leadership:
1. What exact threshold or latency methodology determines "coordinated trading" vs. independent execution on major pairs?
2. Were all flagged accounts independently verified?
3. Why was the payout denied days prior to an official breach status?
4. Will the firm address the specific discrepancies cited in the trader's dispute?
Transparency is the foundation of trust in the prop trading space. Both trader data and firm risk models deserve open scrutiny and clear, documented explanations.
cc: @ajwadthefalcon @fundedsquad @AjayVasoliya
Have you experienced similar issues or reviewed these logs? Share your perspective below.
#FundedSquad #PropFirm #TradingCommunity #PayoutDispute #Transparency

[Prop Firm Shinobi @PropFirmShinobi]

🚨 FUNDEDSQUAD: $2,178 PAYOUT REJECTED OVER COPY TRADING AJAY VASOLIYA DEMANDS PROOF!

@fundedsquad @ajwadthefalcon

Another payout dispute has surfaced involving FundedSquad.

@AjayVasoliya says his withdrawal was rejected over an alleged copy-trading violation, and he strongly disputes the firm's findings.

WHAT HAPPENED?

🔴 Trader: Ajay Vasoliya (@AjayVasoliya)

• Account: #259914
• Amount before profit split: $3,112.50
• Profit split: 70%
• Requested payout: $2,178.75

The trader says his payout was rejected and his account breached 10–12 days later.

He claims the trade times, prices and profit/loss figures do not establish copy trading and says his requests for further clarification went unanswered.

BUT FUNDEDSQUAD HAS ALSO SHARED ITS RISK TEAM REPORT.

The October 21 email alleges coordinated trading between account #259914 and multiple other accounts.

The firm listed:

- Account 25XXXX65: 7 matching trades
- Account 21XXXX12: 13 matching trades
- Account 20XXXX68: 8 matching trades

The attached spreadsheet contains XAUUSD trade records, timestamps, direction and profit/loss comparisons.

The trader disputes the interpretation of these matches and has shared the report publicly.

@ajwadthefalcon WE NEED CLARITY:

1. What methodology was used to determine these trades were coordinated?
2. Were the matching accounts independently investigated?
3. Can the firm explain the matching trades individually, including entry and exit times?
4. Why does the trader say his requests for clarification received no response?
5. Why was the payout rejected before the later account breach notification?

This case deserves a proper examination of both the trader's evidence and the firm's risk report.

A spreadsheet showing similarities deserves scrutiny, and a copy-trading allegation deserves a clear explanation.

@fundedsquad @ajwadthefalcon will you provide a detailed response to Ajay's questions?

HAVE YOU ALSO FACED A COPY-TRADING ALLEGATION OR REJECTED PAYOUT FROM FUNDEDSQUAD?

Share your case, account details and supporting evidence in the comments.

#FundedSquad #AjayVasoliya #AjwadSaleem #PayoutIssues #PropFirm
@AjayVasoliya

[PROPFIRM HUB 🤝 @PROPFIRMS_HUB]

🚨 ONE DAY BEFORE PAYOUT, NYSMARKETS TERMINATES ACCOUNT 🚨
Another concerning case raising serious questions about consistency and transparency. Trader @Musab_ab claims @NYSMarkets terminated his account just one day before becoming eligible for a payout.
Initially, the firm cited a violation of its 2% risk rule. However, after submitting evidence and requesting a review, investigation showed he had NOT breached that limit.
Yet, a different rule was subsequently used to justify the account breach. Why did the reason for the breach change after the trader challenged the initial decision?
Traders deserve clear explanations backed by evidence. Fair rules mean nothing without fair and consistent enforcement.
What is your take on this?
@NYSMarkets @pakothawani @Musab_ab #NYSMarkets #TradingCommunity #PropFirm #Transparency #FairRules

[MUS’AB AG @Musab__ag]

🚨 I AM REQUESTING FAIRNESS AND TRANSPARENCY ! @NYSMarkets

How can a trader work hard 😓 day and night one day left to request payout and breach my account with no standard reason !

Here is all proof they breach my account. They said am exceed the max 2% rules.
I contact they support and send them the details to review after they finish reviewing they seeing am not exceeding that

They charge me on other rule apart which they not apply it

PLEASE I DESERVE JUSTICE 🙏

#PropFirm #fundedTraders #ForexTrading

[PROPFIRM HUB 🤝 @PROPFIRMS_HUB]

🚨 Equity Edge: $1,027 Payout Dispute & Blocked Account Demand Answers
Trader @olamicryptofx01 is challenging @EquityEdgeUK after a reported $1,027 payout rejection and account termination over alleged "group trading"—an accusation the trader firmly denies.
Case Details:
• Account: $50,000 funded account with $1,138.40 in generated profit
• Deduction: A -$1,027.00 entry labeled "Balance Reset on Payout Rejection" dated Feb 24, 2026
• Current Status: Account blocked with no resolution provided after multiple months of outreach
Key Questions for @EquityEdgeUK:
1. What verifiable trade logs or IP/order data support the group trading allegation?
2. Which specific accounts or executions were allegedly linked?
3. What is the formal appeal path when a trader is locked out of their dashboard?
Allegations of copy or group trading require transparent, data-backed evidence. Prolonged silence and unexplained deductions undermine community trust.
@EquityEdgeUK

[PROPFIRM HUB 🤝 @PROPFIRMS_HUB]

🚨 The Funded Room: Growing Trader Concerns Demand Clear Answers
Recent reports from Nov 6–10 regarding @thefundedroom / @thetraderoom_ have raised critical questions around account breaches, "toxic trading" flags, and delayed payouts:
• @SwarnaReddy2729 ($20K Payout Dispute): Account banned post-payout request over alleged daily loss/toxic trading breaches on Oct 2; trader disputes calculations and seeks exact floating-loss data.
• @RajeshSahfv ($50K Account Failure): Terminated for an alleged second HFT violation, yet the breach notice cited the identical Oct 28 orders from warning #1 without providing new timestamps.
• Multiple Delays & Review Flags: Community reports indicate multi-week review queues, vague rule enforcement, and rejections right at payout stage.
Protecting a firm against abuse is valid, but enforcement requires verifiable trade logs, clear clause citations, and an objective appeals process.
Drop your experience below:
If you’ve experienced an unexplained breach, prolonged review, or payout rejection, share your case details and screenshots. Both traders and firms deserve transparent, evidence-based accountability.
cc: Mayank Raj @thetraderoom_

[PROPFIRM HUB 🤝 @PROPFIRMS_HUB]

@futureifycom Check dm

[PROPFIRM HUB 🤝 @PROPFIRMS_HUB]

REJECTED HIS $1,800 APPROVED PAYOUT AFTER SIX MONTHS!

Imagine waiting SIX MONTHS for a payout that you claim was already approved, only to receive a rejection email out of nowhere.

According to the trader, his $1,800 payout had been approved, but after months of waiting, @QtFunded suddenly rejected it.

If these claims are accurate, this raises serious concerns about payout transparency and trader trust.

Traders deserve clear communication, fair treatment, and accountability from prop firms.

The trading community deserves answers.

[Blacklion @kingposhi]

Imagine waiting SIX MONTHS for a payout that @QtFunded already APPROVED, only to receive a rejection email out of nowhere.

An approved $1,800 payout, and suddenly you are telling me it has been rejected 🤡🤡🤡

[Goat Funded Futures @GFFutures]

⚡ FLASH SALE: 55% OFF EVERY PLAN ⚡

Every plan, every size.

✅ Flex 50K → $71
✅ EOD 50K → $62
✅ GOAT Daily 50K → $107

Limited time only.
👉 Code: GFF55
https://t.co/abqiGp4Oa4