Own everything: your tokens, apps, and infrastructure. Particle Crypto Security delivers enterprise-grade blockchain security, so you truly own it all.
ParticleCS builds the bridge between everyday business process and on-chain execution - so security teams can actually operate.
Bloxchain is our open protocol, with https://t.co/t02jLJN8Cm for operators in the browser. Sensitive actions go through rules you can audit, not ad-hoc signing.
Independent review of the core framework (NM_0828) ↓
We completed a security audit of @particle_cs's Bloxchain framework,an open-source security framework for Ethereum applications designed so sensitive operations use roles, waiting periods, and multi-party control - not a single key acting alone.
Our security team reviewed the protocol's smart contract architecture and implementation.
@Walodja1987 That is a great tip!
We took it a step forward by giving developers in solidity a full compostable library build around programmable governance control.
We call it the Bloxchain Protocol and it is open source exactly for this use case
https://t.co/OdIc5MSvtd
Jacob at @particle_cs summed up Bloxchain Protocol's security review in one line: "Each layer caught what the last one left, and we fixed as we went." Bloxchain is a reusable library for approvals, time-locks and role-based controls, built to be dropped into other teams' EVM stacks.
The layers: AuditAgent with fixes between runs. Then an AgentArena competition, where independent agents on the same codebase caught what the scans had left. By the time our auditors opened the repo, the routine defects were already fixed and their time went to design and algorithmic questions.
https://t.co/OlS8Wnhror
Trust is not just recognizing a sender. It is making authority, delay, and a second set of eyes part of the operation.
That is the direction Bloxchain takes with governed on-chain operations: roles, waiting periods, and execution rules.
→ https://t.co/c3oucadIXR
The hardest request to spot is not the fake-looking one. It is the one that arrives through a channel everyone already trusts, and still should not be acted on alone.
That is the process-trust question raised by reports involving #Revolut
The source here is a secondary Korra/Duel X report, not primary confirmation:
https://t.co/wv7s8ECHeI
Treat the incident details as reported claims, not certainty. The durable lesson is process verification
The same principle belongs in operations: high-impact actions should require roles, waiting periods, and rules for external calls.
Those controls make an unusual request slower to execute and easier to challenge, without pretending any system is perfect.
Before releasing sensitive data or moving value, verify out of band:
• Call a known number.
• Confirm the request with a second authorized person.
• Do not let the first channel be the only source of truth.
A real-looking thread is still one channel.
Reports claim an official government mailbox was allegedly compromised, then European Investigation Order–shaped requests reached a bank compliance desk.
If that pattern holds, the failure was trusting one official-looking channel as proof, not a spelling error.
@Deeen_Codes Thank you for sharing, what a great list!
We will be sponsoring future events as well, but for now if any are looking for an edge, we recently open sourced our solidity infrastructure for on chain programmable governance
Feel free to check it out 🌟
https://t.co/OdIc5MSvtd
The key point is not audit vs unaudited statistics
The key is that hacks occur at the seam were it is harder to defend.
Infrastructure, key management and governance
This is exactly what we solving. Infrastructure build from the ground up to provide on chain governance where on single key can unlock the infra
1/ Custody is back on the U.S. regulatory agenda.
The SEC’s 2026 rulemaking plan includes modernizing custody rules for crypto assets, even while broader market-structure legislation is still moving through Congress.
3/ That’s the line Bloxchain is built around.
Non-custodial by design: roles, waiting periods, and on-chain execution rules. ParticleCS does not hold customer keys.
Policy lives on-chain - not in a vendor back office.
2/ Rules will keep evolving. One operational question already decides whether a product is software or sitting on customer risk:
Who can unilaterally move the funds?