Peter Lusk

Harvard Law School JD, Former Collegiate Football Coach, Former Air Force Captain, Air Force Academy Graduate and Football Player

[CBS News @CBSNews]

A federal judge in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday struck down President Trump's executive order targeting D.C.-based law firm WilmerHale, declaring the order "unconstitutional" and permanently blocking the administration from enforcing it. https://t.co/k2V4hbZjKr

[Jemal Singleton @CoachSings]

This is Awesome!!!! Former boss of mine rocking the AFA colors. Go Falcons!! Go Birds!!!

[William Baude @WilliamBaude]

Full order, six pages, is here: https://t.co/yovNribih9

[Ed Whelan @EdWhelanEPPC]

Paul Clement’s Courage and Integrity https://t.co/tdOlCiTbdi

[Air Force Football @AF_Football]

Ken Lamendola recognized as one of 35 under 35 by AFCA

https://t.co/b4S779Qeun

[Peter Lusk @Peter__Lusk]

@PODS Not only did your company screw up and cancel my order for no reason—I have been on the phone for 5 hours with your company and not only are you unable to fix the error and have a pod delivered, but you cannot even get in touch with the local delivery facility to try to fix it

[Peter Lusk @Peter__Lusk]

@PODS I have been getting messages and emails confirming my container delivery for weeks, then the night before, I called because I had not heard the delivery window—turns out PODS mistakenly canceled my order and cannot fix it. Lost money from moving permits, movers, travel plans

[Air Force Football @AF_Football]

Highlighting another member of the #BoltBrotherhood ⚡️

[Peter Lusk @Peter__Lusk]

[2/2] Trump v. US addressed the former but did not alter the status quo for the latter. The President still must have legal authority to take action--subject to judicial review. The difference is between being able to do something and being criminally liable for doing it.

[Peter Lusk @Peter__Lusk]

[1/2] In re Trump v. US, it is important to maintain the distinction between a President:
(1) not being criminally liable for official acts (now at least presumptively); and
(2) not being bound by the law at all in such actions.

[Conor Casey @Caseyco231]

Over at @thenewdigest Adrian Vermeule has offered thoughts on the recent Trump v United States case on official immunity. He explores what it means for someone to be “above the law” in classical thought ⬇️

[Sarah Isgur @whignewtons]

The Supreme Court was not meant to—and indeed is not capable of—saving us from our choice of leaders.

[Conor Casey @Caseyco231]

He’s not on X at the moment, but if you want Prof Adrian Vermeule’s take on the US Supreme Courts overruling of Chevron we have it over @thenewdigest ⬇️

[Peter Lusk @Peter__Lusk]

@zach_pohlman (4/4) Regarding stare decisis: I haven't looked at those portions of the two cases close enough to opine on their differences.

[Peter Lusk @Peter__Lusk]

@zach_pohlman (3/4) Much of the reasoning in Loper Bright seems to match the dissent's reasoning in Kisor (regarding Art. III, APA 706). Without Chevron, we are left with the MQD and Skidmore--all in all: many of the same factors as Kisor.

[Furman Football @PaladinFootball]

Furman's Roberto Named To Walter Payton Award Watch List https://t.co/xHW34kxYtL

[Jeff Darlington @JeffDarlington]

The Greatest of All Time.