Peter Moore

[Peter Moore @PeterXMoore]

@OracBell_ @VigilanteWayz_ @billifer1973 The constitution doesn't even mention God. "under God" is from the pledge of allegiance (which has no legal impact) and was added in 1956, not 1776

[Peter Moore @PeterXMoore]

@DefiantLs Call me crazy, but perhaps it has something to do with Louisiana having one of the largest forces of ICE deployed to it?

[Peter Moore @PeterXMoore]

@poopenheimer233 @nafo_boi @TMaixner37130 @DimitriNabokoff So please share some of your `objective' proof that NATO forces are fighting in Ukraine...

[Peter Moore @PeterXMoore]

@greatray1312 You seem to assume the non-beliver has the burden of proof. Why?

Would you similarly think it fair for someone to request from you the case for not believing in Thor, Santa Claus, or Bugs Bunny?

I don't believe because I haven't seen a sufficient argument for Gods existence.

[Peter Moore @PeterXMoore]

@Schloss6David @RobertGKepes @luisbaram Theists will argue that atheist denial of the existence of God is inconsistent if we can't explain what caused the Universe. But that raised the question of what caused God.

So can I assume that you agree we can claim unconditional ground for the Universe like you do for God?

[Peter Moore @PeterXMoore]

@Schloss6David @luisbaram Then please explain why I can't similarly construe the Universe as the universe as the ground existence itself? And claim it has no prior causes?

[Peter Moore @PeterXMoore]

@Thechosenone904 @SarahIronside6 @jaredMclarinet You maybe be thinking of the declaration of independence, which mentions God once and 3 indirect references.

But the constitution doesn't have ANY reference, and that isn't an accident

[Peter Moore @PeterXMoore]

@HallOfTim @Crazymoments01 It shows up in the woman's hand around 7 seconds

[Peter Moore @PeterXMoore]

@SpiderJack99 @MCMikeSkywalker @AtheistPhoenix That study shows only 1/3 of scientists believe in God. Only by including belief in a "higher beings or universal spirits" do you get to 51%

[Peter Moore @PeterXMoore]

@fredrick_d31586 @DrNeilStone So you have an actual link of him saying "all vaccines are completely safe"? Or is that just a quick hit you got from some meme?

[Peter Moore @PeterXMoore]

@ANicole12440 @HalfwayPost The Astronauts weren't abandoned. When Trump took office they were scheduled to be flown down late March. All Trump and Elon did was speed up that launch by a whole 2 weeks

[Peter Moore @PeterXMoore]

@CookieL33761265 @AnnCoulter The constitution delegates the choice of electors to the legislature. (Article 2, section 1, clause 2). So this is both legal and constitutional.

[Peter Moore @PeterXMoore]

@ARKloster @ChrisMoore15915 @AnnCoulter There is nothing in the Constitution that requires EVs to be chosen based on popular vote. The constitution grants the power of selecting the electors to the legislature.
So the Texas legislature could in theory choose to grant the state's EVs to anyone they like.

[Peter Moore @PeterXMoore]

@myAgentMP @subparanalysis @0xRuzy Are you sure?
In the fine print for the card, it states "Have a “Qualifying Balance” with U.S. Bank in open consumer Bank Smartly® Checking, and/or Safe Debit account(s). Deposits in other U.S. Bank accounts do not qualify

[Peter Moore @PeterXMoore]

@coffeelover479 @CoachRileyig @0xRuzy Instead of selling stock and paying capital gains tax, they borrow against their holdings and keep refinancing the loans. When they die, heirs get a stepped-up basis, allowing stock to be sold to repay the debt with little or no capital gains tax.

[Peter Moore @PeterXMoore]

@subparanalysis @0xRuzy I've never seen a 3% unlimited all category card. Perhaps you meant 2%?

[Peter Moore @PeterXMoore]

@thedarkhorsepod Please share how you can "logically deduce" that something went wrong without actual evidence? Unless "logically deduce" means "it is just obvious to me"?

[Peter Moore @PeterXMoore]

@ChristophE55272 @WhitakerTA_ Trump's own words and actions are what paint him as a man of low morals and class

[Peter Moore @PeterXMoore]

@Shrike_DeCil @AwakenedOutlaw You do realize that any citizen of California could challenge the results? So why do you think the California GOP wouldn't have that result before a judge in a heartbeat?