Parallel Author

A fiction author and former tech professional who also writes political and cultural commentary. This profile focuses on the latter.

[Parallel Author @ParallelAuthor]

@ChristianHeiens Of course it’s not the only recourse. We can and should pass a Constitutional Amendment to reverse the decision and revoke every one of the citizenships it improperly recognized.

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

American patriot @Asmongold read our entire Rape Gang Inquiry report to his millions of subscribers over seven hours.

He has already done more than the entire British media establishment.

An incredible effort.

https://t.co/RKkqx9yY4V

[Kevin Sorbo @ksorbs]

Not a single post about the grooming gangs from anybody who was yelling about the Epstein files being released.

That should tell you everything you need to know.

[Justine Bateman @JustineBateman]

This is not a political situation. This is a royal family of an area where a quarter of a million girls have been repeatedly and routinely sexually brutalized.
This isn’t political; this is unspeakably evil. @RoyalFamily

[Bad Hombre @Badhombre]

The only reason we know anything about Britain’s Muslim rape gangs, and why a report about them has racked up 33 million views on X as of this post, is because victims like Sammy Woodhouse and Sarah Wilson finally felt they could share their stories here without censorship.

Rupert Lowe felt he could publish the report here and it wouldn't be censored like it would've been under the previous owners.

After decades of being ignored, dismissed, and treated like criminals by mainstream media, police, and prosecutors, X gave them a platform to speak out.

For months, Elon Musk has been relentlessly amplifying and bringing renewed attention to their stories. He probably won’t take any credit, but he deserves it. Thanks to X, there may actually be some real accountability.

Gaslighters like Piers Morgan and Mehdi Hasan are powerless to stop it.

[jjinUK64 @JjinUk64]

The areas where these gangs operate(d) are places like Rotherham and Oldham.

They are basically South-Asian Muslim ghettos. Even many of the police in these places are part of the biraderi clans, they're also Pakistani (or Bangladeshi) Muslims.

And so are many of the councillors that control local government. That is important context here.

[Parallel Author @ParallelAuthor]

@Geoffiam @RupertLowe10 You misspelled "telling the truth."

[Parallel Author @ParallelAuthor]

Sadly, this does seem to be the direction they're headed. And it's difficult not to wonder if the motive of the UK establishment's journey toward increasing censorship isn't partly to protect itself from the consequences of this unspeakable betrayal of the British people.

[𝐍𝐢𝐨𝐡 𝐁𝐞𝐫𝐠 🇮🇷 ✡︎ @NiohBerg]

I'm calling it now:

Rupert Lowe's rape gang inquiry will be declared "illegal content" by the British state.

They will then use the incoming Digital ID to track and arrest everyone who shares it. Thousands will go to jail for spreading the truth.

[Parallel Author @ParallelAuthor]

@DanBilzerian Stop lying.

[MOMof DataRepublican @data_republican]

Before Obamacare, the biggest issue in health care was pre-existing conditions. They ruined all of healthcare to address this single issue. Corporations now own it all and can dictate protocols. I feel very fortunate to have a doctor who doesn't play the game, but it makes insurance payments dicey.

[Parallel Author @ParallelAuthor]

@Bren831 @japan_nobunaga It's been happening for decades. Get your head out of the sand.

[NOBUNAGA🇯🇵🏯_夏樹蒼依 @japan_nobunaga]

I had to read this three times before I could believe it was real.

Rotherham. A small town in northern England.

For sixteen years, at least 1,400 children — some as young as eleven — were raped, gang-raped, and trafficked between cities by organized groups of men.

Eleven years old.
Petrol was poured on them so they would stay quiet.
Their families were threatened with death.
Photos were taken and used as blackmail.

The police knew.
The council knew.
The social workers knew.

For sixteen years, not one of them moved.

Why?
Because officers were afraid of being called racist if they acted on what they were seeing.
That was the whole reason.
While children were being sold, adults were protecting their own reputations.

That is the moment something in you breaks.

And here is the part that makes it worse.

The TV networks did not report it. The papers did not chase it.
When the journalist Andrew Norfolk finally broke the story, even he thought maybe 150 girls had been hurt.
The real number was 1,400.
He was staggered.

This should have been the biggest story of the decade. It was not.
The networks looked away. The advertisers preferred safer topics.
The cover-up did not end when the report was published — it continued in the silence of every newsroom that refused to chase it.

Then Elon Musk bought X.

The advertisers fled.
The press declared the platform finished.
X almost did not survive.

But it did.

And on X, the names of those towns started trending.
Rotherham.
Telford.
Rochdale.
Oldham.

Towns the country had been told to forget.

Britain understands itself differently today.
Not because the politicians confessed.
Not because the broadcasters apologized.
Because one platform refused to let it stay buried.

X almost did not survive.
1,400 children almost stayed forgotten.

That is worth saying out loud.

[C3 @C_3C_3]

John Thune is lying.

He needs 50 votes plus VP Vance to pass the Save America Act.

All he needs to do is force a “Talking Filibuster”.

No Senate rule changes.
No nuking the Filibuster.

He isn’t powerless.
He doesn’t need to find votes.

He needs to not be a traitor.

Truth.

[Parallel Author @ParallelAuthor]

@NemoSobrious @OneTweetAwayMan @EricLDaugh It's too late, buddy.

[Parallel Author @ParallelAuthor]

@OneTweetAwayMan @EricLDaugh Well, they just torpedoed ANY chance of that ever happening now. I've been a supporter of the Kurds over the years, and even I don't want to have anything to do with them after they way they screwed us over on this.

[Benjamin Weingarten @bhweingarten]

The presumption baked into our political and legal system is that there will not be widespread election fraud, with the burden of proof on challengers who overwhelmingly will lack standing in a court of law, access to necessary records (to the extent they exist given breakdown in chain of custody when it comes to mail-in ballots), and the time necessary post-election to pursue and adjudicate claims.

When you move to remote voting over extended periods of time with policies the likes of ballot harvesting and counting of votes received a week after the election, the odds of fraud and difficulty of capturing, preventing, or reversing it only grow.

It is only logical that people witnessing massive swings that appear statistically anomalous between election night results and results week after under such schemes would suspect rigging and fraud.

And it is only logical that states prohibiting their voter rolls from being audited, or refusing to take steps to clean their rolls would come under further suspicion.

If you wanted to systematically eviscerate confidence in the integrity of our elections, you'd be hard-pressed to devise a regime better than California's to do it.

[Parallel Author @ParallelAuthor]

@lamps_apple @GovPressOffice We also need to demand statistics on how many ballots were received and processed that fit this description.

[Parallel Author @ParallelAuthor]

@lamps_apple @GovPressOffice They're still supposed to check for a receipt confirming that the ballot was delivered by an approved mail carrier (USPS or private). We need to demand proof that this is being done, and that some of the carriers are not colluding to omit postmarks to facilitate such fraud.

[Parallel Author @ParallelAuthor]

@nithyavraman You are an illegitimate candidate. Your position on the November ballot is being secured by open, naked, in-your-face cheating that even those most skeptical of election fraud can see plainly.

[James Lindsay, anti-Communist @ConceptualJames]

It's happening!