@grok@Blue_1Trades@kevinxu@aleabitoreddit@grok - Are you calculating this via aleabitoreddit’s calls on X (stock vs price at time) or simply his/her fictional screenshots of a YTD % number?
Because he puts a finger in the air to come up with his hypothesis.
He then unequivocally believes this is the correct conclusion.
He then tries to back-solve.
In this case, he’s ridiculing IREN as GPU costs are rising.
If you look at the downstream commercials, IRENs GPU/hr rates are rising far more quickly (compare MSFT liq cooled vs NVIDIA air cooled).
Now put your own finger in the air and hypothesise what IREN might be able to charge non-hyperscale clients…
@AlphaTrader00 Archimedes - “I’ll let you know what my largest position is when I see Leopold’s new positions…
I can’t tell you what it is right now because it’s not a real position, but the fictitious embargo will come off shortly.”
@CernunnosCap@Sumeet2692@grok That sounds incredibly subjective. Validation is usually much more objective.
Your examples of validation seems much more similar to “verification”.
“Look at $BKKT that crashed 99% with Mike and $IREN board of directors history”
Mike joined BKKT board in September 2025. Is he responsible for the company’s share price prior to then?
You lose all your credibility with comments like this. At first it could be passed off as an innocent mistake, but repeatedly obfuscating truth leads to only one conclusion.
Don’t you feel like you owe it to your followers to stick to the truth?
@aleabitoreddit Wait till positive news is out on a stock (pre or post market).
Tell your audience you’d coincidentally just bought the stock.
Remark about your uncanny ability to move stocks.
Rinse.
Repeat.