Perth Today 🇦🇺 ™

Celebrating life, honouring people, loving Australia 🇦🇺 Discover hope ✝️ If you would like prayer, please 📞#PrayForMe 1800 772 936 #LoveNeverFails ❤️

[Craig Kelly:🇦🇺Foundation for Economic Education @craigkellyAFEE]

It’s not just that we have a sociopathic liar as Prime Minister - it’s that he wants the power to censor the opinions of others, claiming they are spreading "misinformation" - while also wanting taxpayers to fund "sock puppet" accounts to spread Albanese’s version of the truth.

His latest lies about his dirt sheet on Helen Haines, clearly demonstrate, that not a single word that comes out of his mouth can be trusted.

[Dr Joanna Howe @ProfJoannaHowe]

"Kindness" is now integral to woke ideology and the agenda of the left.

[Kat A 🌸 @SaiKate108]

The story is everywhere yet the Prime Minister’s own department claims to know nothing about the Helen Haines dirt file!

Despite the fact the meta data shows it was saved on their Sharepoint system.

Unbelievable.

[Dr Dave Cartland BMedSc MBChB Ex-MRCGP @CartlandDavid]

The Unvaccinated Are the Healthiest People According to a Cohort Study Looking at “Unvaccinated” Americans

"There are approximately 100,000 adults in America who've never received a vaccine in their life...the data is clear, showing the unvaccinated are the healthiest people on the planet...they are as healthy as children were in the '50s before all the shots."

Attorney Greg Glaser describes for Dr. Lee Merrit @LeeMerritt.

Join ➣ 👉@COVID19VACCINEVICTIMSANDFAMILIES

[Latika M Bourke @latikambourke]

Pauline Hanson can say sorry. The PM can't. Why @alboMPs' response should worry Labor MPs.

My analysis in @thenightlyau:

https://t.co/T5UYPYy0ZF

[Sandy Yang @SandyXiaotong]

ALBOS DIRT FILE: Watch Bridget McKenzie grill Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet officers about the dirt file written by staffer Joshua Lloyd targeting independent MP Helen Haines. You can see the fear. Watch

[The Daily Telegraph @dailytelegraph]

Albanese once demanded a minister resign over a community grant to her gun club. Now an inquiry has revealed his local golf club received $6m for a bar upgrade, writes Vikki Campion. ▶️ https://t.co/zogjYix1Fu

We launched a faster, redesigned app - with all new puzzles: https://t.co/AmOvUploiP

[Dr My Le Trinh (suspended)🐭8:32 @myletrinh123]

Shame on you, HCCC!
Shame on you!

You will be judged by Almighty God, not for what you have done to me, but for what you have done to the Australian people.

I won a long time ago. You are just not smart enough to know it.🌸🌿

[U.S. Embassy Australia @USEmbAustralia]

🇦🇺 🇺🇸 Australia is the 10th-largest source of #foreigndirectinvestment in the US! FDI from Australia was US$115.6 billion in 2025.
The @SelectUSA program has facilitated more than US$280 billion in investment commitments since the start of the Trump Administration.
Thinking about taking your business to the U.S.? Applications are open for the 2027 SelectUSA Investment Summit! Connect with U.S. states, economic development partners, and industry leaders for opportunities to invest and expand in America.
🔗 Start planning your U.S. expansion and explore the 2027 SelectUSA Investment Summit: https://t.co/qPZsMC7Per

[RadioGenoa @RadioGenoa]

Paris 1980, without Islam, hijab, and Macron.

[Senator Sean Bell @SenatorSeanBell]

Is this the strength in diversity we keep hearing about?

France is facing the consequences of serious failures in immigration and integration policy.

With another weekend approaching, are we about to see more of the same?

Australia needs to confront the hard questions about mass immigration, assimilation and public safety now.

[Stephanie Bastiaan @stephbastiaan]

There’s been a growing acceptance among elements of the left of violence as an act of political resistance against views they disagree with. Our political leaders have said nothing.

Silence when women were threatened and abused by trans activists. Silence when public figures like @PaulineHansonOz and @salltweets received public death threats. Silence when omnicause activists burned flags and chanted “globalise the intifada” in our cities.

Some even defended violence following the murder of Charlie Kirk.

Now, instead of collectively acknowledging this problem and confronting it, they’re weaponising the horrific attack on Helen Haines to push their digital duty of care bill.

As I said to Peta Credlin on @News24Aust last night, we need leadership, not censorship.

#Auspol

[Professor Ian Brighthope @VirusFighterVi1]

https://t.co/C624wwfUMC
They lied; they will pay for it; we will never quit.

[Paul Oosterhuis 🐭 @dragonfishy]

This is about the right to say No,

The Australian Immunisation Handbook requires that vaccination consent be voluntary and free from undue pressure, coercion or manipulation.

I believe No Jab, No Play ...
( take the full schedule or no childcare, or preschool for you ) is undue pressure, and coercion

and the No Jab, No Pay is a manipulation.

Thank you @JohnRuddick2 for bringing this Bill.

Conscientious Objection: Driven by conscience.

#BringBackConscientiousObjection

@RosieM1276203 @AaronSiriSG @stkirsch @chrismartenson @Jikkyleaks @MaryanneDemasi @TopherField @JohnLarter000 @cafelockedout @delbigtree

[Professor Ian Brighthope @VirusFighterVi1]

They lied. They will pay for it. https://t.co/TTYCj5InEN
You Demanded Our Trust. Now Answer for What You Told Us.

By Professor Ian Brighthope

I condemn every government, health authority, regulator, international agency and public official that knowingly misled people about COVID-19. No country, institution or office should be exempt from scrutiny.

I condemn the arrogance that confused public office with ownership of the truth. I condemn the cowardice that placed institutional reputation above honest disclosure. And I condemn every deliberate lie used to frighten people into compliance or shield those in power from accountability.

But the indictment must be accurate. An honest mistake, an uncertain finding and a deliberate deception are different things. Establishing who knew what, and when, is essential. Where officials knowingly deceived the public, “we were doing our best” is a bloody disgrace of an excuse.

Throughout my career in nutritional and environmental medicine, I have regarded questioning as a professional responsibility. Patients deserve explanations, evidence and respect. They deserve to hear what is known, what remains uncertain, and what could go wrong.

Those obligations become greater during an emergency.

The false certainty about ‘vaccination’ and transmission

Any categorical assurance that vaccination meant a person could neither acquire nor transmit COVID-19 was indefensible. Vaccines initially reduced infection risk, but that protection was incomplete and changed with time and variants. The CDC’s own published account acknowledged that vaccinated people could become infected and transmit the virus. Protection against severe disease was a separate benefit; it never justified promising an impenetrable barrier against infection.

That distinction mattered enormously when governments and employers demanded vaccination as a condition of participation in everyday life.

If you justified a restriction by claiming it would prevent transmission, you owed the public a continuing assessment of whether that justification remained sound. You owed them the evidence, the limitations and the criteria for ending the restriction.

A slogan cannot carry that burden. Neither can a press conference.

The dishonesty of treating safety as an absolute

“Safe” must never be allowed to mean “incapable of causing serious harm.”

Australia’s own surveillance identified myocarditis, pericarditis and thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome as genuine vaccine safety signals. Its report on 2021 recorded thirteen deaths assessed as likely causally linked to vaccination. These were uncommon outcomes, but they were real. Reports of deaths after vaccination were not all deaths caused by vaccination; equally, confirmed vaccine deaths could not honestly be dismissed as imaginary.

Every person asked to accept a medical intervention deserved an understandable account of its benefits and risks, including how those varied with age, sex, product and circumstances.

Anyone who knowingly concealed a material risk to improve uptake betrayed informed consent.

And anyone who treated an injured person as an inconvenience to a campaign betrayed the human purpose of medicine.

The failure to speak honestly about transmission

The WHO’s early guidance emphasised droplets and contact. Its July 2020 update acknowledged the possibility of aerosol transmission in crowded, inadequately ventilated indoor settings while describing continuing uncertainty. That history deserves examination: how quickly did authorities recognise the evidence, communicate it, and change practical protections?

Changing advice can be responsible. Pretending that earlier advice was beyond challenge cannot.

If an institution gets something wrong, it should say so plainly. People should not have to excavate yesterday’s guidance to establish that today’s certainty replaced yesterday’s certainty.

The abuse of “following the science”

Science does not make political decisions. People do.

Decisions about school closures, business restrictions, isolation, border controls and employment conditions involved judgments about competing harms, rights and resources. Officials must answer for those judgments themselves.

The United Kingdom’s own government response to its COVID inquiry acknowledges failures to take the effects on children and vulnerable people seriously enough, communicate clearly, and translate scientific advice into transparent, coherent policy. Those are substantial failures of government.

Every country should face the same questions. What alternatives were considered? What harms were anticipated? What evidence justified continuing a measure? Who challenged the prevailing view? Were they heard?

“Following the science” must never become a convenient way of saying: we exercised the power, but somebody else carries the blame.

The contempt for public questioning

People were entitled to ask about vaccine injury, changing recommendations, mandates, treatments, conflicts of interest and the origins of the virus.

A question does not become misinformation because it embarrasses a minister. A doctor does not become dishonest merely by challenging a policy. Equally, a claim does not become true simply because it challenges authority.

The standard must be evidence, applied consistently.

Where officials pressured institutions to suppress legitimate discussion, those actions deserve independent investigation. Where professional sanctions punished responsible, evidence-based disagreement, those cases deserve review.

Public confidence cannot survive a system that demands scrutiny of its critics while resisting scrutiny of itself.

Australia’s COVID inquiry warned that unsuccessful communication can produce an irreversible loss of trust. Authorities should reflect on their own contribution to that damage before blaming the public for becoming suspicious.

Open the records

I want the relevant contracts, advisory records, conflicts of interest, safety assessments and communications preserved and examined, with lawful protection for personal information.

I want independent inquiries able to establish what was known, what was withheld, what was exaggerated and what was knowingly false.

I want fair treatment and practical support for people injured by medical interventions.

Where evidence establishes professional misconduct, there should be professional consequences. Where it establishes corruption, fraud or another criminal offence, there should be prosecution through due process.

An inquiry that produces recommendations while leaving proven misconduct unanswered is inadequate.

You do not get to demand trust and then refuse accountability.

To every authority that knowingly lied: you abused a position entrusted to you for the protection of others. To every official who concealed uncertainty because honesty might complicate compliance: you treated citizens as instruments of policy. To every institution that protected its reputation at the expense of injured people: you failed the people you existed to serve.

Spare us the polished language about “communication challenges” where the evidence establishes deception. Spare us the self-congratulation where the records establish avoidable harm.

The public deserves the truth, including uncomfortable truths about failures, benefits, injuries and uncertainty.

No title is a shield. No emergency erases responsibility.

Open the records. Answer the questions. And where wrongdoing is proved, face the consequences.

We have an election in Victoria on the 28th. November, 2026.

We must have a party that will start a Royal Commission into every aspect of Covid that I have written about including the peripheral issues mentioned in my Substacks.

The only Party that looks like it may give us a RC is One Nation.

Ian Brighthope

[Andrew Bridgen @ABridgen]

At the Gates/ Bourla hearing in the Netherlands the Learned Council representing the Covid vaccine victims is correct.
The Covid shots are bioweapons.

[Nicolas Hulscher, MPH @NicHulscher]

It's INSANE that this is being normalized…

Data centers are now running on MILLIONS of LIVING HUMAN BRAIN CELLS that must be continuously fed nutrients and oxygen to stay alive.

These monstrosities are literally LIVING HUMAN–MACHINE HYBRIDS.

Welcome to dystopia.

[One News Australia @OneNewsAu]

🟠 ONE NATION MP LUKE HERDEGEN TELLS WA PARLIAMENT IN HIS MAIDEN SPEECH NO SEAT IS SAFE AFTER SHATTERING LABOR'S 37 YEAR HOLD ON SECRET HARBOUR 🟠

One Nation's Luke Herdegen has delivered a scathing maiden address in Western Australian Parliament, warning Premier Roger Cook that no seat on either side will be safe.

Fresh off a massive 30.7 point swing that ended Labor's unbroken dominance in Secret Harbour, Herdegen didn't hold back against career politicians.

He joked that the public gallery was so packed the Premier should foot the drinks tab, before telling both major parties: "You got complacent".

"People that don't like us call One Nation's rise populism. We call it democracy," Herdegen told the chamber. "We're not offering people free candy and no homework. We're not bribing people with their own money."

Confronting 17 government ministers directly, he called out soaring mortgage costs, mass immigration, and long delayed infrastructure promises like the Secret Harbour boat harbour Labor promised in 1983 and never built.

He warned Cook's frontbench that an orange wave of working families is coming to sweep safe seats across the country.

Read the full story here: https://t.co/Zcs4sDg6OC

🔴 Get our news straight to your inbox before Labor's Digital Duty of Care bill buries them, subscribe to our FREE daily newsletter here: https://t.co/hKPEgvdZ8H

Follow us on Facebook here: https://t.co/Nw4nZx1FuY

And subscribe for FREE on our YouTube channel https://t.co/O5TSWzqnrf so you can watch the stories the feeds won't show you.

[Liz Churchill @liz_churchill10]

HEROES in the Netherlands 🏆

Lawyer Peter Strassen receives a monumental welcome as he takes on Pandemic Planners Bill Gates, Albert Bourla and Mark Rutte in the Netherlands Civil Court Case…

[Liz Churchill @liz_churchill10]

Regime Media is still pretending that this doesn’t exist…

Dutch Lawyer Peter Stassen just dragged Bill Gates, Albert Bourla and Mark Rutte into a Netherlands Civil Court to answer for the COVID narrative that pushed the public into experimental injections.

PLEASE SHARE EVERYWHERE