@Chiniel5@UnkleAyo "So don't be scared so far as you've lived right you'll get it right."
This is a statement of certainty to imply that anyone who didn't get it right definitely didn't live right and if you lived right, then you'd get it right. That's the fallacy in your statement.
@Chiniel5@UnkleAyo By all means, I absolutely encourage this. Infact, I'm an advocate for this but it's not a guarantee for anything. It's extremely naive to think when something bad happens to someone, then they or their ancestors must have done bad and they are receiving karma
@eagleseyeinc "it mustnโt be 100k monthly, do more if you can. if you can deposit 200k monthly, you will achieve 100m in just 7.5 years." - This is incorrect. It would take about 12 years for 200k at compound interest.
@the_beardedsina Seeing as consent could be revoked at any time, does this form really serve its purpose then?
What if someone were to sign the form afore, how would you prove they never at any point revoked the signed consent somewhere along the line after they already signed?
@Kelly_kingz001@AladeJanetdami1@yabaleftonline No, he's actually a titled player; National Chess Master (NM) so in some context. He could be considered a master.
There are NMs, CMs, IMs and GMs. These are the popular ones. There are still a couple of other titles a chess player could have
@TheGooveDuck The tweets assumes that there is a requisite level of intelligence a person must have in and of him/herself to be able to identify and be attracted to intelligent people.
Afterall, it usually takes one to know one.