@griptmedia@GenderReceipts@Ben_Scallan By her own argument you could give kids hard core porn and it would be up to the parents to decide whether a child reads it. Not to mention that no child over the age is 10 is reading with a parent.
I am no longer surprised at the degree of intellectual vacuity contained in your posts, but this one is especially worthy of comment.
“We have a responsibility to our trans constituents to resist it.”
Actually, you have a responsibility to your female constituents to fully support it. Yjis is because it is a code of conduct specifically written to assist in the effective implementation of settled law.
“The Code will exclude trans people from services and facilities that they have long used without issue ”
The Code will do no such thing. This statement is either a deliberate lie or a further example of legislative incompetence. Both explanations are probably in play here.
Trans people are not ‘excluded’ from any services. They are specifically included in all services provided based on their birth sex. There isn’t a single-sex service that trans people are excluded from.
If a trans individual has previously used services designated for the opposite sex, they have done so in contravention of the law, in which single-sex services have always been segregated by reference to biological sex. It is the responsibility of the trans individuals concerned, and those who have been advising them erroneously; if they have been acting unlawfully.
It is false to claim that these historical abuses of single-sex spaces has passed ‘without issue’. There are countless examples of detriment to women and girls and a long history of trans infiltration being challenged.
There is no evidence that using correct-sex facilities will make trans individuals more likely to be the victims of violence.
Trans individuals will not be ‘pushed out of public life’ as they have the right to access public facilities appropriate to their sex.
“It ushers in an era of enforced segregation for trans people.”
This is another lie. Any ‘segregation’ that occurs is a) the result of the proper interpretation of the Equality Act and b) based on the material reality of sex. It only requires any ‘enforcement’ due to the insistence of, in particular, trans identifying men that they are entitled to ignore the law, transgress women’s boundaries and infiltrate female spaves for the purpose of validating their identities and exercising their fetishes.\
”The Code represents a profound rollback of rights,”
This is also a lie. No ‘rights’ have been ‘rolled back’. The Code implements the law as clarified in the For Women Scotland Case, which found that it has ALWAYS been the law that single-sex spaces are segregated by biological sex, meaning that it has never been a ‘right’ for a male person (whatever his ‘identity’) to invae and colonise female spaces.
I challenge every single person who believes minors should be enabled and even encouraged to transition to read this first person testimony to the end.
1/3
via @IWF https://t.co/3276o4tg8J
Iranian hairstylist Ami Moghadam received death threats for posting videos of women receiving haircuts on Instagram.
So she decided to troll the Islamic Regime and their oppressive mandatory hijab laws in the most epic, hilarious way possible. 😂
A reminder: like all Terfs who signed the letter defending @JK_Rowling, I am blackballed by @BBC. I used to always be interviewed/reviewed by @BBCRadio4 but not now, though this State of the Nation novel is getting rave reviews. So do please buy it, spread the word etc.
The Australian government says this bloke with a face that looks like a bag of moldy sprouts you found at the back of the fridge that you forgot about is a woman, and that's that.
Please don't share.
The person who attacked my daughter, spat on my wife, and broke the restaurant's front door was not arrested by @metpoliceuk. Why?
I was arrested again for defending my family 😂
This was the SUV they came in.
Please repost
@HazelTarragon@m_jivetoaster@STILLTish@Sorelle_Arduino@oliviabaileymp Here’s the man behind the grift. Mridul Wadhwa diverted £1.4 million of funding from 3 single-sex women's aid groups to a company called SACRO who just happened to be run by his partner. https://t.co/C3z08VI3S3
This film of Mridul Wadhwa admitting he obtained his job at a rape crisis centre by deception has just been removed by YouTube for "copyright infringement", so please don't watch or share it. (C) @WingsScotland