I saw a post on Reddit that said, “When you walk through a museum, you’re not just looking at art. You’re moving through centuries of people trying to explain love, grief, power, beauty, and belonging.” I don’t think I’ve ever seen a museum described so beautifully.
The moment the law only favours those we deem fit we end up with a society where Waiswa Mufumbiro & others are behind bars for shady reasons. Never blur the lines, even those accused of murder have rights & they should be upheld in accordance to the constitution.
The best lawyers I know read constantly. Fiction, psychology, history, biography. The courtroom rewards the broadly educated. The law rewards the curious. Read everything.
How many times must a court strike down a law before Parliament learns how to write one?
I spent this weekend reading judgments. Not as a hobby. As a citizen who is running out of patience and deeply concerned by judgements striking out these laws and saying the same thing.
The Computer Misuse Amendment Act fell twice in the same judgement. First, because of its words, "malicious information," "ridicule or demean", were so vague that no ordinary Ugandan could know, in advance, what they were forbidden from doing. Second, because Parliament did not have enough members present to legally pass it. Their own Hansard proved it. A law the government celebrated as Uganda's firm answer to the dangers of the digital age, killed by a quorum Parliament could have counted on its fingers before the vote was called, A similar issue dealt with by courts in the Paul K. Ssemwogerere Cases.
Criminal defamation had lived on Uganda's statute books since before independence. A colonial provision, inherited without question, enforced without shame. The court struck it down because civil law had always existed to handle the exact same harm, without sending anyone to prison. The less restrictive option was always there. Nobody ever asked whether it was necessary. They simply kept locking people up.
Then the military courts. The Constitutional Court said it was unconstitutional in 2021. The Supreme Court, all seven judges, confirmed it in January 2025 and ordered every civilian trial before a court martial to stop immediately. By June, Parliament had passed new legislation restoring exactly what the court had just buried. The President said Uganda is not governed by judges. Parliament, through that legislation, quietly agreed.
These are not difficult legal questions. These are not close calls or matters of genuine constitutional ambiguity. These are the same failures, in the same places, produced by the same process, year after year, while the institutions that could prevent them sit fully staffed down the corridor.
The Constitution was not read at the swearing-in and then filed away. It is a living demand. It shows up at every Bill, every reading, every vote.
Parliament knows this. And that is precisely what makes the pattern so difficult to forgive.
There is still Hope.
Dean.