@TheOliverStone Alexander was slated by critics but it is my most watched movies and in my opinion a masterclass. Watched the directors cut yesterday and in the original I had missed the connection between the assassin and Philip. It is a fantastic movie, one of the best.
Just bought Excalibur (1981) for Β£3.99 on Amazon. Crazy seeing a young Liam Neeson, Patrick Stewart, Gabriel Byrne, Helen Mirren and Ciaran Hinds all on screen together. The late Nicol Williamson is brilliant. Back in the days when TV shows and acting were real.
Ever wonder what reality and the meaning of life is? I'm on a journey to deliver the answer through Project Resonance. The answer will take years but you are welcome to join me on the journey.
No matter how many times I rebuild my current Project Resonance data and refine it through AI, taking great care to keep the synthesis methods sterile, it keeps arriving at this one same conclusion:
Reality is a process in which information or potential states are continually being selected, transformed and expressed through boundaries into organised physical form.
AI is advising me there is now sufficient data to build a genuine provisional scientific model, but not yet enough to claim a unique physical theory of reality.
What I am currently missing are defined measurable variables; units; equations that generate numerical predictions; a specified substrate, and a mechanism explaining why the same transformation law should apply from cells to planets to identity. I have still only converted 1/10th of the material into searchable electronic data so perhaps those missing pieces are still waiting to be found.
Truth is if I even attempted to build such a model with AI, there is no way I could submit it for scientific peer review.
So here I am sat with what looks like the secrets of the universe which I can neither understand myself nor convince the scientists that can, it's worth looking at.
The part I have to avoid when approaching scientists is the part I believe most and it is as unprovable as it is obvious:
In 1994, 62 school children, including Emily Trim, were approached by two non-human intelligences at Ariel School, Ruwa, Zimbabwe . This wasn't an accident. They knew everything about those children, from past, present to future.
One of them was chosen to be a conduit for a message, a message that needed to be heard. In Biblical terms this was a repeating of Moses and the burning bush. It was through Emily Trim that that this message was conveyed, not through a little voice in the head or some psychic ability. It just manifested over years as thoughts, ideas, hard to separate from Emily's own thoughts, perceptions, life experiences. But it was there, it was real and she tried to understand it the best she could.
Sadly, she left us with her message complete, not just complete, but meticulously archived in an electronic format on Instagram so it would survive her.
There is nobody on this planet who will have looked at what she drew or analysed it to the extent that I have. When you're in my position, you see the reality - this was NHI communication, but for the world today, this reality can't be true. In the world today, there's no such thing as non-human intelligence, but in the world of tomorrow, there will be and when that day comes this data becomes more valuable than anything else out there.
It will also be the day, many people will owe Emily an apology and feel a great sense of shame.
@theesk Think its clear @friedkingroup just own us as second fiddle to Roma. Seeing their early statements in such contrast to their subsequent actions does change my mind on them.
Don't think people understand the significance of a 10% risk. It's like being told 1 out of every 10 people walking through this doorway will drop dead but its all of humanity walking through the doorway. Would you accept the risk and walk through? Not a chance, so ban AI.
@talkSPORT@friedkingroup Hey @talkSPORT@alanshearer You guys still going to bang the drums of woe and negativity? Very capable young squad as I said and it will be built up over the next couple of years with actual structure - not on the whims of us fans or you pundits but on strategic planning.
@talkSPORT Oh piss off, he won't because he's a professional and doesn't listen to dense pundits. Also the whole thing is a media illusion, this squad is lean but capable as a transition squad. @friedkingroup need to do some PR because you lot are filling the silence with negative crap.
If this time next season Everton have a squad like this I'd be worried but this is what I expected as a three year plan. Stabilise, trim the squad and then build - carefully. I back Dan @friedkingroup I just think they need to communicate the plan as some people don't see it.
@WarMonitor3 Nah think we just need to use the Russian playbook and remind them any attempt to take our sovereign territory will be considered existential and oh by the war we are a nuclear power.
Can't blame Friedkin if he is selling, he must open his socials and recoil at the amount of moany, needy paranoid rubbish some sections of the fanbase post. Constant cycles of blame, its the coach, no its the CEO, no its the owners. People need to get a grip.
@theesk Are there any fingerprints of a plan to sell in the clubs financial behaviour or is this just mischief from the press? Are they conflating investment with outright selling?
@GiuliaBould Missed it but think everyone's overreacting. The clubs in good shape, yes a bit thin on the ground to compete this year but compare that to years ago when we had a massive overpaid squad we couldn't shift. @friedkingroup are rebuilding so we need to let them get on with it.
@TeleFootball Its not negligence - selling players and buying them relies on opportunity. The selling and buying opportunities often don't align and this is way better than having loads of buying opportunities in the next window and not being able to take them due to shifting dead wood.
@ToffeeTVEFC You're a Β£40m asset, so don't care if you got butt hurt by a medical officer flagging a concern before spending an amount of money that could feed a nation.
@richardajkeys Its cheating, there's no way they can have revenue streams without the owners money coming through back doors. Give them a none wealthy owner and lets see what their revenue streams are then. The problem is to these clubs had time to spend money to build revenues then it locked