Regardless of all this craziness going on in the world I have to say I am truly happier now at this point in my life than I have ever been. I'm 61, been married to my best friend for 42 years. I have 2 great kids and 8 grandkids that are totally the apple of my eye!
I had to go on disability about 3 years ago. That single event is the reason for my happiness. You see, that job was killing me. Physically and emotionally. If your not happy in anything (job, relationship, etc..) get out. It's not worth it. You will thank me later. Here are the reasons for my happiness π I love them beyond everything π
@QueenOfRespawn Imagine how bad his life's going to be when him and @MrsErikaKirk goes to JAIL! She really needs to change that X ID. That's a bigger fraud than anything going on in her f*cked up world.
@QueenOfRespawn They're gonna fail so bad. Charlie was who they came to see. No one can hold his jock strap, although they think they can. ππ€¦ββοΈππ€£
@CopeIsClutch@daniel7te@hodgetwins No, she knew exactly what she was doing. If she was a Christian before she had to know the consequences. I do not feel sorry for her one bit!
@RealCandaceO Strange you mentioned MK Ultra. I think they (government) kidnapped Charlie and he is being MK Ultra'd right now. Explains how strange TPUSA has been acting π€
The highlighted passage is prosecutorial advocacy, not a defense admission. The Stateβs assertion that Robinson βdoes not challenge the substanceβ merely describes what his lawyers chose to contest in a preliminary-hearing memorandum. It does not establish that the defense accepts the rooftop identification, fatal-shot attribution, rifle linkage, DNA interpretation or alleged instructions to his roommate. This is in no wise a stipulation. Or an admission. How could it be? Itβs a prosecution submission.
Preliminary hearings test probable cause under relaxed evidentiary rules; they are not trials. Competent counsel may attack hearsay and aggravators without prematurely revealing experts, impeachment, alternative theories or forensic challenges. The prosecution still must prove at trial that Robinson fired the fatal shot, using admissible evidence subjected to cross-examination. A prosecutorβs confident summary cannot substitute for ballistics, causation and proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Everyone knows that probable cause will be found. But unless the matter is contested, all objections are waived, and the particular issue is not preserved for appeal.
Blake, stay in your own lane, kid. Listen to @RealCandaceO.
Utah prosecutors have responded to Tyler Robinson's defense filing ahead of the final preliminary hearing, and confirms what observers pointed out about that filing: The defense is very conspicuously not contesting any of the core evidence showing Tyler Robinson committed the murder. They don't contest the camera footage, the DNA, the rifle, the cause of death, or Tyler's phone data.
All they have is a complaint about reliable hearsay (which won't apply at the full trial anyway) and then attacks on the aggravating factors.
If there was any merit at all to any of the theories that Candace et al. have pushed the last 11 months, why didn't the defense bring them up?