Peter Z.

If someone did preventative & curative health in this country &
called it health benefits, few would notice.
Neither the AMA, pharma or insurance. Telling.

[Peter Z. @PeterZapf]

@AHRQNews COVID is a virus.
Times of widespread health suggest traditional antiviral actions exist.
Who knows them nowadays?
Who doesn't?
Who's sharing them?
Who isn't?
What happens when we all know them again?

[Peter Z. @PeterZapf]

@OlympiaJoe Seems to me that's the wrong issue.
COVID is a virus.
The traditional antiviral actions are?
Is pharma sharing?
Who knows them nowadays?
What happens when we know them again?

[Peter Z. @PeterZapf]

@conwaynzca @bylenasun @CDCgov @JoelAchenbach Seems different people use these words differently.
That's really not the main point though.

[Peter Z. @PeterZapf]

@ddiamond @BrianneKNadeau She'll look bad when we relearn the traditional antimicrobial (including antiviral) actions.
They explain time of widespread health to me.

[Peter Z. @PeterZapf]

@sarahnferris @owermohle @AliceOllstein @adamcancryn Regardless of variant, it's a virus.
The traditional antimicrobial actions are?
We don't need to raise taxes.
We need to deal in facts.
Facts are good for our friends and family.
Profit motivated fictions aren't.

[Peter Z. @PeterZapf]

@AHRQNews @JAMAHealthForum Reducing waste is a secondary issue.
Returning to health is the main issue.
Why do times/areas of health exist?
Why don't they exist now?
Why do we have record sickness nowadays?
What are the traditional antimicrobial actions?
Which actions feed microbes?
How does this end?

[Peter Z. @PeterZapf]

@chrissyfarr Is Bezos' D2C health care offering more interesting?
Majority vote & the profit motive have trouble with facts.
Sugar shouldn't vote fat & salt are bad.
Milk shouldn't vote for pasteurization.
Fluoride is bad for bones/brain.
Rockefeller wanted to sell more oil so we have pharma.

[Peter Z. @PeterZapf]

@juliezweil @catherine_lucey Times of widespread health suggest traditional antimicrobial actions exist, to me.
Seems better to share those than sickness measures.
What happens when we know them again and return to widespread health?
(Democracy dies in darkness and majority vote doesn't work for facts.)

[Peter Z. @PeterZapf]

@LindseyTanner Times of widespread health exist without pharma.
Because traditional antimicrobial actions exist.
Pharma doesn't profit from sharing such facts.
What happens when we know them again?
Ask your pharma trained doctor or pharma influenced journalist?

[Peter Z. @PeterZapf]

@barbfederostrov @jjshong5 @CalMatters Public health officials are overseeing record sickness.
Pharma profits from sickness.
Times of widespread health exist because traditional antimicrobial actions exist.
What happens when we know them again?
If a company disguised them internally first, who'd notice?
That ends how?

[Peter Z. @PeterZapf]

@Surgeon_General Times of widespread health suggest traditional antiviral actions exist.
That's what I've reflected upon.

[Peter Z. @PeterZapf]

@jrovner @victoriaregisk More sickness with the FDA than before it.
Same for the DoH, NIH, CDC, AMA, pharma, med schools & charities: each in pharma's pocket.
Many people no longer do any traditional antimicrobial actions by accident.
If a company disguised them internally first, who'd notice?

[Peter Z. @PeterZapf]

@bylenasun @asteckelberg @Carolynyjohnson I'm at: know and do the traditional antimicrobial actions.
That covers all viruses.
Many do some actions by accident.
I've incorporated more into my daily life.
What happens when we all do some on purpose (and know them again)?

[Peter Z. @PeterZapf]

@Carolynyjohnson @David_RMartinez @KingLabIPD @WeissmanLab @KayvonModjarrad It is a virus.
There is an answer which doesn't come from pharma.
Times of widespread health suggest traditional antimicrobial actions exist.
If a company disguised them internally first, who'd notice?
Ask your (pharma trained) doctor? Or journalist?

[Peter Z. @PeterZapf]

@aneripattani @flakebarmer @KHNews @NPR Seems to me we have a problem when profit motivated fictions describe facts as misinformation.
Facts don't defend themselves well.
Times of widespread health exist because traditional antimicrobial actions exist.
Ask your (pharma trained) doctor? Or journalist?

[Peter Z. @PeterZapf]

@LennyMBernstein Times of widespread health suggest traditional antimicrobial actions exist.
So much pharma influence nowadays, so few facts;
and record sickness and injuries from shots.
If a company disguised the actions internally first, who'd notice?
What happens when we all know them again?

[Peter Z. @PeterZapf]

@CarlaKJohnson @umichmedicine Helpful.
But a return to zero is even better.
That'll happen when we relearn the traditional antimicrobial actions and do them on purpose.
Pharma's not sharing them.
What happens when we know them again?
Ask your doctor.

[Peter Z. @PeterZapf]

@PeterHotez Good for pharma.
Shots have unnecessary upside with known downside.
For those who know/do the traditional antiviral actions.
They explain times/areas of health.
Who's doing some on purpose nowadays?
If a company disguised them internally first, who'd notice?

[Peter Z. @PeterZapf]

@RosenthalHealth @flakebarmer @KHNews @NPR "Misinformation" is coming from many directions.
Profit motivated fictions describe facts as "misinformation".
Times/areas of widespread health exist because traditional antimicrobial actions exist.
Who does some on purpose nowadays?
What happens when we know them again?