R Howard Parks

[Patricia McGrath- Miller🇺🇲🇮🇪 @irishqueen1031]

👇

[R Howard Parks @ParksHoward73]

@MbarkCherguia Lyndon Johnson

[The Texas Longhorn @DannyMintys]

Idiot Idiot dumber than rocks.

[Greg The Groyper @GroyperGreg]

Women when someone tells them that they can’t kill their own children

[Khazar Milker Connoisseur @Khzrmlkcnnsr]

You are here.

[Weronika Rogowska @Rogowskawero]

Rome. Barely off the plane and the taxi driver already tells the truth no one in power wants to say out loud.

A blonde young woman. Walking these streets? She is not safe. Illegal immigration has changed the city. Everyone knows it. Few will admit it.

Europe is watching Poland. Strong borders. No excuses. No open-door experiments. We don’t mess around.

We can do the same. Secure the frontier. Protect our cities. Protect our women.

Be like Poland.

[Bethany Cherisse @BethanyCherisse]

I'm not a mother, but I was discussing the Clancy case with mine. And this is what she said:

"If I did that to my children, I would beg for them to give me the death penalty. And even if I didn't do it, I would still beg for death. I wouldn't want to go on living."

That is all.

[Adam Lowisz X Meetup 🇺🇸🇵🇱🇪🇺🇬🇧🇺🇦 @AdamLowisz]

Who can forget CNN claiming that Elon was finished 🤣

[Sana Ebrahimi Ledene @SanaELedene]

I’m just repeating what a few other women already said out loud:

If Lindsay Clancy walks on this, every woman in a high-stakes job just got a new target on her back.

Female pilot? Cool. Now the first thing people will ask is whether she’s hormonal, postpartum, or one bad night from crashing a plane into a mountain.

Female president? You want the nuclear codes in the hands of someone who can snap and then call it “a psychosis”?

That’s the door this verdict opens. And it won’t close.
If she is not found guilty of murdering those three kids, women don’t get compassion.
We get suspicion. Forever.
Prosecute her as a murderer, or watch one “crazy bitch” torch the credibility of every woman who still has to prove she can be trusted with other people’s lives.

[R Howard Parks @ParksHoward73]

@TRobinsonNewEra Scooooorrrrre

[R Howard Parks @ParksHoward73]

@Tullage I call that a daily challenge

[Matt Van Swol @mattvanswol]

🚨WHAT ON EARTH?!!

A 99-year-old woman was BEATEN in her own home by an intruder and a 911 dispatcher LISTENED TO IT HAPPEN as a man kicked her on the floor...

...and nobody was sent to help her, for THREE HOURS!!!!

She had to ARMY-CRAWL to her own phone and call for help herself.

Her name is Shirley, she is 99 years old, she required over 100 stitches.

On the morning of July 27th in Milwaukee, a stranger named "Joseph Guadalupe Macias" broke into her home and started beating her.

Around 5:15 a.m., her Life Alert company called 911 for her.

Twice.

On the second call, the operator held the line open so the city dispatcher could LITERALLY HEAR SCREAMING inside the house.

In the operator's own words on the recording:

"It sounds like he is kicking an elderly woman while they're down on the floor."

And they didn't send ANYONE.

Because someone at that call center labeled it a "welfare check." A domestic. Not a woman being beaten to death on her own floor.

So it never got the emergency response.

So Shirley, 99 years old, beaten, on the ground, did the only thing left to do.

"She literally army crawled, having to try to save her own life."

She dragged her own broken body across the floor to reach a phone and then after nearly THREE HOURS after that first call, she called 911 herself.

Only then did help finally come.

Police arrested the man, Joseph Guadalupe Macias.

And Shirley?

Her family released the photos and I genuinely don't know how she survived.

Nearly two months later, she is STILL in a rehab center.

When officials finally held a press conference, the director admitted they "didn't meet" their mission.

Two questions in, he got up and WALKED OUT of the room.

Two call-takers have resigned.
The city still won't release the full investigation.
The family is having to FIGHT for answers.

Please pray for Shirley and her recover, I cannot IMAGINE how horrifying of an experience this was.

[R Howard Parks @ParksHoward73]

voir dire was performed on each juror
Jury of your peers means the lowest common denominator
2026 we live among brainwashed, uneducated or illeducated screen staring useful idiots that cannot use critical thinking

[Matt Johnston @MattInformed]

The jury that I recently served on was hung because:

1. Three jurors refused to discuss the evidence with an open mind. At the start of deliberations, they declared: “I will never change my mind on this. You could never convince me otherwise.” They demanded a hung jury verdict in the first hour of deliberations - simply because our initial vote was split. That was a violation of jury instructions.

2. Very few of the jurors were able to take the entire case in context, and parse through all the testimonies and evidence to decipher what we believed was the truth. They wanted to pick 1 testimony as the perfect telling and did not know how to decide given discrepancies between them all.

3. Two jurors kept objecting to points of discussion because of “bias” that they claimed we were invoking into our deliberations. These jurors claimed that some of the evidence submitted during trial could not be considered by the jury because it would “trigger our biases.” They kept interjecting “that’s bias” or “you’re just biased” or “that’s your bias tainting the evidence.” Other jurors responded to this defensively and would back down at the accusations.

4. One juror in particular - totally woke - viewed the entire world as groups (oppressors) and individuals (victims) and so would not accept anything as true, right, or good that could come from the group (they were the accusers), and defaulted to the individual (the accused) as the only possible honest person. She refused to accept any testimony or evidence offered by the group, and became visibly shaken and angry if any other juror questioned the integrity or testimony of the accused - a testimony that was filled with errors and contradictions.

She was also very condescending to all others.

5. Multiple jurors declared it was “impossible to decide the facts of the case” because there was no video evidence. They lamented that we don’t have “surveillance like in the UK” in all public places, and as such it would be impossible to determine the facts of this case. If t hey could not see the events, they would not believe them.

6. Several jurors could not understand the written law, even after being provided explanations and instructions from the court. They simply could not comprehend. Not that they disagreed, but they could not understand.

7. Two jurors kept interrupting the process of discussion saying “you’re wasting our time” and they kept telling us they wanted to vote and go home and put this mess behind us.

Alas…a hung jury was the right outcome. Not because of the case, but because of the deficiency of the jury.

[Brigitte Angelini @brigitte_angeli]

Espagne : Un agriculteur a trouvé un « changement climatique » dans l'un de ses champs de blé.

[Johnny Midnight ⚡️ @its_The_Dr]

Hmm 🤔

[Juanita Broaddrick @atensnut]

What an absolute asshole!!

[Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 @TRobinsonNewEra]

New figures reveal that crime in Ceuta has increased eightfold since July 30.

One effect of the disorder is that nursery schools have delayed reopening because safety cannot be guaranteed.

This is an international disgrace.

[The Elephant in the Room @elephant_23]

Maybe I’m the asshole here, but somebody explain this to me.

How the FCK is a jury deadlocked over a woman killing her three children?

At some point, we have to stop making the simplest facts complicated.

Three children went into that house alive.

Their mother strangled them.

Three separate children. Three separate acts.

And now twelve people are sitting on their asses in a room unable to agree on whether she should be held criminally responsible?

What exactly are we debating?

There has to be a line somewhere.

If deliberately killing your own three children doesn’t cross it, then I genuinely don’t know where the hell that line is anymore.

Friggin ridiculous.

[Matt Walsh @MattWalshBlog]

The defense attorney showed up to the court today with a bundle of fan mail for Lindsay Clancy. Fan mail for a woman who strangled all of her children to death. My faith in humanity has never been lower.

[NOBUNAGA🇯🇵🏯_夏樹蒼依 @japan_nobunaga]

Japan was once the land of the samurai. Now even the yakuza have been crushed and driven underground, leaving the country remarkably easy to open up to mass immigration.

What amazes me most is the persistence behind it.

It feels as though someone decided decades ago: “We will transform this country through immigration, even if it takes 30 years. Even if it takes 50. Even if Japan is unrecognizable by the end.”

That kind of determination is extraordinary.

So who has been pushing this for decades?

Who benefits from it?

And who is really pulling the strings?